/lit/ - Literature

Being away from none other than the never ceasing rainbow strings belonging to sounds and klangs which violently appropriate themselves as a sort of phallic perpetrator: of which I speak now: It, the sound, was existing predominately in a corridor of some kind and in other places as well: Planets, not existing with out other phenomena to interact with, red and pink like a pig's urethra, sky-purple imposing itself upon metal wheel and other minerals machination when it interacted with an abode of selling and purchasing. Crashing cars crashing through the parking area, window saying "hi" to various somebodies out walking the monkey, not only nightmare but also. Singles nor beings with others, they did not let us go through, not letting new things take place, not letting things be seen and interacted with, from Germany, never disappearing.

Entering upon the place, figure of some height, not accustomed to the foreign wetbacks that were there, chained with chains to other chains and so on, toward which they shouted certain things of unknown, to which were many things replied of unknown sounds and noise and klangs, ideas of racist remarks emerging in the minds, no doubt, surrounding clouds acting as dancing, but the sound never muffled. It was then said: certain figures are in a state of perpetual motion, but paralytic motion. Of this condition: Higher on it went, birthing new ideas, infinitely and in a vacuum, not being superior but inferior to the previous games of catch and snatch, toward which I personally had no qualms, the notion of playing rap battle with moriarty was never my 'cup of pee', others may be drinking urine of that lion, but I was not one of those wetbacks, only my mother did sell dairy products, allowing only for specific kinds of babble, in which the state was never fully realised, only enforced, thesis being our navel was not entirely sold, Yoghurt being quite expensive in 1812, the sections of the robotic rhinoceros which allowed it to exist, toward which we had the most ambivalence, searching for ways to sell it in some way, but being painfully aware of our lack of sentience when it comes to selling marbles, for which we were told we had to know certain things about IBM, thesis being IBM was a difficult customer, raspberries themselves not so easy to deal with, flavouring other things, such as one final trip away from.

Such a trip was but to come: As we sailed away from the abode, the location existed singularly and for itself, finally drifting and dissipating in to nothingness, tripping in to a blur and remaining unlaced, away from this place and from a new country, some where in africa.

>>2415133

CAN YOU NOT READ?

HELLO, "POSTERS" OF /lit/.

I HAVE SEARCHED IN "REAL LIFE", AND AT THE WORLD WIDE WEB, FOR RELATIVELY UNBIASED BOOKS RE THE ZIONIST "PURGE" OF MOST OF THE "ROYAL FAMILIES" OF THE WORLD, THAT REPRESENTED A POTENTIAL THREAT TO THE "ZIONIST AGENDA".

I HAVE NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN MY SEARCH.

DOES ANYONE HERE KNOW WHERE CAN I ACQUIRE RELATIVELY UNBIASED BOOKS RE "THE ZIONIST 'PURGE' OF MOST OF THE 'ROYAL FAMILIES' OF THE WORLD"?

" "

"COCA COLA" IS CALLED "COKE" BECAUSE IT CONTAINED AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER THE ILLICIT SUBSTANCE "COCAINE"

>>2197773
I "SAW" "IT" ON AN "ANCIENT" CHAN; THE LAST POST OF WHICH OCCURED IN LATE 2010

"TESTING"

I LIKE THIS THREAD. TEN OUT OF TEN IN MY SCALE.

ALL MY FAVORITE AUTHORS REACHED THEIR ARTISTIC PEAK IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. NOT ALL MY FAVORITE AUTHORS WERE BORN IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. I LIKE SOME CONTEMPORARY AUTHORS BUT THEY DO NOT COMPARE ARTISTICALLY TO "MY FAVORITE AUTHORS".

GET "LIFE EXPERIENCE".

>>1990029

NO, NOT "IMPLYING" COMMA BUT EXPLICITLY TYPING THE COMMA.

"NO MAMES, WEY".

"WEY, NO MAMES" IS VALID TOO BUT IS LESS FREQUENTLY USED THAN "NO MAMES, WEY".

[/thread]

WHEN DID YOU WRITE THIS?

I MILDLY LIKED IT.

A SENTENCE.

>>1946952
>>1946928
>>1946925

>JONATHAN SAFRAN FOER.
>JONATHAN SAFRAN.
>JONATHAN FRANSAN.
>JONATHAN FRANZEN.

"OFICINA LIBRE".

WRITE TO THEM A "VERY SPECIFIC PAGES LONG PAPER".

>>1915641
>ING

>theory that the world's population is split up into creators and consumers.

I STOPPED READ AT THE END OF THAT SENTENCE. "THE WORLD'S POPULATION" CAN BE "CLASSIFIED" INTO VIRTUALLY THOUSANDS OF CATEGORIES & SUBCATEGORIES OF VIRTUALLY ANY KIND. WHO EVER THOUGHT AND EXPLAINED THE "THEORY" THAT YOU TELL ABOUT IS NOT A VERY INTUITIVE PERSON AND PROBABLY NOT VERY ANALYTICAL EITHER.