/lit/ - Literature

IF I CAN AVOID REALITY AT WILL, BUT CANNOT AVOID THE CONSEQUENCES OF AVOIDING REALITY, DOES THAT ENTAIL THAT THE CONSEQUENCES ARE NOT PART OF REALITY?

IF SO, WHY NOT?

HOW ARE THEY NOT PART OF REALITY?

WOULD THAT ENTAIL THAT A HYPERREALITY IS PRODUCED BY THE CONSEQUENCES OF AVOIDING REALITY?

WHY CAN I NOT AVOID THE CONSEQUENCES OF AVOIDING REALITY IN THE FIRST PLACE?

HELLO.

WHAT DO YOU THINK IS DONNA TARTT'S "MBTI" TYPE?

THE CATEGORIZATION OF MALES AS "ALPHA", OR "BETA", IS A SPURIOUS ONE; IT IS AN ATAVISM OF PALEOLITHIC SOCIETIES.

FOR TWENTY DOLLARS?

NOT FEASIBLE AT ALL.

>>4312562

I THANK YOU.

>>4312532

NOONE WANTS TO READ A BOOK IN IMAGES.

HOW WOULD THAT BE EASIER TO DISTRIBUTE THAN JUST UPLOADING IT TO A FILESHARING WEBSITE?

>>4312517

WHY DO YOU NOT JUST UPLOAD THE ARCHIVE TO "MEDIAFIRE", OR "MEGA"?

IF YOU ARE GOING TO SHARE IT FREE OF CHARGE, AT LEAST DO IT PROPERLY –WHY WOULD YOU TAMPER WITH IT?

>>4312500

IN WHAT FORMAT IS THE ARCHIVE?

>>4312489

AH.

CAN YOU CURRENTLY SEND "INVITES"?

IF SO, SEND ME ONE, AND I WILL PAY YOU.

>>4312472

ENGLISH, PLEASE.

DID YOU TAKE THAT SCREENCAPTURE?

IF SO, WHY DO YOU NOT DOWNLOAD IT?

IS THAT "WHAT.CD"?

THE SEVEN ERAS OF EUROPA:

– EUROPA I.

FROM EIGHT CENTURY BCE TO SECOND CENTURY BCE.

– EUROPA II.

FROM SECOND CENTURY BCE TO FIFTH CENTURY CE.

– EUROPA III.

FROM FIFTH CENTURY CE TO FOURTEENTH CENTURY CE.

– EUROPA IV.

FROM FOURTEENTH CENTURY CE TO EIGHTEENTH CENTURY CE.

– EUROPA V.

FROM EIGHTEENTH CENTURY CE TO TWENTIETH CENTURY CE.

– EUROPA VI.

FROM TWENTIETH CENTURY CE. TO TWENTYTFIRST CENTURY CE.

– EUROPA VII.

FROM YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TO YEAR 20XX…

MOST “EPIPHANIES” OCCUR WHILST DEFECATING.

I REALIZED THAT NOT WHILST DEFECATING, BUT WHILST READING RE: HOW THE CONCEPT OF “PROTESTANTISM” OCCURRED TO MARTIN LUTHER, AND I REALIZED THAT MANY IDEAS, HYPOTHESES, AND “EPIPHANIES” OCCURRED TO ME WHILST DEFECATING.

RUSSIAN IS ONE OF THE "TOP" THREE MOST USELESS & IMPRACTICAL LANGUAGES THAT EXIST.

>"LIFE IS TOO SHORT TO LEARN RUSSIAN."

– PROTOPHANES.

>>4308156
>"any principal character perceived to have or claiming power or powers they don't (within the world of the book) actually have".

YHWV/ALLAH IS A MAIN CHARACTER WHO IS PERCEIVED TO HAVE, AND CLAIMS TO HAVE POWERS THAT IT DOES NOT ACTUALLY HAVE, WITHIN THE WORLD OF THE BOOKS, WHICH IS THE WORLD IN WHICH YOU ARE LIVING NOW, BUT MANY YEARS INTO THE FUTURE.

"THE BIBLE".

"THE QUORAN".

"THE TORAH".

THE MAIN DEITY IN THOSE BOOKS IS THE SAME DEMIOURGOS.

THE ONLY PROBLEM THAT I SEE IS THAT YOU ARE JEALOUS.

>"I am poor & wretched, and it is God's fault. I love you God. Amen."

– LEON DOSTOYEVSKY IN ALL HIS NOVELS, AND NOVELLAS.

I CONCUR WITH HOWARD PHILLIPS LOVECRAFT.

>>4305657

MARIE CALLOWAY IS A "MARXIST", SO I ASSUME THAT SHE CONDONES HER NOVEL BEING SHARED FREE OF CHARGE.

AYN RAND –"ATLAS SHRUGGED".

JEROME DAVID SALINGER –"THE CATCHER IN THE RYE".

HELLO.

I HAVE A HYPOTHESIS THAT MIGHT EXPLAIN WHY JEROME DAVID SALINGER MADE “HOLDEN CAULFIELD” –AND HIS FAMILY– A “GINGER”, AND WHY AYN RAND MADE “HOWARD ROARK” AN “ORANGEHEAD”.

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN “HOLDEN CAULFIELD”, AND “HOWARD ROARK”:

>THEY HAVE “REDDISH”/”ORANGE” HAIR COLOUR.
>THEIR FIRST NAMES BEGIN WITH THE LETTER “H”.
>THEY ARE OVERLY INDIVIDUALISTIC; EGOTISTS.
>THEY ARE ANOMALIES IN THEIR RESPECTIVE HABITATS.
>THEY SMOKE.
>THEY DRINK ALCOHOL.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN “HOLDEN CAULFIELD”, AND “HOWARD ROARK”:

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” IS HYPEREMOTIONAL.
>”HOWARD ROARK” IS HYPOEMOTIONAL.

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” IS OVERLY CONCERNED WITH OTHER PERSONS’ BEHAVIOR.
>”HOWARD ROARK” IS INDIFFERENT TOWARD OTHER PERSONS.

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” IS A TRADITIONALIST WHO DISLIKES CHANGE.
>”HOWARD ROARK” IS A PROGRESSIVIST WHO DESPISES STAGNATION.

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” WANTS TO PRESERVE.
>”HOWARD ROARK” WANTS TO REFORM.

THEY ARE OPPOSITE FACETS OF THE SAME ARCHETYPAL QUALITY; “THE EGO”.

"HOLDEN CAULFIELD" FITS THE "INNOCENT" ARCHETYPE.

"HOWARD ROARK" FITS THE "HERO" ARCHETYPE.

"HOLDEN CAULFIELD" REPRESENTS THE "SATTVA" (PURITY) "GUNA" OF VEDIC PHILOSOPHY.

"HOWARD ROARK" REPRESENTS THE "RAJAS" (MOTION) "GUNA" OF VEDIC PHILOSOPHY.

"HOLDEN CAULFIELD" IS VISHNU, THE PRESERVER & SUSTAINER.

"HOWARD ROARK" IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD SHIVA, THE CREATOR & DESTROYER.

HYPOTHESIS:

THE “TUATHA DE DANNAN” WERE A RACE OF NONHUMAN BEINGS, REGARDED AS DEITIES IN IRISH MYTHOLOGY. THEY ALL HAD “RED” HAIR.

JEROME DAVID SALINGER WAS FIFTY PERCENT (50%) IRISH.

PERHAPS AYN RAND, AND JEROME DAVID SALINGER, INDEPENDENTLY MADE THEIR CHARACTERS HAVE “REDDISH”/”ORANGE” HAIR, TO BE HOMOLOGOUS TO THE “TUATHA DE DANNAN”.

THAT IS A USELESS "POLL".