/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15495397]

Any books that can stop me from being racist? I don't want to be racist?

[Anonymous No.15495412]

>>15495397

[Anonymous No.15495415]

Taking the emphatic approach is probably the best place to start. Just read some of these to try to see the perspective of black people better

[Anonymous No.15495420]

it's fine anon, just don't be a hateful racist, don't fixate and dwell upon it, just accept the ugly truth of the matter and move on

[Anonymous No.15495432]

First of all a firm grounding in the science.
We are all a related species. With outward physical differences Formed for vast time apart only.

So-thought “great cultures” and “primitive” ones are a result of geography and resources, not genetics.

[Anonymous No.15495440]

>>15495397
No books. Only love can drive out hate

[Anonymous No.15495441]

>>15495415
>emphatic
meant empathetic

[Anonymous No.15495447]

>>15495412
kek

[Anonymous No.15495454]

Intelligent racism
>It is obvious from the statistics and historical evidence that whites exceed blacks in almost all departments. Therefore, since I value excellence in these departments, I believe whites are superior to blacks.
Unintelligent racism
>I judge individuals by their skin colour. I do not know what averages or bimodal distributions are. If one category exceeds another category on average, that means all the members from the first category are worse than all the members from the second category. I also believe that if a wall is big, the bricks that make it up must be big. I refuse to engage with other cultures and prefer mine for no reason other than genetic predisposition. My views on politics are lacking in nuance and I will support any policy that I perceive as going against the Other. My entire worldview is formed on group-identification; and I believe there is no strong philosophical argument against inbreeding.
>etc.

[Anonymous No.15495456]

>>15495432
Many West Africans have sloped foreheads and lack a well-developed prefrontal cortex.
>>15495397
I don't see the issue with racism towards blacks. Racism towards blacks is something all Caucasoids understood through honest observation. In fact, I think mass extermination or deportation of blacks is morally just, theologically and morally speaking. I am not being "ironic" either.

[Anonymous No.15495467]

>>15495456
>morally just, theologically and morally speaking
just, theologically and morally speaking*

[Anonymous No.15495468]

>>15495456
>Many West Africans have sloped foreheads and lack a well-developed prefrontal cortex
when will u learn that phrenology is not fucking credible

[Anonymous No.15495470]

>>15495456
And yet the horse and donkey can only produce a sterile creature.
Humans are a a varied species. Get over it Klaus

[Anonymous No.15495472]

>>15495397
Get a 130iq Nigerian GF

[Anonymous No.15495479]

>>15495454
Good point
>>15495456
Elaborate on that mr. le utilitarian

[Anonymous No.15495485]

>>15495468
Only at a certain point it loses credibility. When making very general observations on macro-racial differences of humans, it still has some validity.
>>15495470
West Africans are a separate subspecies. Pretty much every race is on a genetic continuum except for blacks. Check image. Zoom out of a PCA plot and this is what you get.

[Anonymous No.15495489]

>>15495485
No, fool. Same species.

[Anonymous No.15495492]

>>15495479
I'm not a utilitarian. What do you want me to further elaborate on? Also, I have views that would make /pol/ seethe too.

[Anonymous No.15495503]

>>15495489
There are many subspecies of crows with less Fst and genetic distance than humans, and they are classed as a separate subspecies. These crows look identical too. Different subspecies can still procreate.

[Anonymous No.15495506]

how can you be racist if there's just one race: the hyuman race?

[Anonymous No.15495510]

>>15495492
How is mass extermination morally just and according to which religion is it theologically just