[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.12299987 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 1600x1437, 14kdv0i.jpg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12299987

>> No.12266095 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 1600x1437, 1545176144433.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12266095

>> No.12250482 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 1600x1437, 14kdv0i.jpg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12250482

>> No.12236384 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 1600x1437, 14kdv0i.jpg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12236384

Paleoconservative chart

>> No.12214337 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 1600x1437, 14kdv0i.jpg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12214337

>> No.11041894 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 1600x1437, 14kdv0i.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11041894

> In the same chart that you put "Why liberalism failed" you also put "Defense of the Constitution of the United States
> In the same chart that you put books against the French Revolution, you put books supporting the American Revolution
> You put people who literally say NOT to be traditionalist

Is this place so pathetic that those who think they are "traditionalists" are only liberals with years of delay? Did someone really read these books or did they know those authors? God.

Navigation
View posts[-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]