/lit/ - Literature

>>3586388

>>3583915
When you have a picture as biased as the one in the op, it's a sure sign not to argue with that person.

>>3580270
>reading

>>3572982
>says the person with the thousands of dollars of books he either won't read again, or hasn't read yet. While I sit here with over 10x the amount his library has grossing at forty dollars in total
E-readers have very different screens than the type you're used to seeing on computers and televisions. For instance they're not LCD and they don't contain a backlight. Please stop arguing against something you clearly have no knowledge about.

>>3578280
I favour using single quotation marks as a way to distinct a sign in the sentence.

>>3578254
Joyce uses the emdash for dialog as well.

>>3578248
Does it demerit her work? It can add to it, if done correctly.

>>3578244
how?

>>3557138
>>3557121
The both of you are making specious claims without any evidence in regards the Library of Alexandria. It's a commonly well known argument as to whether or not the Library actually had knowledge.

>>3553417
become a writer

>>3553399
this

>>3548996
Wittgenstein would be with traditional Buddhism.

this site is not exactly how I interpreted the book

it seems a bit too dark and a little too edgy for my likes

'The Loser' is better.

2 is gerrymander, 16 is noisome

It's both irrefutable and indefensible, and therefor not worth bothering arguing about. The only people still concerned with solipsism are those who just finished their first week of Phi. 101.

>>3529500
A lot of scientists agree with, and base their studies off Hume's, and Popper's theories; I don't understand why you would suggest them. Wittgenstein never tackled science as a method either, so that's an odd suggestion as well. A good person to look into would have to be Paul Feyerabend, and epistemological anarchism.

>>3524229
Move Kant, Hegel, and Aristotle down one.

Move Kierkegaard up one.

Add Popper, Derrida, and Moore in rat tier. As well adding Hobbes into good tier.

And it'll be perfect.

I heard the sticky is a good place to start.

>"Fuck Pessoa."

>"Started but did not finish, far too up it's own arse."

>these reviews

>>3517105
Not even morality can solve this puzzle.

A coughing blew out the exhaust.

>>3516115
It's not for the sake of being controversial, but when some works are undermined for politically incorrect passages, it's a bit ridiculous. Heart of Darkness would be the obvious example where people only read the book at face value, and think it's about negatively portraying the African people.

>>3516091
Anything that would be detrimental to children is usually frowned upon in art.