/lit/ - Literature

WHO THE FUCK CARES?

STOP SPAMMING THE BOARD, AND POISONING YOUR MIND, WITH NIETZSCHE SCHIZOBABBLE.

UN ANGLO ARGENTO,

CON MÁS PLUMA QUE MUSA:

ESE ES BOBORGES.


« 零 »

>WHY DOES /lit/ HATE THIS SEXUAL DEGENERATE HOMOSEXUAL SOPHIST THAT HAS BEEN SHILLED BY ESTABLISHED ACADEMIA FOR OVER HALF A CENTURY!?

CONFIDENCE IN ONE'S OWN WORK IS A CONSEQUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE OF ONE'S OWN PROFICIENCY.

IF YOU ARE NOT CONFIDENT IN YOUR WORK, IT IS BECAUSE YOU KNOW THAT IT IS TRASH.

YOU CAN START BY CEASING TO POST THAT DUMB CARTOON.

>>23318409


YOU ARE DELUSIONAL.

EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM IDEOLOGICAL IDIOCY.

>>23318380


?

>>23318365


MY HYPOTHETICAL SELF IN THE CIRCUMSTANNCE POSED IN THE ORIGINAL POST OF THIS THREAD.

WHY DO YOU ASK?

>WHY DO YOU CATEGORIZE AUTHORS INTO MALE, AND FEMALE? HOW IS THAT PERTINENT TO THEIR LITERARY QUALITY? ARE YOU A GLOBALISTIC AVTOMATON?

THE FORMAL FACTOR OF POESY IS METER, NOT RHYME.

>>23314418


THAT IS A PROBLEM PARTICULAR TO YOU; THAT IS NOT HOW THE BODY WORKS; THERE IS NO BIOLOGICAL NECESSITY FOR THE PERIODICAL PURGE OF SEMINAL FLUID.

>>23314363


ONLY THE FIRST CLAUSE OF THE PARAGRAPH IS TRUE; THE REST IS SCHIZOBABBLE.

>>23315516


JANITORS DO NOT HAVE POWER TO BANISH.

>>23315153


ALEJANDRA PIZARNIK WAS A MANIC DEPRESSIVE CRINGEWORTHY BROODING WHINING IDIOT; DOROTHY PARKER WAS IRONICAL, CLEVER, HILARIOUS, INSIGHTFUL: NOTHING ALIKE.

AN OILY PISTON, YOU PUSH, YOU PULL;

A FECAL POOL MY RECTVM; MY RECTVM YOU PUMP FULL.

>>23312044


BECAUSE YOUR MOTHER WAS ON AN INTERMITTENT FASTING REGIME DURING THE NINE MONTHS THAT YOU WERE IN HER WOMB.

>>23313921


IF YOU DO THAT, YOU WILL APPROACH THINGS WITH NAIVE —IDIOTIC— LITERARY BIASES THAT WILL ONLY HINDER YOU FROM ACTUALLY PERFORMING WELL AT ANY GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES.

EXONERATE THE BOOKNERD DEMON FROM YOUR BODY.

>>23313899


ONE EXPERIENCES LIFE BY LIVING, NOT BY READING.

>>23313283


NO.


OBVIATING POETICAL TALENT, AND POETICAL SKILL, TO WRITE WELL, ONE NEEDS TO READ, AND TO LIVE.

QUANDO EU MORRER, E DEUS, O NOSSO SENHOR, LEVE ME PARA A ETERNIDADE, BUSCAREI A MINHA MENTORA LISPECTOR, E CONVERSAREMOS NA GRAÇA DIVINA PELOS SÉCULOS DOS SÉCULOS.

>>23311716


SMOKE HERBAL CIGARETTES.

ERA UNA TARDE INANE CUANDO MI AMIGO IMAGINARIO RECOMENDOME —ASÍ, DE LA NADA— QUE LEYERA LAS OBRAS DE ROBERTO BOLAÑO.

—MÁS PREFERIRÍA A ROBERTO GÓMEZ BOLAÑOS —REPLIQUELE.

—SU NOVELA «2666» ES IMPORTANTÍSIMA.

—MEJOR: PREFERIRÍA TRAGAR BUÑUELO.

—ES UNA DE LA VOCES HISPANOAMERICANAS MÁS EMINENTES DE LA LITERATURA UNIVERSAL.

—MEJORÍSIMO: RASCARME EL ANO EN EL BAÑO.

MI AMIGO IMAGINARIO YA NO RESPONDIÓ MÁS QUE ESTO:

—ERES UN PENDEJO.

ASÍ, DE LA NADA, DISIPOSE; FUE HACE CINCO AÑOS —MEDIO DECENIO—: NO HE VUELTO A VERLO; GUARDO LA EXPECTATIVA DE VERLO, AUNQUE SEA UNA VEZ MÁS, ANTES DE QUE MI ÁNIMA VIAJE A EL PURGATORIO.

>>23310573

>Can your family even read?

?

I WAS NOT AWARE THAT ONE HAD TO FOUND A «CLUB», AND CONGREGATE WITH OTHERS IN ORDER TO READ.

THANK YOU FOR THE DATVM.


>Yes it is; the thread involves how to go about analyzing a book.

WHY DO YOU NEED TO A «CLUB» TO ANALYZE A LITERARY WORK?

HOW WOULD YOU EVEN «ANALYZE» ANYTHING IN CONVERSATION WITH OTHERS IN A «CLUB»?

ALL THAT OCCURS IN «CLUBS» IS CHITCHAT.

>>23310329

>[...] you're a romantic chad[...]


?

I DESPISE ROMANTICISM, AND I AM A KEVIN, NOT A CHAD.

HOW IS «LIT GIRL» (SIC) —WHATEVER THAT IS— RELATED TO THAT?

«BOOK CLUBS» ARE MERELY AN EXCUSE FOR THE PATHOLOGICALLY GREGARIOUS TO CONGREGATE; NOTHING TO DO WITH LITERATURE.