/lit/ - Literature

>>15282664
That is why I am here.
Check this >>/lit/thread/S15267422#p15268038

>>15282593
>The truth is that there is not truth
Retarded dyke. Give logical arguments with evidence retarded spinster.

>>15282441
Elaborate. Give arguments to the anon fucking dyke.

>>15282303
Explain why he is wrong? Arguments. Non-meme answer fucking dyke

>>15282387
Do not bother with butterdyke. She will never give you a good answer.

>>15277380
Then this is a based thread. We hate you fucking dyke.

>>15277086
>Clearly not true. Who are you trying to kid?
It is more than evident. You barely contribute to discussion. The only thing you post are retarded posts, poor argumented replies, retarded e-hoes, retarded youtube music, bad books and stupid advices. How is that quality?

>>15277036
>It’s never anons fault
>bros before hoes
That sounds based
>Shit thread. Shit board. None of my doing.
Ironic coming from someone who post pure shit. Most of the shit in this board is thanks to you. You want me to refute you again?

>>15276958
>46
>Spinster
>"strong"
Kek indeed, I bet you had not even been in a real fight

>>15276930
If you are indeed a woman you are fucking ugly. You literally could past as man. No wonder you are 46 year old spinster kek.

>>15276607
>You have me confused with someone else. I’m certainly not suicidal
Kek. If I was a 46 year old dyke, a failure in art collage, ugly, a dyke and a ex-mod in 4chan I would be certainly suicidal

>>15276480
>Neither are true, but this proves you’re coping.
Yes, he is right. You are 46 year olds, mediocre job, poor, ugly, ex mod in 4chan, art collage failure(film lmao), spinster, probably has menopause and a dyke.

>>15274961
>There are naturally very aggressive children. We are not a blank slate, genetics predetermine behavior
Do not bother trying to explain that to butterdyke. I already debated this topic and this excrement still thinks nature is benevolent.

>>15275072
>All adjustable, preventable. I’m talking about the big picture.
And yet they still natural butterdyke.

>>15272591
Elaborate. Retard

>>15272729
When did I say that?

>>15272462
Thanks for correcting me fellow /lit/zen.

>>15272430
If does*

>>15272405
To be honest I agree with you. There is no way to measure if a world is good or bad is does not exist.

>>15272306
I agree. Specially this one>>15272105

>>15272126
>>15271939
>tp
>Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
Ironic

>>15272153
Sure. We know butterdyke is still a child and still likes coloring books at the age of 46.

>>15272015
> it’s wrong and imperialistic. It’s for making the world fit into the oligarchs plaything
Elaborate with proper arguments. Why is that wrong butterdyke.

>>15272105
Yes. By definition an existing world is better than a non-existing one. How can you compare something that does not exist buttertard?