[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.8495560 [View]

>>8495119

WHY DO YOU POST A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING A NATIONAL SOCIALIST BUILDING THOUGH?

>> No.8268569 [View]
File: 21 KB, 647x472, VOC30500.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8268569

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/psy

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/pol

>> No.8127839 [View]

>>8127760

NORMALLY, TYPESETTING DESIGN IS RATED ACCORDINGLY, AS THE NECESSARY ASPECT THAT IT IS, NOT MORE, NOT LESS; YOU ARE JUST FETISHIZING IT.

>> No.8116473 [View]

>>8116453

NO, IT IS NOT; THAT IS NOT WHAT THE ORIGINAL POSTER MEANS.

>> No.8116085 [View]

>>8115813

I KNOW WHAT IT IS CALLED, BUT I CANNOT RECALL; IT IS A SPECIFIC KIND OF CATACHRESIS THOUGH.

>> No.7529115 [View]
File: 33 KB, 296x289, AREIZOO.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7529115

WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT TO FIND NOT ONLY SOURCES, BUT EVEN REFERENCES TO THE SOURCES, OR EARLIEST MANUSCRIPTS, FOR THE ALLEGEDLY "ANCIENT" TEXTS?

IS IT DELIBERATE OCCLUSION?

IT IS FRUSTRATING THAT EVEN IN "WORKS" QUESTIONING THE AUTHENTICITY OF SOME ALLEGEDLY "ANCIENT" TEXTS, THE TEXTS' CONDITION AS "ANCIENT" ITSELF IS NOT QUESTIONED, BUT A PRIORI REGARDED AS SUCH.

>> No.7529069 [View]

>>7529020

NO, IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THAT CODEX EITHER.

>> No.7529001 [View]

>>7528888

THE "HIPPIAS MAJOR" IS NOT PART OF THE FIRST SIX TETRALOGIES.

>> No.7528884 [View]

>>7528817

OR OTHERWISE.

>> No.7528797 [View]
File: 6 KB, 139x210, ADLHD LONGHAIR CROP.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7528797

HELLO.

WHAT IS THE EARLIEST KNOWN EDITION OF THE "HIPPIAS MAJOR"?

>> No.7515172 [View]

>>7515151

YOU ARE A MORON, AND YOUR RESPONSE IS NONSEQUITEURIAL.

>> No.7515118 [View]
File: 33 KB, 296x289, AREIZOO.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7515118

>>7515096

"THAETETUS" WHAT?

TO WHICH OF MY QUESTIONS ARE YOU RESPONDING?

EVEN IF YOU WERE RESPONDING TO ONE OF MY QUESTIONS, THAT ALONE IS ONLY A PARTIAL ANSWER, BECAUSE I DOUBT THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE SOURCE FOR THE "FRAGMENTS" OF "ON NATURE", OR ONLY ONE OTHER SOURCE FOR HERACLITUS' LIFE BESIDE DIOGENES LAËRTIUS.

IF YOU WILL NOT ANSWER PROPERLY, DO NOT RESPOND AT ALL; THIS IS ADDRESSED TO ALL.

>> No.7515060 [View]
File: 11 KB, 100x100, AREIZOO 100x100.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7515060

HELLO?

>> No.7514951 [View]

>>7514946
>"YOU DID NOT EVEN COMPREHENDED MY QUESTIONS."

OBVIOUSLY, I MEAN: "YOU DID NOT EVEN COMPREHEND MY QUESTIONS."

>> No.7514946 [View]

>>7514930

YOU DID NOT EVEN COMPREHENDED MY QUESTIONS.

DO NOT RESPOND IF YOU CANNOT EVEN COMPREHEND WHAT YOU READ.

>> No.7514922 [View]
File: 6 KB, 139x210, ADLHD LONGHAIR CROP.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7514922

HELLO.

COULD ANYONE TELL ME WHAT ARE ALL THE ALLEGED SOURCES FOR HERACLITUS’ “FRAGMENTS” OF “ON NATURE”?

WHAT OTHER ALLEGED SOURCES FOR HERACLITUS’ LIFE ARE THERE IN EXISTENCE, BESIDE “LIVES AND OPINIONS OF EMINENT PHILOSOPHERS” BY DIOGENES LAËRTIUS?

>> No.7328833 [View]

>>7328825

WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

>> No.7328821 [View]

>>7328797

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF SUBCONSCIOUS SEXUAL SUGGESTION UPON THE CONSCIOUS MIND.

>> No.7298537 [View]
File: 898 KB, 400x400, image.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7298537

THE CRUX OF THE CHOICE IS NOT WHOM DO YOU PREFER, BUT WHY DO YOU PREFER THE ONE THAT YOU DO; WHETHER YOUR MOTIVES ARE NOBLE, OR IGNOBLE.

>> No.7292749 [View]

>>7292744
>"I DO NOT CHOSE; I AM CHOSEN."

I MEAN: "I DO NOT CHOOSE; I AM CHOSEN.

>> No.7292744 [View]

>>7292666

I DO NOT CHOSE; I AM CHOSEN.

>> No.7292645 [View]

>>7292630

"ATTIRED", OR "GARBED".

>> No.7291348 [View]

>>7291342

NO.

>> No.7291340 [View]
File: 140 KB, 800x480, HNK.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7291340

MY "TOP" THREE FAVOURITE AUTEURS, IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER:

— WESLEY ANDERSON.

— LUCILE HADZIHALILOVIC.

— MICHAEL HANEKE.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]