Nietzsche OPPOSED Conservatism, Traditionalism, Reactionism, Nationalism, and Racism

[Anonymous No.22179080]

Just read the Gay Science, section 377. He explicitly names conservatism and people wanting to "go back" so to speak and rejects that. He specifically names German nationalism and racism and rejects it too. Then he proclaims himself and others like him to have too much mixed racial backgrounds to want to identify with nationalism, and calls them "good Europeans" trying to transcend these national identities and races. Yes he also opposes egalitarianism and liberalism (he says so in the same section). But why do so many people think he's trying to go back to the past, or support Nazi shit, if he very clearly and explicitly rejected it? In his letters to his sister he even says he's an anti-anti-Semite.

[Anonymous No.22179087]

>>22179080
um...who cares lol

[Anonymous No.22179089]

>>22179080
Liberals don't read

[Anonymous No.22179103]

>>22179080
If Nietzsche was around today he would be a white supremacist. It’s the logical conclusion of his thought.

[Anonymous No.22179120]

>>22179080
The best way to spite old Nietzsche is warp his philosophy to fit my anti humanist thought. I hate all races and genders.

[Anonymous No.22179124]

>>22179120
based

[Anonymous No.22179179]

>>22179103
He wouldn't.

[Anonymous No.22179193]

>>22179080

NEETzsche OPPOSED not being gay.

[Anonymous No.22179224]

>>22179179
Are any other races capable of fulfilling his ideals? Is greatness really an option for anybody except Europeans?

[Anonymous No.22179230]

>>22179080
>nietzche opposed conventions!!!
Wow just read nietzche for the first time did you

[Anonymous No.22179257]

>>22179080
So he hated everyone except aristocrats that barely existed in his time?

[Anonymous No.22179272]

>>22179257
No, he worshipped the ground jews walked on. Whatever they did, he was always ready to rationalize why it's a good thing when they do it and why chuds are wrong to act the exact same.

[Anonymous No.22179283]

>>22179103
> It’s the logical conclusion of his thought.
It’s the opposite conclusion. It’s group fetishism.

[Anonymous No.22179284]

>>22179224
Yes

[Anonymous No.22179287]

>>22179080
>He explicitly names conservatism and people wanting to "go back" so to speak and rejects that.
So did Hitler. Your brain is tainted with contemporary American politics.

[Anonymous No.22179314]

>>22179080
Even what people think of as "revolutionary" movements always argued for "going back" to the golden age of their choice. Early christianity was this to the reformation, classical antiquity to the enlightenment, and pre-agricultural revolution "primitive communism" for communists. I guess even contemporary wokeness has such a state in the days before european hegemony, before whypipo opened the pandora's box of all the world's evils.

[Anonymous No.22179318]

>>22179283
Being a white supremacist does not mean uncritically lionizing whites, or that all whites are superior by default. But the greatest human specimens are without exception European. This is not group fetishism, it’s a biological fact.

By the way, have you read genealogy of morals? Sections of it read like some white nationalist screed, for example when he argues that the etymological origins of the words ‘good’ and ‘noble’ are derived from words used to describe pale skin and fair hair.

You can be racist without being nationalist. Eugenics would not mean making people more like Africans.

[Anonymous No.22179348]

>>22179318
He's focusing on Europeans because that's the morality-herd he's born into. But he says there are other herds (with their own moralities). What he makes clear is that national divisions among this European morality-herd are bad and should be overcome, along with the European morality, so that what follows are the "good Europeans" of the future. Nowhere does this imply that the people of other morality-herds cannot also overcome their herds: he always assumes anyway that even within the Europe-herd, most people cannot overcome, only a few are able to. "White supremacy" implies every white person can overcome. Nietzsche would reject that completely. Additionally being part of the European morality-herd is a matter of what morality becomes your herd instinct and heritage for you to overcome. By 2023 this has no necessary connection to whiteness. A black person born after generations of ancestors lived in European civilization is as much a "European", herd-morality-wise, as a white person. Likewise a white person somehow raised outside European morality would belong to that different morality-herd if that's how they were raised.

[Anonymous No.22179351]

>>22179318
>But the greatest human specimens are without exception European.
This is just not true.

[Anonymous No.22179352]

>>22179318
> But the greatest human specimens are without exception European.
All of them? Not true.

[Anonymous No.22179375]

>>22179179
of cause he would he would think that a 70iq somali refugee is a monkey

[Anonymous No.22179385]

>>22179103
He would be exactly the same kind of guy today as he was in the 19th century: an insufferable lone wolf faggot who disowns all movements because they're beneath him and he can't get along with anyone. Holds mostly rightwingish opinions though.

[Anonymous No.22179388]

>>22179080
Not only are you retarded, you speak to retards.

[Anonymous No.22179776]

>>22179080
>Just read the Gay Science
Sounds like the perfect book for you LOL!

-Sent from my iphone

[Anonymous No.22179825]

>>22179352
Name an exception.

[Anonymous No.22179981]

>>22179825
me

[Anonymous No.22180000]

>>22179385
>disowns all movements because they're beneath him
this is the correct opinion—any support for any group ought to be tactical and not based on some direction-brained pseudo-morality

[Anonymous No.22180003]

>>22179348
>A black person born after generations of ancestors lived in European civilization is as much a "European", herd-morality-wise, as a white person.
Evidence?

[Anonymous No.22180047]

>>22179080
He also OPPOSED Liberalism, Marxism, and Nu-Atheism.
We all know this, shitheaded cunt.

[Anonymous No.22180084]

>>22179080
What about when he calls his fellow Germans and white men / Europeans modern Hyperboreans who must overcome and dominate?

[Anonymous No.22180092]

>>22179348
>A black person born after generations of ancestors lived in European civilization is as much a "European", herd-morality-wise, as a white person.
Lol, are you fucking retarded? Take a look at violent crime stats in the UK or any other European city, idiot. Why are you even reading Nietzsche when you're this cucked/bluepilled?

Sorry you're not white haha.

[Anonymous No.22180108]

>>22180003
To the contrary, blacks commit more than half of knife crime in London despite being a fraction of the population. It's cultural and genetic differences. Rape stats are about the same. It is mostly black and browns who do all of this, when you break it down statistically. Whites are naturally less likely to commit crime, due to genetics and different cultural values.

The media runs damage control or ignores black/brown crime and attacks white people nonstop, so idiots like OP remain in their lala land cartoon reality where all races are "equal" (does OP know that Nietzsche was an egalitarian too??). If they reported nonwhite crime accurately or started making narratives out of it, every white person would be an ethnonat almost overnight.

[Anonymous No.22180288]

>>22179348
Based Nietzsche reader, wish more people on this board had this type of intelligence

[Anonymous No.22180367]

>>22180108
It's not that races are "equal" it's that INDIVIDUALS matter more than averages based on race. That's Nietzsche's point. Fuck race. Fuck averages too. They don't tell you 100% how a specific person will turn out. There are blacks who are more accomplished than you or the other anon. Therefore, those blacks are potentially superior than you are by a bunch of metrics. And there are whites who are also superior to you. There are both blacks and whites who might be inferior to you. It's an on-individual basis. And Nietzsche cares about individuals who prove themselves capable of being of the higher type. It has nothing to do with race. Most blacks are mediocre. Most whites are mediocre. By all likelihood you and the other anon are mediocre, given your tendency toward the very crap Nietzsche argues against, and if we're going off averages it's likely you two as 4chan anons with typical 4chan views are especially mediocre (i.e. neets with no self-drive for greatness who just blame the world for their own shortcomings).

[Anonymous No.22180408]

>>22179080
>mixed racial backgrounds to want to identify with nationalism
Yeah, back when German and French were considered "races."

[Anonymous No.22180415]

>>22179284
The Japanese aren't breeding and will be cucked into global oblivion by the Chinese within 50 years. Other than that there's no one to take the stage once the Weat is done killing itself.

[Anonymous No.22180425]

>>22180367
>They don't tell you 100% how a specific person will turn out.
No shit sherlock. That doesn't mean you just ignore it like an idiot or blind yourself too it like a child, as you're doing. If you think the average Nordic and the average middle eastern muttman / afro-simian are equal then you're totally delusional. Just look at crime stats or IQ or the types of civilizations they create. Whites build great civilizations that people want to live in, nonwhites can't. Whites are high trust and compassionate, nonwhite societies aren't. The fact that individuals exist doesn't refute the collective. Which one is more important is beside the point.

Generalization is the basis of science, which is what Nietzsche praised. I also see how you start generalizing based off of collectives later on in your shitskinned cope of tardpost, right after saying it doesn't tell us anything.

Admit you're a shitskin, i can tell. You're complaining about mediocrity while defending the philosophy (egalitarianism) that creates it in the first place. White civilization fell into mediocrity (actually it's worse than mediocre now) right after buying into idiotic ideas like the one you're espousing right now. It is incorrect and offensive to pretend that subsaharan or foul muslim halfwits are equal to Germanics. Bringing them in ruins our civilization and is disgraceful.

[Anonymous No.22180428]

>>22179080
He also wants us to form our own values and not just follow his heehee

[Anonymous No.22180453]

>>22180425
The children of your nieces and nephews will be half-Arab, Hans.

[Anonymous No.22180510]

>>22180425
I don't think averages are or have to be equal for my point to be right, and you already agreed with it. So again I'll say, fuck races and fuck averages. Focus on individuals. I just don't give a shit about averages. So what if average whites and average blacks differ those are abstractions. Focus on individuals and only individuals. I'm not going to put a mediocre white individual on a pedestal above a brilliant black individual just because on average, according to you, whites are higher than blacks by your metrics of interest. Every individual is his own. Also I'm not defending egalitarianism. Neither is Nietzsche. YOU are defending racial-egalitarianism though. And that's just a narrower version of the egalitarianism you oppose. You're more egalitarian than me, just focused on race rather than species. Do away with equality. Nobody is equal. As such, focus on the great, but measure them individually. Not by shit like racial averages.
>>22180425
I only know that on average I am more accomplished than the usual 4chan poster. I don't have to prove it to you or anyone. You can assume I'm blacker than outer space for all you want. I shouldn't matter to you. What you should care about is proving your own individual supremacy. That's what I want you to do, and not to me, but to yourself. That's what Nietzsche wants you to do as well. You're not going to do it by sucking your own dick about how white you are though. Go and be a creator and actually accomplish something. Then you'll have the satisfaction you deserve, and not be satisfied in the greater whites who did things and whose coattails you ride for free like a reputation-parasite.

[Anonymous No.22180610]

>>22179080
>But why do so many people think he's trying to go back to the past, or support Nazi shit, if he very clearly and explicitly rejected it?
Because Hitler was a brainlet and quotemined the fuck out of him, only to backpedal later and say Nietzsche was more of an artist than a philosopher.

Nietzsche was an anti-utopist. Any one size fits all philosophy was inherently flawed in his eyes, which is why he refused to be called a utilitarian or a humanist or whatever scientology bollocks one could subscribe to. To say no to the world that surrounds you is folly. You must say, "yes, yes, YES!"

[Anonymous No.22180620]

>>22179385>>22180000
>>22180047

>Holds mostly rightwingish opinions though.
the guy is pure product of atheism. He has a messiah complex like any atheist subhuman. In other word, he is the generic reddit leftist.

[Anonymous No.22180663]

>>22179080
Mutt Pride Worldwide

[Anonymous No.22180687]

4.
Mankind surely does not represent an evolution toward a better or stronger or higher level, as progress is now understood. This “progress” is merely a modern idea, which is to say, a false idea. The European of today, in his essential worth, falls far below the European of the Renaissance; the process of evolution does not necessarily mean elevation, enhancement, strengthening.

True enough, it succeeds in isolated and individual cases in various parts of the earth and under the most widely different cultures, and in these cases a higher type certainly manifests itself; something which, compared to mankind in the mass, appears as a sort of superman. Such happy strokes of high success have always been possible, and will remain possible, perhaps, for all time to come. Even whole races, tribes and nations may occasionally represent such lucky accidents.

8.
It is necessary to say just whom we regard as our antagonists: theologians and all who have any theological blood in their veins—this is our whole philosophy.... One must have faced that menace at close hand, better still, one must have had experience of it directly and almost succumbed to it, to realize that it is not to be taken lightly


60.
Christianity destroyed for us the whole harvest of ancient civilization, and later it also destroyed for us the whole harvest of Mohammedan civilization. The wonderful culture of the Moors in Spain, which was fundamentally nearer to us and appealed more to our senses and tastes than that of Rome and Greece, was trampled down (—I do not say by what sort of feet—) Why? Because it had to thank noble and manly instincts for its origin—because it said yes to life, even to the rare and refined luxuriousness of Moorish life!

[Anonymous No.22180693]

>>22180687
57.
One catches the unholiness of Christian means in flagranti by the simple process of putting the ends sought by Christianity beside the ends sought by the Code of Manu—by putting these enormously antithetical ends under a strong light. The critic of Christianity cannot evade the necessity of making Christianity contemptible.—A book of laws such as the Code of Manu has the same origin as every other good law-book: it epitomizes the experience, the sagacity and the ethical experimentation of long centuries; it brings things to a conclusion; it no longer creates. The prerequisite to a codification of this sort is recognition of the fact that the means which establish the authority of a slowly and painfully attained truth are fundamentally different from those which one would make use of to prove it. A law-book never recites the utility, the grounds, the casuistical antecedents of a law: for if it did so it would lose the imperative tone, the “thou shall,” on which obedience is based. The problem lies exactly here.—At a certain point in the evolution of a people, the class within it of the greatest insight, which is to say, the greatest hindsight and foresight, declares that the series of experiences determining how all shall live—or can live—has come to an end. The object now is to reap as rich and as complete a harvest as possible from the days of experiment and hard experience. In consequence, the thing that is to be avoided above everything is further experimentation—the continuation of the state in which values are fluent, and are tested, chosen and criticized ad infinitum.

[Anonymous No.22180694]

>>22179080
>others like him to have too much mixed racial backgrounds
He really believed the Polish aristocracy blood fairytale.

[Anonymous No.22180695]

>>22180693
Against this a double wall is set up: on the one hand, revelation, which is the assumption that the reasons lying behind the laws are not of human origin, that they were not sought out and found by a slow process and after many errors, but that they are of divine ancestry, and came into being complete, perfect, without a history, as a free gift, a miracle...; and on the other hand, tradition, which is the assumption that the law has stood unchanged from time immemorial, and that it is impious and a crime against one’s forefathers to bring it into question. The authority of the law is thus grounded on the thesis: God gave it, and the fathers lived it.—The higher motive of such procedure lies in the design to distract consciousness, step by step, from its concern with notions of right living (that is to say, those that have been proved to be right by wide and carefully considered experience), so that instinct attains to a perfect automatism—a primary necessity to every sort of mastery, to every sort of perfection in the art of life. To draw up such a law-book as Manu’s means to lay before a people the possibility of future mastery, of attainable perfection—it permits them to aspire to the highest reaches of the art of life. To that end the thing must be made unconscious: that is the aim of every holy lie.—The order of castes, the highest, the dominating law, is merely the ratification of an order of nature, of a natural law of the first rank, over which no arbitrary fiat, no “modern idea,” can exert any influence. In every healthy society there are three physiological types, gravitating toward differentiation but mutually conditioning one another, and each of these has its own hygiene, its own sphere of work, its own special mastery and feeling of perfection. It is not Manu but nature that sets off in one class those who are chiefly intellectual, in another those who are marked by muscular strength and temperament, and in a third those who are distinguished in neither one way or the other, but show only mediocrity—the last-named represents the great majority, and the first two the select. The superior caste—I call it the fewest—has, as the most perfect, the privileges of the few: it stands for happiness, for beauty, for everything good upon earth. Only the most intellectual of men have any right to beauty, to the beautiful; only in them can goodness escape being weakness. Pulchrum est paucorum hominum:[30] goodness is a privilege.

[Anonymous No.22180698]

>>22179080
>I want to be like nietzsche

https://www.bitchute.com/video/naL7urXXZLfl/

[Anonymous No.22180699]

>>22180695
Nothing could be more unbecoming to them than uncouth manners or a pessimistic look, or an eye that sees ugliness—or indignation against the general aspect of things. Indigna tion is the privilege of the Chandala; so is pessimism. “The world is perfect”—so prompts the instinct of the intellectual, the instinct of the man who says yes to life. “Imperfection, whatever is inferior to us, distance, the pathos of distance, even the Chandala themselves are parts of this perfection.” The most intelligent men, like the strongest, find their happiness where others would find only disaster: in the labyrinth, in being hard with themselves and with others, in effort; their delight is in self-mastery; in them asceticism becomes second nature, a necessity, an instinct. They regard a difficult task as a privilege; it is to them a recreation to play with burdens that would crush all others.... Knowledge—a form of asceticism.—They are the most honourable kind of men: but that does not prevent them being the most cheerful and most amiable. They rule, not because they want to, but because they are; they are not at liberty to play second.—The second caste: to this belong the guardians of the law, the keepers of order and security, the more noble warriors, above all, the king as the highest form of warrior, judge and preserver of the law. The second in rank constitute the executive arm of the intellectuals, the next to them in rank, taking from them all that is rough in the business of ruling—their followers, their right hand, their most apt disciples.—In all this, I repeat, there is nothing arbitrary, nothing “made up”; whatever is to the contrary is made up—by it nature is brought to shame.... The order of castes, the order of rank, simply formulates the supreme law of life itself; the separation of the three types is necessary to the maintenance of society, and to the evolution of higher types, and the highest types—the inequality of rights is essential to the existence of any rights at all.—A right is a privilege. Every one enjoys the privileges that accord with his state of existence. Let us not underestimate the privileges of the mediocre.

[Anonymous No.22180703]

>>22180699
Life is always harder as one mounts the heights—the cold increases, responsibility increases. A high civilization is a pyramid: it can stand only on a broad base; its primary prerequisite is a strong and soundly consolidated mediocrity. The handicrafts, commerce, agriculture, science, the greater part of art, in brief, the whole range of occupational activities, are compatible only with mediocre ability and aspiration; such callings would be out of place for exceptional men; the instincts which belong to them stand as much opposed to aristocracy as to anarchism. The fact that a man is publicly useful, that he is a wheel, a function, is evidence of a natural predisposition; it is not society, but the only sort of happiness that the majority are capable of, that makes them intelligent machines. To the mediocre mediocrity is a form of happiness; they have a natural instinct for mastering one thing, for specialization. It would be altogether unworthy of a profound intellect to see anything objectionable in mediocrity in itself. It is, in fact, the first prerequisite to the appearance of the exceptional: it is a necessary condition to a high degree of civilization. When the exceptional man handles the mediocre man with more delicate fingers than he applies to himself or to his equals, this is not merely kindness of heart—it is simply his duty.... Whom do I hate most heartily among the rabbles of today? The rabble of Socialists, the apostles to the Chandala, who undermine the workingman’s instincts, his pleasure, his feeling of contentment with his petty existence—who make him envious and teach him revenge.... Wrong never lies in unequal rights; it lies in the assertion of “equal” rights.... What is bad? But I have already answered: all that proceeds from weakness, from envy, from revenge.—The anarchist and the Christian have the same ancestry....

[Anonymous No.22180704]

i mean, yea he was literally a closeted tranny peddling closeted tranny philosophy

[Anonymous No.22180709]

>>22180003
alexander dumas an his father

[Anonymous No.22180717]

>>22179385
He’s literally me.

[Anonymous No.22180759]

>>22179080
BGE somewhere early he praises conservative-minded people for having the correct impulse of wanting to leap away from modernity, it's just that that impulse would better be used to leap forward than backward.

[Anonymous No.22180800]

>>22180759
If you read him more, he praises everyone he criticizes eventually. It's because he understands that only someone one can somewhat respect is worthy of hate, and as such, hate is also by nature meant to be loving. You should only hate formidable enemies that you can love as well.

[Anonymous No.22180804]

>>22180800
I don't think he ever praises anarchists or St Paul.

[Anonymous No.22180806]

>>22179080
Ignore Nitzsche for a moment. Look at yourselves. So rabid. Debating and imbibing his every word with so much importance. What the fuck does it matter what Nietzsche thought? 90% of what he wrote is lonely drug addled rambling. Nietzsche is dead now. These threads reflect what you are, who you are, more than whatever dumb bullshit Nietzsche wrote over a century ago.
You already know the gist of Nietzsche. You have assimilated enough of his material to motivate yourself to good action. Do you want to live in a dream that Nietzsche created or do you want to live it in reality?

[Anonymous No.22180821]

Anyone who rails against "conservatism" - and likewise, anyone who aspires to "conservatism" - is fucking weaksauce.

[Anonymous No.22180912]

>>22179080
>b-but you have to agree with everything!
You can call bullshit on him at any time, like with anybody else.

[Anonymous No.22180919]

>>22180000
>>n-nooo you have to give your life for the side so i can go to heaven nooooo!

[Anonymous No.22181080]

There are plenty of subhuman whites. Everything is a product of culture. The whites priestly class cultivated the higher virtues and that diffused among the population. Doesn’t mean anything objectively, meaning as the other anon said, a negro could cultivate himself in like fashion. That’s all it comes down to.

[Anonymous No.22181126]

>>22180804
and yet he was himself a Pauline anarchist...

[Anonymous No.22181185]

>>22181080
>The whites priestly class cultivated the higher virtues
like what ? THe spirituality has been controlled by jews for over 2000 years and the materiality for 250 years since the rise of secular entanglement.\
And behind closed doors, whites are just coomers, like anybody else.

[Anonymous No.22182078]

>>22179080
uhm based? imagine thinking conservatives are not the worst enemy of both progressives and traditionalists. they are basically the bad guys of history

[Anonymous No.22183361]

>>22181185
Nice tardpost

[Anonymous No.22183370]

>>22180453
No they won't you stupid shitskin. You're coping, i know you're jealous of my family's golden blonde hair and blue/grey eyes. Meanwhile your poo ancestors all ran away to white countries because they're weaklings who can't create civilizations worth living in.

[Anonymous No.22183378]

>>22180510
>literal nigger halfwit can't distinguish between individual and collective
I know you're black lmfao, so in both cases (i.e., individual and collective) you are JUSTed. Seems like collective is more often than not an accurate predictor of the individual.

[Anonymous No.22183389]

>>22179080
I just reread it, and had no idea how you got that from 377. Just realized I read 337. Should I uninstall and reroll? Thanks.

[Anonymous No.22183404]

>>22179385
>who disowns all movements because they're beneath him
When you self-actualize, this is the inevitable outcome. You stop identifying with groups or identities, because they are nothing but copes for people who cannot find themselves for themselves. As evidence, look at this little bitchfit you're throwing
>an insufferable lone wolf faggot
all because he didn't give a shit to like what you like and thought for himself.

[Anonymous No.22183864]

>>22179080
>He thinks Nietzsche means what he says
Op is an intellectual midget.

[Anonymous No.22184110]

>>22183404
>When you self-actualize, this is the inevitable outcome. You stop identifying with groups or identities, because they are nothing but copes for people who cannot find themselves for themselves.
The thing is you can find yourself all you want but if you want ti change anything materially, i.e. actualize a possible reality, you need a group. Individualistic thinking is either laziness or cowardice.

[Anonymous No.22184958]

>>22180425
More like you snow niggers are the great destroyer by introducing the most unnatural and dysgenic system in the history of mankind: industrialization. A cretinized faggot like you wouldn't have even survived childbirth without modern medical intervention. Infant mortality played an important role in genetic winnowing, so it's to be expected every civilization would decline thanks to you retarded Judaized myopic Snow Nigger retards. Human beings were fine before industrialization was introduced, stripping them of their autonomy and leading to unnatural ways of life, and most lived in small homogeneous villages relatively isolated from one another. It was one you Faustian snow nigger shitheads that went against the natural order of things, and you self-victimizing quasi-Jews can't die soon enough. Thanks for showing the world that by worshiping a Jew for 1000+ years, you spiritually become identical to them.
Why should I care about the skin tone of the pre-industrial Indonesian deep sea divers, like the Bajau? The only reason I care now is after snow niggers spread their filth modernity, their coral reef are now dying in massive number and trawling is leading to overfishing. Snow nigger filth like you lack LATERAL THINKING, unable to make basic connections, as you sip your shit coffee from plantations from Costa Rica that have led to immense deforestation.
Also, your women are ugly whores, and I have never found them attractive even when they hit on me. They have mannish jaws and have an insatiable sex drive reminiscent of negroes.
Anyways, consider suicide. You won't ever have an ethnostate for your shitty hypocritical race.
The only thing snow nigs are good at is creating UNPRECEDENTED problems from their juvenile Faustian drive.
Honestly, you deserve to be disemboweled and slowly tortured in Minecraft, including your whole shit family. I support the Abduls giving you hell, and respect them more than YOU.

[Anonymous No.22184968]

>>22184958
Is this the Iranian schizo who constantly talks about how he's some subset of Iranian that is the true Iranians?

[Anonymous No.22185001]

>>22180510
The reality is there was no major problem during pre-industrial times: People lived in small homogeneous villages in connection with the land. There was no need to constantly compare or think about other races while you lived in your local village. It was Jews and Snow Niggers, which are effectively one and the same thing, who ruined this with their diabolical industrialization, which invariably spread. It opposes the primordial state of man.
This is why snowniggers, like that retard you're debating, always critique or judge things according to modernized values. They are not truly autonomous beings, completely brainwashed by the artificial anti-nature system they're born in. Modernity was undeniably a mistake, and using modernized values such as "being good at technological/scientific growth" as a metric to judge civilizational capacity is in the blood of the SnowNigger.
The Jew-SnowNigger abomination can't die soon enough, a cursed race that sacrificed the natural world in its desire to conquer the stars. The Earth will have its revenge on these insufferable trash race.

[Anonymous No.22185012]

>>22179103
He would unironically support BLM and mask mandates. I like Nietzsche, but let's not fool ourselves. He would support globohomo.