/lit/ - Literature

>>1568786
LOLOLLOLOLOL

>>1568753
so like more patches of grey in between?
Also would you think a hint of red would be appropriate?

>>1568769
cheers

>>1568737
T.hanks
does this look better?

>>1568704
lol yeah I troll uuuu !!!!

sadly no. am I'm looking for feedback; as is the state for any shitty cg artist like myself. As I also purvery lit, I would have though you guys know whats best for book design.

>>1568700
THANK YOU
It was actually the original concept. We though about a nebula; inverted the color, adjusted the curves etc.

But my roomate, a physicist, is obessed with the second one. For me, it just reminds me of stale porridge, covered in fungated stool.

Whereas, the first one, i find is more vibrant, yet may come across less sophisticated and more like a hippy, pot-head attempt at the subject matter.

Hence the thread
btw thanks for commented, and do sure to rate, comment and subscribe to shitty CG artist dot com.

>number 2

dear /lit/

designing a cover,
looking for advice
got two seperate designs.
which one do you think is better?

Thank you for the patience and subsequent shitstorm.

yours,
ΩP
>Number 1

>>1568633
THANK YOU SO MUCH.
I blame the UStians, who are perhaps overwhelmed in their new found glory of being able to alter a few things in a language that doesn't belong to them.

>>1568617
>>1568614
please calm down. I still am perplexed as to what is the situation.

>>1568424
Well im english, so what should i do>?

Do you start off with an indent on the first paragraph?

Its the first time i've ever done so, so thats why/

>>1568146
+1 confirmed

>>1565279
>two
>kill me
>>it hurts to live

>>1565269
right, and obv no point going two an agent 1st?

>>1565261
now i realise that "popular" genre does not equal rather large sentences

root@bt: mount it_hurts_to_live.iso

>>1565251
shit
because thats's like tthe whole bokkokok ;_:;;;

>>1565244
Thank you for the response. Would one not assume that by the use of "MS", that the answer was implicated on the first line?

In addition, as I'm sure any half thinking mammal can observe, I have no insight into this industry. Whats worse is that I have a problem with grammar from a medical perspective, but I don't feel that it requires one to parade it as an automatic pass for being completely unable to string sentences together.

>>1565226
I agree. But how else can one ask such simple questions on lit without having to be covered under the garb of an illiterate foreign, inept and uncapable of producing any half plausable statement?

Am I embrassed? Not really, considering that I never bother an English at school. Do I care about my spelling? Not really, thanks to spell-checker.

But should one prejudice such a person? I would argue contray, by the virtue of such petty grammatical questions representing an irrelevant discussion on the qualities of an author. Why bellittle someone on such basic tenets, when surely it is the subjective matter that is more significant?

>>1565222
Thanks for your interest. I have spend a while compiling this. Before I throw in a sample, as you are aware of my position as a writer, may I kindly ask the same from you?

Moreover, what would you like? The foreword? The synopsis? A sample page from the chapter? A suggested book design? etc.

In addition, I don't believe I've understood the tenets of your statement; "Oh ho. Are you planning to sell it?". Without attempting to sound illiterate, perhaps an elaboration of the former statement would be generous?

thanks

>>1565205
Do you edit?

>>1565205
>Genre:
Popular Non-fiction: Atheism vs Theism Category
>Word Count:
84 000 words
>Why london
Convenience I suppose

great i;m the only fucking cunt living in this polluted shit hole right now

theres 7,556,900 people that live here. im sure one person can answer.

Dear /lit/
Are there are London /lit/fags, who are willing to read my MS?

I'm based in Bow.