/lit/ - Literature

>>20660534
ur soft

>>20660236
ngmi

>>20660145
idk what the hell that means but good luck with your endeavors

>>20660122

>>20660008

>>20658620
It’s cool, hit me up
Plenty of muzzies in one of them

>>20658551
Actually I can add you
DagoItaka#9953

>>20658559
Initiation*

>>20658528
He immediately sniffed me out when I started talking about the counter-imitation lol

>>20658528
He’s in one of them

The Romanianfag will add you (I’m too much of a 30 yo boomer to work discord)
JuIian#2309

>>20658441
Guenonfag needs to grace his presence in the /trad/ discord server

>>20657522
Hello Wagner chad
I enjoyed the Ian Dallas book you recommended two months ago

>>20657163
Where is the grail?

>>20657634
lol dude don't bother

>>20655608
>Also you should read Böhme
I feel like I hear more Eastern Trads talk about him than Western Trads

>>20657356
He also included Levantines too
I think it’s in the opening chapter of intro to Hindu doctrines

(Taleb redeemed!)

>>20657000
if you want to think that it's fake and gay then that's up to you
pseud take tho

>>20656960
you have never read it

>>20656889
sneedch criticizes 'atomistic' materialism as well as scientism
he doesn't entirely discard metaphysics either - he just has an aversion to 'otherworldliness'

if you want his views then read the last section of Will to Power:
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52915/52915-h/52915-h.htm

tl;dr he views the universe as sort of a power plane

>>20655749
On it

>>20655724
There are two types of anon on /lit/:
Those who have contributed to the Guenon Magazine and those who have not

>>20656520
what did he mean by this then?

>What is essentially at stake is to bring out the elements which, in the Roman tradition, seem to go back directly to the time when the peoples that we have agreed to call "Indo-Europeans" had not yet been divided into several distinct branches, so each was subsequently to pursue its existence independently of the others.
-Traditional Forms and Cosmic Cycles

@guenonfag

>>20652702
>he was a materialist
not really