/lit/ - Literature

>>23217987
Plato was a fag, i had two wives.

>>23217445
Which do you think is more important?, knowing the nature of our souls or the nature of the cosmos?

>>22896954
I truly don't desire sex. That's how I know people have sex

AND ITS THE STARS
THE STARS
WILL SHINE FOR YOU
AND ITS THE STARS
AND THE STARS
WILL LIE TO YOU

I will make you sing and dance with me my shadow

Ouro never changes
No more sad voices
Rmemeber it's just different scene
Looking at you through the glass
Sitting all alone inside your head - you

>>22896954
Are you mad
haven't I already shown you what happens when I win?
Give up. It's a draw. I can't give up. You can though.

>>22896954
>thinks Anonymous needs sex or family values when anon craves power aka the power to change his own consciousness
Nothing's changed though :^)

>>22896954
>thinks I
When I'm done with you I'm going to dance in a suit

>>22896925
muh genes are holding me back!

>>22896928
did you know to draw an ugly figure one must go to a dark place in his mind making his imagination ugly and his roads uglier.

"I am a great thinker" - Jesus.

>>22896923
Your god lied.

"It is not good for the man to be alone" so God teared a rib out of his creation of himself.

"I aM PAUL AND I LECTURE YOU ON SIN AND UNSIN. NOT YOUR MORAL COMPASS OR DIRECTION IF YOU ARENT BORN A CORINTHIAN THEN NAME YOUR CHILD AFTER DAVID OUR KING INSTEAD OF A GOD DAMN RIVER HADES YOUR TRADITIONAL BELIEFS ARE NOTHING COMPARED TO MY NEW RELIGION THAT I MYSELF HAVE INVENTED."

So, Christians, why don't incels have sex? Isn't it appointed that all man should have a right to property? And why is it that women have voices that respond only to chad? Either I'm an incel or all the good men are incels, i.e. letting women grow up in the society they are conditioned and letting them choose. No such thing as a good woman, it's like pretending you are Jesus. No one is Jesus. Not even Jesus is jesus, yet people still believe in him after many years of the death of pagan gods.

And so I point my finger to you at my disgust.

>>22569926
But anon, what makes something holy? What I mean is this: what is it that is common to all the gods such that they all, being different, are said to be the same thing, that is, holy?

>>22405824
you shouldn't have backwards to the eye. when I see them I always sound two. but you also have to black for your concept.

ARISTOTLE FUCKING POISONED SOMEONE AND YOU FAGGOTS ARE FUCKING LAUGHING. IGNORE THE FACT THAT ARISTOTLE FUCKING POISONED SOMEONE LIKE THE REST OF ACADEMIA, YEAH, THAT MAKES TOTAL FUCKING SENSE. FUCK YOU AND FUCK ACADEMIA A THOUSAND TIMES. THIS SHIT ACCUTUALLY MAKES ME SEETHE WITH SO MUCH RIGHTEOUS ANGER. THE CONQUEROR OF ALL THE KNOWN WORLD WAS ASSASSINATED BY SOME SHADY ACADEMIC.
>>20510426
>he claims Aristotle killed Alexander with, from all the way in Athens
YOU DISINGENUOUS PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT. ARISTOTLE DIDN'T DELIVER THE POISON HIMSELF (BECAUSE OF COURSE THAT PUSSY WOULDN'T); HE HAD CASSANDER, THE SON OF ANTIPATER, PASS ALEXANDER THE POISON; ****THE SAME ANTIPATER WHO ARISTOTLE WOULD LATER NAME AS THE EXECUTOR OF HIS FUCKING WILL****. NOPE, NOTHING STRANGE GOING ON HERE!!!! NOT TO MENTION THAT ALEXANDER THREW ARISTOTLE'S FUCKING NEPHEW, CALLISTHENES, INTO PRISON (WHERE HE DIED LIKE A BITCH) AFTER HE WAS CAUGHT TRYING TO ASSASSINATE ALEXANDER JUST AS ARISTOTLE HIMSELF WOULD LATER SUCCED IN DOING!!!! THINK ARISTOTLE HAD ANY HARD FEELINGS ABOUT THAT ONE? MAKE NO MISTAKE, ARISTOTLE WAS A SHADY AND NEFARIOUS BASTARD, AND HE WOULD GO TO ANY LENGTHS TO GET WHAT HE WANTED.
THE FACT THAT YOU GUYS ARE TOO BLINDED BY THE PRO-ARISTOTLE ESTABLISHMENT'S PROPAGANDA TO SEE WHAT'S RIGHT INFRONT OF YOUR EYES IS HONESTLY PISSING ME THE FUCK OFF. READ THE FUCKING SOURCES YOU FUCKING FAGGOTY ASS PSEUDS OR JUST DO THE WORLD A FAVOUR AND KYS YOU FUCKING ARISTOTLE SHILLS.

>>20510643
There should be one book right? I'm aware of none really. Perhaps for that reason I should write one myself. I've had to find these excerpts myself. I came to this conclusion only after deep meditation and basic pattern recognition. Academia really is full of NPCs.

>>20511908
> Whoa, bro! Hagnothemis didn't give the fucking biochemical makeup of the specific poision that Aristotle used but instead attempted to give a very natural description understandable to anybody, so now I guess that means it didn't actually happen and we should just ignore everything he said!
Just fucking listen to yourself. I really hope you are being disingenuous, for your sake.

>>20510697
The word has a negative connotation which existed even in their time. These faggots aren't any better than the professional teachers who just wanted some compensation for their work just because they don't ask for money, they're just not as as bad as they could have been if they actually charged for their word-game nonsense; on the other hand, instead of asking for money, they all clearly sought out some sort of villainous political influence which they all got in their special way (and which all backfired back on them in their own special ways; and some not as badly as they SHOULD HAVE I might add).
>>20510426
>>20511283
I'm sorry, are you here to deboonk the statement, Snopes? Do you have any sources to back up the debooking? No? Oh? it just sounds weird? Yeah, he's definitely a good excuse not to pay attention to these primary sources which many people took seriously.
>>20511298
>Alexander was a degenerate
Are you telling me that the "le everything in moderation" guy failed him on that very account? curious...
>and deserved it.
Aristotle destabilised an entire empire for nefarious purposes. Nothing the people did deserved that.
>>20511309
What? Like Aristotle did in his Politics? uh oh, guess he was le filtered!! XD
kys.

>>20509915
Aristotle didn't advocate for Plato's """"utopia"""", retard. And Socrates's society was also a shitty DYSTOPIA. You'd know all this if you bothered to read any of them. Go ahead, read them. I recommend them. Peer into the mind of professional self-interested sophists who also happen to be psychotic ideologues.

>>20509521
It was poison you disingenuous fuck. People weren't fucking stupid, they knew that Aristotle studied these things and was generally a really nefarious and shady person. He did his part, so what do you gain from defending him is my question?

>>20509261
Did you really miss this?:
> At this point you're just conceding my point.
It's not even worth entertaining what philosophical interest there is in the proposition that "one who is aware of his ignorance knows at least that he is ignorant" to argue because 1.) it isn't an interesting proposition worthy of any deep philosophical investigation and 2.) you are simply conceding that Socrates had nothing to say but trite platitudes, which he used to to make it less obvious that he was not able to contribute anything of rational content that wasn't sophistical to an argument.
> He was ignorant
> Nuh-uh, actually! he knew one thing!!1!
Ok? irrelevant to the conversation. I'm saying that Socrates knew nothing besides. If you agree then you have conceded my point. In this case Socrates should just shut the fuck up if he knows he has nothing intelligent to say about anything. So here we are: Either Socrates was not being intellectually honest (only engaging in conversations he had a clue about or at least warning people if he didn't) or he was sure he knew more than he really did.
> Repeats Socratic buzzword hoping it will make him wiser
Pathetic. It's clear that you are the sad being who thinks he knows something when in fact it is he who suffers from the meanest ignorance imaginable. You don't know shit but would like to associate with people who (you misguidedly think) do. I attack your idols and you can't help but try to defend them. You were brainwashed, and refuse to see through the propaganda. You say "We are both ignorant, but you attack Socrates, therefore you are worse." What a fucking joke it is that you want to talk about people pretending about anything. You get mad that "Fuck off, faggot." is not an argument, but you have yet to refute any of mine. Again, Pathetic.

City of pigs indeed! Where does he get off?!

>>20509173
> He knew that he knew nothing, thus knew something, did he not?
I mean knowledge of philosophical interest.
> inb4 b-but that is of philosophical interest
Fuck off, faggot. At this point you're just conceding my point.
> What do you know then?
That Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were self-promoting charlatan hacks who subverted Ancient Greek civilization and terrorized the noble people to further their silly ideological beliefs.

>>20509136
> I'm the wisest person because I know that I don't know anything!
Cringiest quote ever. And that faggot nerd really thought he was clever in saying that. Not many people actually claim to know everything, or even act like it. If anyone ever did so, it was Socrates's ilk.
I never claimed to know everything.
Plato, however, was always prideful of his knowledge. And he and Socrates were shameless self-promoters.
Socrates pretended to have knowledge. He did not. He could only needlessly question, subvert, and play sophistical word games. He had no knowledge and thus professed a lot less ignorance than he truly had. Socrates was perhaps one of the most ignorant pseuds in Athens.