/lit/ - Literature

>romanticizing the book reading experience
>idealizing the physical book
>[insert le or le-like memae] literary lifestyle
>appealing to traditionalist sensibilities as the legislator of objective virtue on aesthetic preference

Conservatives of sentimentalism are the only true unchanging legion, maintaining status quo is their progressive sacrosanct constitution.

A poem-tribute to our mindhadists (see jihadists).

"Ember this December and dismember last November and remember the shlomo lender."

Pic related: hi5ing big dirt

I have a tripcode in case you didn't notice, silly anonydumbs.

>>7365120
singular e-tea, get rekt
this ain't a haiku, or maybe it is, idk
it's not a messiah it's the actual rupture
ima ride this kneegrow robot to eternity

Singularity.

The peasant was stabbing the angel in the face.

Angel: w-what a-are you doing!ahhh!
Peasant: painting you out of fairy existence.
Angel: w-what is this light, are you becoming an angel?
Peasant: Damn right I am.
Angel: The prophecies were true.
Peasant: Yes they were.
Angel: Yup.

My care is not aligned with your question.
tldr I don't care about the life difficulties you face.

Noticed how my tldr is longer than my "full" answer?
Yes? Stop noticing things, stop being told what to think.

Well yes, "reading" is a form of mind control, I spit all these words into your eyes and your brain drowns in my saliva.
Feel the warmth of the universe that surrounds you gently, caressing your soul, your eternal yellow teeth are not a metaphor, they're quite literal.
Vampire!!

I'd call you pathetic for romanticizing a sub-excuse of an attempted artistic fuckery but fortunately, you're not an integral component of your own self, go fuckwards and then turn left, I like you.

>>5759759
I usually do not respond to fans but you're a lucky cookie.
Self-importance is exactly what a hero-infested brain needs.

Any other questions can be directed to our Q&A.

Heroes are merely waves functions waiting to collapse under the weight of any interaction.
When we pour light in every orifice of the world, heroes can't flourish.
Heroes are creatures of shadows, they can only exist in absence and unawareness.

That is the very reason I cannot form heroic images in my mind, no matter the distant past or land they dwell in, my demi-god+ status can shine piercing light and interact with those particles that lay siege in my mind in hopes of terraforming my consciousness into their idealistic parasitic sentimentalist degenerate field of self-perpetuating neuronal arragements.

No, no heroes here.

Continental philosophy tries to climb the insurmountable mountain.
Eternal servitude must be paid to the overlord of our very own fabric, entropy.
Entropy has unfathomable intricacy, the stock physicist cannot extrapolate its bottomless potential.
Myself being marginally superior to these poor imitators of inanimate agency (life, for the uninitiated to the art of knowing almost everything), I can assert with utmost certainty that philosophy has evolved past your bedtime and your trite dichotomy.

And to be perfectly candid, I contain all the moral resolutions within my grasp.
Do not attempt to reach your sweaty palm for my blessing and sageness, it will slip by your dorito-ridden shaky fingers faster than something really fast.

If my life meets its own deadline, the universe will endure its greatest silent despair, my consciousness (a realistic omniscient structure) will be scattered, unfurling my sapience into abstraction, of which I do not anticipate as these lines are being typed into existance.

I think questions are unaesthetic and dumb.
We need affirmative search, not questions and its stupid caveman symbol.

This is the unquestionable movement, to write and think without questions.

I have factual proof to support my claims right here:

1.He tried to kill you?
2.You would be dead under other circumstances.

I hope you see the difference.
The first one is puke inducing, the second is being tickled by the gods.

No one so far has been able to find counter proof, so it's safe to say we don't need questions from now on.

A person in need for guidence for such interactions must have a rather unorthodox storyline.
Unless you tend to be in the spectrum of people that aren't self aware enough to understand their true shortcomings.
That bunch is always fascinating but frustating and not in any acceptable form.

Be a champion of your own self and do tell, what is it with yourself.

I was about to pose a question "why would you take your time post something so readily available on google?"

Ok I'll pose it anyway, posing.
Naturally you can't give any interesting answer to this given by your thread.
So don't bother.

Now one would ask why would I take time and post something like this.
Well, I guess I got my initial answer.
Jk I knew all along, this is text theatricality to entertain myself with a dash of self reference since we're in the Meta mode.

And to be more concrete, metaphysics isn't pseudo-anything, it's fundamental physics.
Everyone has their own metaphysics, on the nature of reality and existance, it impacts your whole life and how you experience and accept reality, so it actually is the most anti-pseudo-anything.

It was never truly alive, poetry is what always was, a dyslexic cancer patient in remission, it is always decaying and immortal.

I think he's dead.

I'll have the one political system that I deem to be the most beneficial to the whole of the community and to my personal convictions and understanding of how the world should and is working.

>>5529546
Sincerity is apathy towards the few sources of unadultered joys.
Yes I'm truthful, I transcend life itself.
>>5529551
We subconsciously accept that mythical creature doesn't exist, we try in our wake to convince that completeness is achievable, it's only a day dream you can only wake out from, not into.

Why stay there? Why only change your mind?
Why not go further? Change your underwear, your personal greeting phrase, your eyebrow thickness.

You should always change, when you get comfy with trans go back and try to change it again.
When you get tired by that try blaming modern society and technology for providing too much freedom and variety to choose from.

Also some trannies look fuckable, so jot that down.

>>5529478
It doesn't matter if I'm geniune.

Being sincere in your honesty is not intellectually aesthetic.
Look at the above statement, what do you see?

I have solved it, I solved life.

I feel great joy constantly, I don't need religion, ideology or anything else.

I am enlightened by my own enlightenment.

>>5020306
>it's only fun for you dude
You got me, although I'm not particularly enjoying yours.
Regardless, love you matt9e

>>5020302
Because you're experiencing cognitive dissonance ;)

>>5020286
You could sum most things in two words, doesn't make it as much fun.

>>5020284
Well, in my defense I'm not sincere :T^) fag suffix gree>text etc
Sorry I shat on your post dude.

Post-modernism in art/whatever is heavily relied on context rather than content.

For example look at this >>5020198
He talks about devolution of art, the matter of the fact is that art is becoming more about the medium and context and not the content itself so much, you could argue that art was always about "context" but it's even more so now.

I think, by definition this "devolution of art" should be and is the naturally expected next step.

Unless you think art is limited to a rectangle piece of cloth nailed to some dismembered dead trees.
They're confusing the technical difficulty with art tiself, art doesn't owe anything to anyone, it doesn't require to spring out from the sweat of grunt work.

I'd like to think the abstraction of human thought, ingenuity and aesthetics can reach further than few brushes.

>>4962375
Do you know what is a system?
Also what's up with the number of tripfags, this is not how I remember /lit/.