/lit/ - Literature

>>5477993
Well I'm gone, so you can be king of the sung heap forever.

>>5477987
If I his every shitty thread, the board would be blank. You're not here to discuss literature, you're here to force your insufferable personality onto others. Bye anon, I'm not posting or opening /lit/ ever again

>>5477974
Didn't read, don't care. I'm done with /lit/. You're a cancerous person and I have no business talking with you

I come back after a few months in school and instantly it's a wall of just bitter, angry assholes, shitty threads about stupid bullshit like OP, never any discussion about literature, not even philosophy

/lit/ is dead. You guys can circle jerk over YouTube videos in peace.

>>5477950
saving trole faec? there's nothing to drop. i posted stupid shit in a thread dedicated to stupid shit, you replied with butthurt-filled stupid shit, and now you're acting euphoric over a triviality

>>5477934
really /lit/? you're criticizing someone else for saying worthless things?

>>5477931
not being witty, i'm saying "the sun doesn't move" is demonstrably a stupid thing to say

>>5477909
It takes euphoric knowledge of physics to know that there is no reference frame

>>5477670
>search "vcr tour" on youtube
>post anything good for an elitist giggle at the expense of autistic old finnish men

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z4iw8Ppo1o

>samsung

>>5477728
Being a consumer of suburban housing isn't intelligent

>>5476416
It's not fake when you're reporting shitposts, obviously.

>>5476340
Great thread OP, way to post a topic that encourages discussion and analysis.

>>5368602
Zizek is fine, only people who are morons dismiss him offhand

>>5368572
While I think Dennett is a hack, the truth of the universes determinism does not imply we should view the world reductively

>>5365833
Just retort with the fallacy fallacy, and point out that the conclusion needs to be debated against. If they don't understand, post mockingly of them

>>5365793
Good. I think many people on /lit/ do, the majority demographic seems mostly agnostic and apathetic about the topic which is fine. I just get annoyed by the trolling scientism and Dawkins/Harris posting, there are a few religious people on here that are annoying as fuck and don't accept that Christianity and religion in general are pretty boring outside of a historical perspective

>>5365777
I call all stupid religious arguers fedora to purposefully destroy the meaning

>>5365768
Okay, first off Descartes was accused by his peers of atheism and wrote those sections particularly to prove his devotion to the French Catholics. So no, he wasn't truly "devout". But maybe you're right that the correlation between religiosity and thinking as abstract relations within a single person is false. What I meant really is "religious thinkers" who's primary focus is religion itself. Kant and Descartes both had their influence in secular philosophy.

Ontological arguments for God's existence are always crap

>>5365758
Yeah, did you read Descartes proof for God?

Meditation three is terrible

>>5365719
Are you implying anyone religious is better than not?

Religious people bar none make the cringiest, most fedora "thinkers" ever

>>5359301
Mathematics is language

>>5359259
You have ten seconds to find the explanation and bring it to me

>>5365043
Question: what is a number?

>>5365026
Hegel

Nietzsche

Descartes

>>5364201
Did you ask him why he asked such a poor question then?