/lit/ - Literature

>>20625344
Iliad
Odyssey
Republic

>>20446588
im just teasing fren. im glad youre giving it another try

does /lit/ listen to music while reading

Honest question. And can anyone prove that?

>In wanting to be emancipated from the Christian state, the Jew is demanding that the Christian state should give up its religious prejudice. Does he, the Jew, give up his religious prejudice? Has he, then, the right to demand that someone else should renounce his religion?

Wait, Marxism intended goal was to overthrow the Christendom and replace all positions of power with Jews?

>>20096147
>nick garr

>>20054737
I see.
>verification not required

>>19993651
>Fimbulwinter
trash. I don't understand how amazon and good reads rating works. The progressive sjw releases get good reviews and good score but then this also got a high score? Surely sjws didn't rate this high, and surely people who read older non pozzed literature didn't give high rating. Who then? the only people I can think who might enjoy this story is the type of people who are mentally challenged and are not capable of reading.
I read like 7% and could not continue, it really is that bad.

new thread created even before old thread reached bump limit,

I know this sounds retarded as shit, but I will get mentally exhausted and struggle to get through even one chapter. The only thing I can read is shit from vidya, 4chan and crunching my uni work.

>>19840503
Where do you get yours

>>19705464
>have mixed blood
>think Nimrod is based and was probably one of the first to ever shill him on /lit/
Am I going to make it bros?

Regarding the meme trilogy, is the logical order to start with Infinite Jest and then choose either Gravity’s Rainbow or Ulysses?

>>19556790
The Idiot
War & Peace
Count of Monte Cristo
Therese Raquin
Day of the Triffids

>>19511275
>>19511509
i voted also

Is there any serious author who analyzes the phenomenon of how liberal capitalist elites are engineering a social justice language (terms such as BIPOC, LGBTBBQ+, "nonwhite") as a means of seeding a dualist notion of race between the global population where "whites" are evil and "nonwhites" are a mass, indistinct group that are grouped together on the basis of not being white?
Then analyzing that the telos of such an operation is dissolving ethnic, biological, and cultural boundaries to create a one-world government of atomized individuals that are easier to control and rule over, because they cannot collectivize based on ethnic in-groups, thus weakening the power of the oligarchy?

basically what I'm saying is has there been any good and honest discussion on the theory of ethno-nationalism?

>>19423808
Forgive my serendipitous prolixity, but art thou endeavouring to ascertain the merits and demerits of our most distinguished scholastic achievements?

Do any of you use reading glasses or magnification? I have never needed anything beyond prescription glasses, but I just got a complete works of Shakespeare. I wanted to find out if it is worth it to have it all bounded in one volume, and after I adjusted to the idea of a book that weighs as much as a brick, I decided it was quite suitable for comfy armchair reading except for one significant detail: the print is quite small. I suspect that most people who buy these are not going to read them, and just desire a magnificent display tome for the shelf. It's the Canterbury Classics edition. Should I get reading glasses (that fit over my glasses) or should I return the book?

There's no proof of hinduism

Physical book with extensive note taking > physical books > ebooks > audio books

>>19011957
>Capitalism is the most evil system ever created. It’s the exact opposite of a free market. It is a total dictatorship of the rich. The rich people are also the ones who are served most by a government. For the most basic reason a government even exists is to enforce property rights.
This is Autocratic Capitalism, the form that succeeded Feudalism. But Capitalism, unlike Feudalism, insisting on education and agency, provides a way out: Labor unions. Unions counterweigh corporations so as to create a dialectic that gradually moves us towards Democratic Capitalism, under which corporations are run like republics, rather than dictatorships. Only thing is, Marxians would call this Socialism.

>>18974361
What Laruelle rejects is the "Principle of Sufficient Philosophy", or the pretense to absolute sufficiency which, itself, is what
murders the flow of Becoming. In brainlet terms; that circularity in philosophy which makes it believe it can speak for anything and everything. This is how world power in general (Laruelle is basically a contemporary Gnostic heretic) operates.

That said, Laruelle is not a philosopher of Becoming.

>epistemological nihilism
Close, but not quite. The World is impenetrable to thought, but thought still speaks of the World and for the World. Laruelle is NOT a "you cannot kno nuffn" type.

Instead of thought spinning its wheels in the epistemological abyss (what you just said), or thought penetrating the World to its core (the Principle of Sufficient Philosophy), thought accesses the world at an angle, it ricochets off the surface of the "Black Universe." It doesn't ACCESS it, but it doesn't NOT access it either.

>>18970523
Based. I have never read a guenonfag post.

What if the demiruge is the good guy and the cosmic good is the bad guy ?