/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12088303
>problem involves hypothetical scenario
>"lemme tell you why that couldn't actually happen"

Do you want to tell everyone that the Planck length disproves the existence of the real numbers next?

>>12071611
*[math]cos(t)[/math], not [math]cost(t)[/math]

Oops

>>11632580

Dude do you ever read the entirety of the post you're replying to before you start typing your rant? I acknowledged that D is incorrect, but it was INTENDED to be the correct answer. The OP of the thread miscalculated the probability and the anons in that thread explained why D should be 1.87% instead. Your interpretation literally cannot give an exact answer and I can't believe you're still pathetically trying to insist it's the right one.