/lit/ - Literature

rip city, homes

>>21526592
It's like you're not really reading, but I'll give you one benefit of doubt:
Which one/s and why?

>>21526565
Forgot the reason: I need more/new/other reasons to hate other people.

Since y'all 'ave dicks in fingies, I'll start off lazily with a dutch psychiatrist.

Who want's to talk books?
brb blood sugar's 1.6mM
whatre u readn n fokin y

quite a few, http://godcock.neocities.org/lit.html

>>19604814
Response the the schizo joke. Very low-effort post on a reread. Never you mind. Doesn't really matter in the end, we're all a-lone.

>>19603843
vim is dead, and shit. kakoune is great though. if it suits your needs, what do you care?
>>19603824
Thank you for the notice.
>>19603911
I use my time, and don't waste it. Or try to. It can be argued, I'm doing it wrong---skimmed this today, , fucker is wrong bc. coming from 'im-right-ur-wrong', but nice read anyway https://perell.com/essay/against-3x-speed/---, of the the book I found significant, I can recall ideas, plot points or story arcs, authors' styles or writing, my mood and situation in life.

They do lock up though, never ever agree to anything from the state, for fuck's sake.

649 titles currently done.
godcock.neocities.org/lit.html

all these i remember as rather long
les miserables
bowling alone
the fourth turning
the iron pillar
lives of eminent philosophers
the illuminatus, all 3 are 240k
american gods
the big fat surprise
david deutsch's horrible books

a few others over 100k

Quite a few.
https://godcock.neocities.org/lit.html

>>19501682
For lit, it's big. I am simultaneously overshooting, and undershooting (if that's not a verb, now it is).

>>19499482
Wow, all but 5 posts got filtered. I really do despise all of you cosmicly stupid, naive, inane, complacent, comformist, predictable cunts.

the little by sotos avaiable through libgen (underway bookz has fuckall, archive as well, gutenberg needs like 50 more years, torrents have nothing), david deutsch's shit book, the soverign individual, some john douglas mark olshaker books hopefully they aren't all shit, and maybe a few more little novels by matt shaw and edward lee before i get back to mises and other shit, gotta the illuminatus! 2 - the golden apple before ny in any case

KNOWLEDGE, Volumes 1--inf

I'd be alone, in my own 'book club'.
Hence, no, I am not in any actual book clubs.

>>18927472
>How the fuck do you become so well read
It's a process toward an ideal, not a definite, concrete goal, fucktard.
Now get back to reading.

Not much.

the illuminatus

Other than myself, lit shelters no
mature individuals
good-faith ones
serious ones
(non-meme) reading ones
but instead
echochamber faggots
autofellatory faggots
attention whore faggots and furniture faggots as well as stack faggots
highschool faggots
middleschool faggots
and idunno what else, but you're faggot for fucking sure, or my name ain't sally two shoes.

>>18891770
in next century. Fuck me for hurrying.
Fuck this board for not replying.

>>18891632
You don't seem suited for this board. Or life.
Neck yourself.

Both are about the obdurate nature of marxism and its degenerate derivatives.

Mises present economic theory, explanations of the state of affairs in mid 20. century, and foretells much of what happens in up to and most especially now.

Havel's is a sober and sharp observation of the state of affairs in certral europe, czekoslovakia, about how to fight back. Very relevant to all countries touched by socialism and its ilk, particularly eastern europe, germany, and select other centraleuro ones.
It's rather short compared to the Mises tome.

Prescience.
Quote is from
>The Power of the Powerless, Václav Havel
2. or 3. week reading
>Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War, Ludwig von Mises
going too slow, because it's so depressing, and heavy, that I keep transgressing with full-lenth fiction novels.