Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.12088415 [View]
File: 27 KB, 640x359, 626.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12088415

>>12088303
>problem involves hypothetical scenario
>"lemme tell you why that couldn't actually happen"

Do you want to tell everyone that the Planck length disproves the existence of the real numbers next?

>> No.12071626 [View]
File: 27 KB, 640x359, 626.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12071626

>>12071611
*[math]cos(t)[/math], not [math]cost(t)[/math]

Oops

>> No.11632638 [View]
File: 27 KB, 640x359, 626.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
11632638

>>11632580

Dude do you ever read the entirety of the post you're replying to before you start typing your rant? I acknowledged that D is incorrect, but it was INTENDED to be the correct answer. The OP of the thread miscalculated the probability and the anons in that thread explained why D should be 1.87% instead. Your interpretation literally cannot give an exact answer and I can't believe you're still pathetically trying to insist it's the right one.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]