/lit/ - Literature

>>11631485
u r le leddit phamus now m8

https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/97vzo0/anon_is_still_in_the_cave/

>>11614018
JAMES JOYCE

>>11610425
goat

>>11579408
espera, who is this?

>>11572568
this whole post is a masterpiece of cringe and adolescence

>>11516465
PREACH MY NIBBA

the strunk style one

but i need help with this too
i think knowing how logic works can help through the cloudiness, and knowing some philosophy/history never hurts

bumporoni

>>11507240
why are they trying to make the guy on the top left "happen" so bad?

>>11507060
couldn't you just google those?

>>11503983
if you're not retarded get the basics down jump into kant and the rest

>>11506987
isn't lsd super low toxic and safe?

>>11506331
with the rise of the internet and young autistic boys given the freedom to use it, an "elite" education is going to mean less and less

>>11504883
corny but true

>>11501617
Chomsky is THAT NIGGA. ok?! so please.... RESPECT HIS NAme if you use it, OK?!

>>11502079
astral weeks is one my favorite albums of all time, but it's belfast music m8

>>11502058
link?

>>11501275
idk but it's pointless to read this masterpiece in spanish... I only say this because Marquez himself says the english translation is just as good if not better and having read it in both, the English functions absolutely perfectly in the rabassa translation

>>11500757
on second thought
>>11500859

>>11500761
ok lit how do i into hegel?

i know what the word zietgiest means, the spirit whateer phenomenology something..

what's the low down
that whole german idealism thing? history concentrating to a point

>>11500644
they knew the most about what they were doing and they did just that, make music. Pop musicians you are used to hearing have a pretty rudimentary ability in a harmonic and linear sense compared to these composers. Because they're artists they also tended to be intellectual and it shows in the depth of their music.

>>11500715
all the essays ive written so far in uni
thank god i am math major and not a dirty humanities major that has to write every fucking day

>>11500695
this

>>11500667
i'm only being half ironic

also I have no idea about marxism that's why i made those threads, so i'd hear both sides. As of right now, I think Marx was a visionary thinker who observed some really obvious things and systematized them in a really beautiful way. like all big world changing ideas it has a lot of passionate supporters and critics. I am just a curious person, i don't know enough about anything to "identify" with it.


I had ideas like this on LSD and the like... the illusion of duality. I think nature "talks" to itself.. I don't think that's TOO nutjobbish is it?

Is this serious academic thinking from that great old tradition of answering the hard problem of consciousness? no it isn't but I don't think all the easy problems have been solved yet either..some of which could perhaps change our thinking drastically, and if it's not materialist than i could be a whole lot saner than the reality.