/lit/ - Literature

>>17858751
I only see it as a way to achieve specific goals, that is, getting recognized more easily if you're happening to simp for butterfag just by any chance and for means of communication.
Then you realize tripfagging is stupid and sign off.

t. signing off

>>17858738
Has this scenario happened in real life

>>17858690
How do you feel about your spike in popularity

>>17858674
That picture was touched by the hand of God.

>>17858544
Unironically this.

Why don't you write your post out instead? Oh, wait, that would require a camera and that's too modern. Maybe a Wacom tablet? Still, too artificial, no graphite or ink of any kind.

Your kind is fucking insufferable.

>>17858487
Don't forget panties

Everyone I know at uni sucks Bloom's dick. With good reason?

>>17857058
As far as I know, the spiritual life is ephemeral and must be chased for minute after minute, but I don't know, maybe Robert Anton Wilson has said something that makes a spiritual life less of a pain.

>>17858122
This entire time I thought you were referring to William Walker Atkinson and confused both.

Greta Thunberg has the hots for him but she's more of an apocalypticist nihilist with ghostwriters. So pretty close.

>>17858336
Imagine your own legacy consisting in stating your gender, and in that regard, you, are fucking retarded.
In that case why should she be the special exception, her books must be flawed unless she secretly has a penis and isn't Esther but Diego

>>17858385
For some reason it just sounds African as fuck to me.

The Pidgin Bible, aka Da Jesus Book is as close as I can get to some black skin tone dialect.

I hope nobody mentions that one book that was popular like 8 years ago

Bill Cosby's HRT isn't very discrete

- Morality
- Purpose
- Personal ethics
>>17858217
Alright Wittgenstein

>>17856411
Sounds like the intro of a story

>>17856395
Theism encompasses a lot of different theological stances. So yeah, I voted theist but I'm probably completely different from the next voter that picked the same and so on.

>>17856388
Thank you

Yeah, I've read their takes on that. I guess you can only take a posture of putting your faith on the stuff in the TR that got omitted in the other codexes as being legitimate and removed for "a reason"

>Homo academics
Yeah there's a ton of them, surprisingly

No, I fucking hate sports and I want to be home alone online, don't speak to me unless we're both drunk and you turn into an ethot archetype

>>17856359
Nothing since you're not providing me any context to reply to, but I will reply anyways.