/lit/ - Literature

>>17637894
You are an intolerant bigot and you have no argument you vulgarian brainlet.

>>17637761
If that was true then you wouldnt have to ask.

>>17636456
If you were more cunning and charming you would suggest in a way which would result in you receiving gift cards to bookstores instead.

>>17637634
Whether it is or not is debatable, but your opinion just as well could be impertinent, fallacious, perversive trash. You profess to not serve Satan, but you are not being very charitable in your intolerance.

>>17637225
Phoneposting, and its easier and faster to shitpost.

>>17637114
Read his writings if you didnt know he worte anything. Tao of Jeet Kune Do, and theres some 3rd party that published books of his writings also.

>>17637519
>stop posting things I disagree with
Why even make such a post, why does it bother you so much?

>>17637474
The conception of God became more enlightened as their understanding evolved and progressed over time.

>>17623436
>In the Orient the combined teachings of Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism were synthesized by Nanak and his followers into Sikhism, one of the most advanced religions of Asia.

>>17611364
>it's a completely shit religion
Well you are going to have to do a better job to convince me other than "it is because I said so".
Why is your opinion not a 'shit opinion' deserving of contempt?

>>17610687
http://www.oocities.org/wu_weifarer/Yijing.html

>>17610585
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COS1yI8ZQZk

>>17608274
What do you mean by Agnosticism? There are several different meanings.

>>17610398
The classic religious texts deserve to be reread.
They are so profound and meaningful, even works written millennia ago can still have spiritual relevance.
Rereading allows for deeper insights and understanding, impossible to achieve in just one reading.
They are like deep wells of wisdom and spiritual truth, there is no reason to only take one sip when you can freely drink to your hearts content.

>>17609921
How do you know that is true?
Would be nice if life can be understood through simple statements, but a 'platitude' seems to carry an additional negative connotation.

>plat·i·tude | \ ˈpla-tə-ˌtüd
>a banal, trite, or stale remark
> a trite, meaningless, or prosaic statement, often used as a thought-terminating cliché
>a flat, dull, or trite remark, especially one uttered as if it were fresh or profound

>>17607598
>Welcome to my fungus web page!
http://botit.botany.wisc.edu/toms_fungi/

>>17609577
The real question is what are you going to do about it?

>>17609682
If you actually read philosophy you would know you are making philosophical truth claims.

>>17605974
>Which one?
One God, many interpretations.

>>17605913
Its God.

>>17605374
hmmmm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89jOPAGJq-M

>>17598573
>The high mission of any art is, by its illusions, to foreshadow a higher universe reality, to crystallize the emotions of time into the thought of eternity.

>>17601543
Define enlightenment first.
Its meaningless to try to achieve it if you dont even know what it is.

>>17602014
You contradict yourself by claiming to know that nobody knows anything.