/lit/ - Literature

>>20861543
it's not axiomatic. i operate on dialectic. i invite you to the Pneumatic thread and you can easily have at any singular thesis uttered in the over 4,000 word long extremely dense work

it's the most condensed work of knowledge ever written, perhaps
>>20861547
i dont have to prove anything to myself either boyo. im what my trip says. its as simple as that
>you just spew random shit
my shit just escapes your midwittery. that's all
>>20861557
it doesn't jump to that, my pneumatolysis (pneumatological psychoanalysis) of your person jumped to that :)

>>20858831
Begin and end with pneumaticism. It unironically answers the JQ

>>20861481
>This is just Spengler but shittier.
How can it be Spengler but shittier if Spengler didn't predict anything while my theory will hold for eternity.
>>20861509
no religion is ever based

>>20858168
>Problematic Authors
In my novel these are called IPIs. Wanna have a look at the idea behind the novel?

>>20861506
>I told you how you can actually measure if you're not retarded
i don't want to prove to the world that i'm not retarded, i think you're projecting here. i'll leave it at that.
>>20861523
depends. there's the conscious and the subconscious. someone can reject the notion of perennial wisdom consciously but subconsciously still have it. pneumatics is cognizant of psychoanalysis because to understand the code of reality, ultimately, you have to get to the depths of the human (and the animal, in general) psyche

>>20861489
>Nietzsche wanted what Hitler wanted
have you ever actually read Nietzsche? how can you say something so dumb? Nietzsche was just a dumb self-contradicting retard who never actually arrived at any coherent philosophical system because he was too much of a brainlet. but he definitely wouldn't have been a fan of nazi collectivism, resentment, the fucking antisemitism, and what he especially wasn't a fan of was German nationalism

it's like you've never even read Nietzsche and don't understand what he disliked about Wagner

>>20861477
you have discovered the same thing as this guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXD9HnrNrvk
you have not discovered Life. perhaps you simply don't have it. perhaps you have severe autism or ASPD. as i said, deeply mentally ill hylics are unchangable, likewise, people without empathy will not respond well to pneumatics

>>20861449
You might have ASPD, or autism.

What's more probable on 4chan?

>>20861432
Pneumatic enlightenment. The Kali Yuga doesn't last 400-whatever years. It ends with the Dark Age that will follow the current demographic crisis.

As a note, gnostics (psychics/pneumatics) cannot be deeply mentally ill. That is one condition. I listed several other conditions in earlier manifestos detailing the doctrine.

>>20861438
the biggest scare is that there's not enough wise consumers.
that there's not enough consumers is not the biggest scare, simply the cause of the Cataclysm which we all will have to go through if we don't wisen up beforehand. the cut-off point is diffuse but I place it around 2045 before shit is either already solved or inevitable.

>>20861428
>Okay, so essentially everyone except those who view life exactly as you do and act upon exactly those beliefs are imperfect consumers.
Not really. It comes down to something called perennial wisdom, which is inside of us, and in the most banal form stems from the instinct of self-preservation, which is simply Life's anti-entropy conceptualized.

I think that ALL (more or less) mentally healthy hylics can have their perennial wisdom unlocked, thus, and it cannot be unlocked only if the hylic is deeply mentally ill (for example, if the hylic is a true-trans, i.e. brain-maps a hole where there is a protuberance, or the opposite)

>>20861366
>>20861371
>>20861374
>>20861377
>>20861381
>>20861387
>>20861401
>>20861402
>>20861406
>>20861409
>>20861416
>>20861417
>>20861423
all retards

>>20861403
>schizo
Again, I implore:
name a SINGLE incongruence with objective reality across the entire over 4,000 word long essay/proto-manifesto

so long as you don't, yours is no argument

>>20861408
have you ever uttered a single novel thought in your life? i have. have you?

think about this question deeply for a moment

>>20861405
>>subjectively choose ... because objective code of reality
the code of reality is objective (life is a capital-a Algorithm, Algorithms are anti-entropic systems, it's all elaborated in the thread)

my subjective choice is Life. that's all. perhaps it's predetermined (muh determinism). do i care? i sure as hell don't want myself or my species to die out prematurely and simply consider myself a mystic to have gone beyond material programming.

cheers

>>20861393
>What is an imperfect consumer?
Psychics and pneumatics are actual "imperfect consumers." Psychics are just inactive pneumatics, people who know the Truth on an instinctual level and will keep to the Truth no matter what, but who either do not know the whole Truth or don't have the energy to pursuit transformation of material reality in accordance with the Truth (which was Plato's, and Hegel's, and my dream)

Hylics, matter-dwelling beings, are Perfect Consumers. Even if in their head they might think not, it is in their actions that they reveal their hylic form.

I should depart from gnostic terminology as I reject gnosticism (as I reject all religion) but... parts of the gnostic mythos are just too convenient!

>>20861386
There is only either atheism or pantheism. The ultimate redpill is that this distinction doesn't matter, and I subjectively choose pantheism because I found an objective code of reality. Anti-entropy. And I found a metaphysical cosmogony of (and for) Humanity that fulfills me on a deeply "spiritual" (metaphysical) level. It is at that point that the distinction stops making sense.

>>20861382
By opposing modernity, you're an Imperfect Consumer.
But what are your actions?
How do you distinguish yourself from the Perfect Consumer through your actions?

You will judge them by their fruit.

>>20861372
I already analyzed everything and you won't school me.
>>20860035
already explains everything. even Life and Consciousness and the objective metaphysical imperative of modern humanity. forgetfulness of the bigger picture will lead to a catastrophe.

>>20861367
It is objectively beneficial. This was obvious already to the Ancients. You are embarrassing. Start with the Greeks or start with the pneumatics here:
>>20860035

>>20861369
Just statistical probability. There is a 99% chance you're an Imperfect Consumer conditioned to be the Perfect Consumer. Welcome to globohomo, the Desert of the Real

>>20861364
(and sociological trends)
>>20861365
and you feel smart even though you haven't even progressed beyond Plato's teacher. you haven't even read the Republic but pretend to know Aurelius. why would you do that?

>>20861360
>Why do you assume this?
It shows in demographic trends.

>>20859958
The ultimate redpill is that Freud was a good guy and Jung was a hack and Lacan was the best guy.

Get into pneumatics, bitch.