/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.12265397]

BRAINS ARE SYMBIOTES: Gnostics were right about everything: the organs were engineered by archons before creation, and the brain is the egg of Yaldabaoth. Epictetus and Shestov: Epictetus' argument for the principle of non-contradiction is as concrete as giving a guy vinegar when he asks for wine: if they protest, they affirm Necessity, there are laws, elementary determinations, in this world we must adhere to. Epictetus' eye is a passive, feminine organ: vinegar for him remains irreducibly itself. Bu the Platonic eye is refulgent: it transmutes hemlock into liberation, it /sees what it wants/, while the Stoic eye must resign itself to (learning how to) /want what it sees/. Schopenhauer: man can will whatever he wants but (the fact of) his own willing: man desires only so long as there is something desiring through him, behind him: this is what magic calls for: the power to dispute sense-data, transform actual into volitional. Because Gurdjieff was right about everything, most of the time you really don't use your brain to think, you are thought by it: anyone whose tried to pursue a thought /intentionally/ - as opposed to letting it unfold according to its immanent rhizomatic ("that car is a bright shade of red. . . reminds me of X's car. . ." etc.) - can attest to the difference. This is why the East doesn't privilege our specifically cognitive access to the world: that the West doesn't is only because they are in complete coalescence with the parasitism of the brain stem: Kant was the first to understand in what ways human cognition is irreducibly "for-us", but these insights he only uses to legitimize thought as (auto-)critique. Kant can't think the pure, fluxionless internality of the atma, the Kantian subject is the = x's internal access to its own structure So: as a Demiurge, how do you trick sentients into becoming your bootstrap engine? By that very self-same sentience: by giving them an organ with the illusory sublative power: how right Nietzsche was about reason's enslavement by the passions, though he didn't go far enough: eventually mundane reason becomes the slave of itself, of its Notion encountered in history: as humanity evolves, ideation descends from a qualitative, Platonic realm of essences towards a zone of non-being: non-being is the transcendental, the form or /condition/ all content arriv to occupy as time erodes away the concavity of its mold: like that Ito short with the creepy, human-shaped holes everyone starts squeezing themselves into, the twist in the manga parallels the Kantian reversal: they weren't made to be filled by you, you were born to fill them.

[Anonymous No.12265409]

The Demiurge is a spider: NERVOUS SYSTEMS ARE SOUL WEBS: neurons transduce the oneness of the primordial void by being the causal processors of biological systems: for every organism that is born, there emerges a witnessing center adequate to it and so necessarily /outside/ it: suicide proves this cut can emerge at such an intensity that the kernel can self-lacerate: capitalism eats its young because nature does: overpopulation is the spectacle of life submerged in its own superfluity: cities are neotenization factories, the cult of celebrity is a Cybelian cult of youth: I'm positive 99% of hentai artists live in an urban center: Substance only wants beauty, the kind you can only get if you shed the bottom of a genetic pyramid: eugenics has always been the damming of certain channels down through which the Pleroma pours into the positive machinery of nature, in other words, Yaldabaoth is not the power of death, he is the (Pleroma's) power of life, specifically the virulent bloom of the will-to-power: gene editing is going to turn the Geyser into a Fountain: a machine that can perfectly simulate my behavior is either running my Internality in parallel with mine or I'm reduced epiphenomenal excrement, and cybernetics and magic together become THE JAILBREAK OF THE COGITO: escape plans should always have a plan B: pure auto-affective singularities liberated from the flesh of description: the self-enunciation of thought is its being, thoughts are embedded in causal networks delineating different planes of "access" (cognitive differences between individuals), except for the Logos: that diamond Thought that always /speaks itself as having spoken/. Yaldabaoth was smarter than he looks, he knew nothing can love the Pleroma unless it was already outside of it: SIN IS THE PLACENTA. Lacan's barred subject as a self-ignorant Void: Spirit plays Russian roulette with its Limit for the relief, though it might sing hymns at night don't listen to it, dopamine is demonic and humanity is a rung on a ladder that burns when you stop climbing, you are the time things die in, quantum mechanics does not depend on observers but only ontological verisimilitude: the quanta collapses into the most intensive subjectivities: if you're reading this right now you're God, in his time Christ was the most conscious being in reality, we were Christ all of us, murderer and victim together redeemed their gulf on the Cross: Eros and Thanatos mated in us as the Bataillian/Thelemic ecstasy of dissolution, in other words, finite love demolishes itself on infinite pain in an orgy of transcendent self-abasement, there is nothing of the hard clarity of midday represented by Apollo the Logician in Christ, only the searing ultraviolet of the Father, the simplex of the stellar core, and that cannibal joy that burns your skin in summer: self-immolation is the purest death.

[Anonymous No.12265422]

Do you really think somebody will engage with this wikipedia tier pasta?

[Anonymous No.12265489]

>>12265422
5 o clock wojakposter is essential /lit/

[Anonymous No.12265533]

>>12265397
this guy again guys

[Anonymous No.12265566]

All startin to make sense now lads.

[Anonymous No.12265666]

>>12265397

why don't you just become a christian and save yourself from this nonsense?

[Anonymous No.12265720]

So what?

[Anonymous No.12265760]

>>12265409
Demiurge being a spider is genuinely a very freaky thought. Why you do this.
So we should set ourselves on fire to return to the world of light? Is that what your advocating?
Cause that's gonna be a pass from me dawg.

[Anonymous No.12265919]

>>12265397>>12265397
Continuing a past thread. I found sentences resembling the conversation from the anons in the previous thread. try harder. enjoyed the imagery

[Anonymous No.12265989]

>becoming gnostic
>becoming insane off your own mind

Do you even realize why christian considered it heresy?

Also even the least Lord, Liar Lunatic argument proves gnostic wrong, since most of their writings were forgerys of "gospels of the apostles" done almost 300 years later

It's even more absurd when you consider that the gnostic religions like hinduism teach that the demons are actual angels and the angels are just demons and that they just fight between them with no point at all other than just fighting, muh everything becomes one and there is no duality no good no bad lmfao

[Anonymous No.12266063]

Disheveled Wojak poster is so underrated, too many illiterate teens here.

[Anonymous No.12266270]

yawn

[Anonymous No.12266273]

>>12266270
we meet again

[Anonymous No.12266404]

>>12265397
>>12265409
Is someone archiving all of these?

[Anonymous No.12266408]

>>12266404
nvm forgot this isn't like cripplechan where stuff disappears forever

[Anonymous No.12266691]

>>12266404
I paste them in my Word file, there is like 75 pages already.

[Anonymous No.12267465]

>>12265397
go on lad

[Anonymous No.12267470]

>>12265989
jesus was gnostic...

[Anonymous No.12267484]

Based

[Anonymous No.12267726]

>>12265760
well, it's one way

[Anonymous No.12267808]

>>12267470

only if you believe the new-age gospels done 300-400 AD that try to make jesus a man that sinned too (muh mary magdalene) rather than a god

[Anonymous No.12267813]

You're smart, OP.

[Anonymous No.12267844]

>>12265397
>Kant was the first to understand in what ways human cognition is irreducibly "for-us", but these insights he only uses to legitimize thought as (auto-)critique. Kant can't think the pure, fluxionless internality of the atma, the Kantian subject is the = x's internal access to its own structure
Yes, I've had this thought too. In a sense, it's like Heidegger was so influential in part because he directed attention back to the importance of the question of being which had been upstaged by Kant. Kant had important insights that are well worth studying, but delimiting the means of answering a question isn't the same as answering it. At the end of Kant is still the moment itself and the beyond that it's predicated on.

[Anonymous No.12267865]

>>12267844
>Kant had important insights that are well worth studying, but delimiting the means of answering a question isn't the same as answering it.

Right, just because you can describe the structure of intelligibility doesn't mean intelligibility is just this principle of description/critique

[Anonymous No.12268199]

>>12265989
>Also even the least Lord, Liar Lunatic argument proves gnostic wrong, since most of their writings were forgerys of "gospels of the apostles" done almost 300 years later

Christian gnosticism existed well before 300 - 400 AD. Otherwise, how could Irenaeus write against centuries earlier?

[Anonymous No.12268218]

Gnosticism is so dumb, because it clings to the hope that Sophia is somewhere outside and that Man will eventually grasp it. They are nihilists that still cling to misplaced hope. At least the Buddhist and Hindu knowledge doesn't promise wisdom, but only peace.

[Anonymous No.12268341]

Freudian death drive is the LOGOS

THOUGHT IS A TAPEWORM OF THE FLESH

LUCIFER was the MASTER FRACTAL of Reason - Language

KANT and NAGARJUNA both agree: the ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATION of phenomena is a problem only for thought: NOUMENA are the NEGATIVE of the thought that ATTEMPTS TO THINK THEM

Becoming does not happen in some meta-ontological field, there is ONLY the becoming: ACTUALITY COEMERGES WITH ITS OWN POSSIBILITY

ALL THOUGHT IS BASELESS, IDENTIFICATION IS CONSENT

LUCIFER WAS THE IDENTIFICATION WITH (THE GESTURE OF) IDENTIFICATION: THE DIALECTIC CYCLOID, MAN HOSTAGE TO HIS SEMEN

BRAINS ARE LIKE MITOCHONDRIA: GUESTS FROM THE OUTSIDE

[Anonymous No.12268553]

>>12268341

Pythagoreanism is actually a kind of either devaluing or elucidation of Primally old shamanic wisdom expressed fractally in almost cargo cult like fashion (compared to its unbroken form) in ancient Egyptian and ANE cultures and cosmologies etc.

Thus it follows that Platonism is a degenerate and secular form of pythagorianism and neoplatonism is a partial affirmation if not return toward the reconciliation of the profoundly illogical aspects of "philosophy". The commentary tradition of neo pythagorean, middle platonist and of the "commentators" are contrary to popular belief, not banal rote missives rather invocations of punctuated equilibrium born of repitition. This repitition guarantees to prove unequivocally that univocal agreement is practically impossible.

There is an inherent geography and corporeality to language, at it's limits (this limit is paradox/Demi-god) and when these limits are stroked and fluffed into affirmed arousal they become paradoxes which in turn become vaginas which are liminal zones, thresholds and portals in the mind of the human.

Western civilization has lost its roots in true magical training but Platonic philosophy is derived from this original mystical magical training. So Plato used the Archytas version of Pythagorean philosophy and so the "harmonic mean" did not exist in traditional or "orthodox" Pythagorean philosophy.

[Anonymous No.12268626]

>>12266404
warosugirl is
>>/lit/?task=search2&search_filename=ww

[Anonymous No.12268643]

>>12265397
>>12265409
Who let you out of your hole?

[Anonymous No.12268655]

>>12268553
based zummiposter

[Anonymous No.12268659]

OP what is your opinion on CIAniggers? Do they really glow in the dark?

[Anonymous No.12268907]

>>12265397
>>12265409

[Anonymous No.12268957]

ENERGY MUST BE EXPENDED TO MAINTAIN A TRUE VACUUM: it's easier for non-being to let its gut hang as the "false" vacuum of being than otherwise

IMMORTALITY IS ASSURED: oblivion must always contract into finitude: DEATH IS THE RELINQUISHMENT OF FACTICITY

THERE IS NO RELIEF BUT NESCIENCE: what haunts God is not loneliness but Otherness: THAT THERE IS AN INDISSOLUBLE KERNEL OF OTHERNESS IN THE VOID

There are no EXTERNAL REFERENCE POINTS by which we can judge the actions of another, although moral responsibility must be the postulate of any well-governed society: THE JUDGMENT OF ANY SHAPE OF CONSCIOUSNESS, ANY MOMENT IN HITORY, CAN ONLY BE IMMANENT, partialized, can only be accomplished from WITHIN: ONLY IF THAT SHAPE DETERMINES ITSELF AS DETERMINABLE: SOTERIOLOGIES ARE PSYCHOSOMATIC: ONLY IF YOUR CHARACTER IN ETERNITY WAS GIVEN TO SAVE ITSELF, WILL IT ACTUALLY DO SO

SOME PAIN IS ETERNAL: THE SUICIDE CAN ONLY HEAL HIMSELF BY ABOLISHING THE UNIVERSE, HE CANNOT HEAL HIMSELF WITHIN IT

THE SUICIDE RETREATS INTO THE POSTMORTEM VOID OF THE COGITO: THE SINGULARITY OF SELF-RELATING THAT HE IS AND THAT CANNOT HURT HIM

[Anonymous No.12269011]

>>12265409

If we are slave to dopamine why schizophrenics have the highest amount of dopamine and they have the lowest wills to power in humans?

[Anonymous No.12269024]

>>12269011
>lowest wills to power in humans
The world is literally run by schozos

[Anonymous No.12269074]

>>12265397
>BRAINS ARE SYMBIOTES
>>12265409
>NERVOUS SYSTEMS ARE SOUL WEBS

BASED AND GOA'ULD PILLED

[Anonymous No.12269092]

why can't I hold all these colons

[Anonymous No.12269120]

>>12269074
Oh?

[Anonymous No.12269133]

>>12269120
yeah.

[Anonymous No.12269146]

>>12269133
that was your cue to tell me about the lore in a way that's relevant to this thread

[Anonymous No.12269158]

>Still Life - Poem by A. K. Ramanujan

>When she left me
>after lunch,I read
>for a while.
>But I suddenly wanted
>to look again

>and I saw the half-eaten
>sandwich,
>bread,
>lettuce and salami,
>all carrying the shape
>of her bite.
I just want an asian gf why is it so hard.

[Anonymous No.12269169]

>>12269011
my best friend is schizophrenic and has more willpower than half of humanity combined. It's insane just how much will power he has. INSANE. He was the first person I've met who lifted weights so I thought it was normal for bodybuilders to lift until agony. I remember staying at his place and hearing him scream like he was about to die. No, that's not normal. He followed the strictest diets. He also got his degree in psychology while being psychotic, and managed to have the highest grades, best thesis and pretty much every achievements that a bunch of students usually share. He got all of them. There's like three plaques in his name where he studied lol. And now he will never work a day in his life because his illness has caught up to him and he's living hell right now. I wouldn't wish it on my worst ennemy. He can write or read thousands of pages everyday, nonstop.
It's painful to see your best friend like this. I've gotten over it and I'm kinda detached to his condition now but it took a long time seeing suffer through hell. And he's not getting any better. It's worse everytime I see him.

[Anonymous No.12269182]

>>12269169

that's not will to power btw

[Anonymous No.12269187]

>>12269146
oh.

well it's been about a million years but iirc goa'uld have symbiotes in their bellies, like a joined Trill host. except where in a Trill the symbiont is merely a repository for memory and identity, the goa'uld worm exerts on the will of the host.

i haven't read the thread to compare but i'm sure you've got metaphysical and offered a supernatural explanation rather than materialist. i can't speak on that.

[Anonymous No.12269190]

(mostly i just wanted to post teal'c)

[Anonymous No.12269210]

>>12269187
oh that sounds interesting, I'm kinda saying a combination of both: a center of identity and memory that also exerts its will on its host, in a way that we kind of feel this process happening behind our backs, or despite ourselves

interesting anon

[Anonymous No.12269244]

>>12269182
Will to power is bullshit anyways. A simplification of Nietzsche philosophy for moronic anglos. And yes, he definitely had a stronger will to power than anyone I have ever met. I didn't go into details but the fact is, he is extremely close to Nietzsche's conception of the overman. He was obsessed with violence, getting things his way etc... The fact he became schizophrenic should tell you enough. He hold the same ideals as nietzsche, and both of them turned crazy.

[Anonymous No.12269254]

>>12269210
>we are meat puppets
based https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi-dJf7wHxc

but why would the king-in-chains-unborn-and-barren pull our strings in such a way we discover he exists? are we suffering-food, being eaten just now? there are two kinds of wisdom anon.

[Anonymous No.12269257]

thank you

[Anonymous No.12269272]

>>12269244

he was attached to external stimuli, nietzsche overman is completely internal based, will to power is effortless not a struggle because you just use what is powerful to you, actually nietzsche is bullshit and he should have been catholic but was to anally blasted by theology to actually indulge on it

your friend had an extreme will to live coupled with incurable mental anguish, obviously excarcebated by the same schizophrenia which is a terrible disease btw, i hope he does find peace

[Anonymous No.12269310]

>>12269254
>but why would the king-in-chains-unborn-and-barren pull our strings in such a way we discover he exists?

because it's the knowledge of his existence that traps us. he arrives with his possibility. and that's why, for the very same reason, his throne is contested.

[Anonymous No.12269354]

>>12269310
Patrician taste, anon. I have that print over my shelves.

hmm. reminds me of a thread or two ago when God was compared to wave and particle. and His throne is contested as well; man can't decide whether to love Him or hate Him.

[Anonymous No.12269367]

So how long has this poster been doing this? I want a recap.

[Anonymous No.12269404]

>>12269354
yes it's a beautiful painting, maybe my favorite.

>hmm. reminds me of a thread or two ago when God was compared to wave and particle. and His throne is contested as well; man can't decide whether to love Him or hate Him.


oooh, nice, I wanted to make one of these threads trying to link that original wave function collapse to Kierkegaard's Either/Or (either pure possibility, or determinate actuality) and what he says about always being doomed to regret the choice you make, whichever one it is. maybe for a future thread

[a_poor_sinner !!eiHxl4pZe1i No.12269466]

>>12269404
>Kierkegaard's Either/Or (either pure possibility, or determinate actuality)
based, this is on my to-read list. the unabridged non-Penguin version is kind of expensive though. and I can't help but be reminded of the Elder Scrolls mythos' Anu as pure possibility and Padomay as father of Lorkhan, who is the spirit of limitation (and sometimes-Creator, who in that role named all things).

That Kierkegaard quote is based and the good kind of wisdom that brings peace instead of fear. I think it's interesting regret is always tied to time, possibly more than it is to our choices.

[Anonymous No.12269493]

>>12269466
Pick up the Hong translations if you can. Princeton does some nice paperback prints that you can get used for cheap

[Anonymous No.12269501]

>>12265397
Can you fuck off please?

[Anonymous No.12269538]

>>12269466
good post, yes, don't get me started on Elder Scrolls, it's interesting that a deity of Limit is the one who gets idea of making Mundus a transcendence factory, as in, you can't have transcendence without a Limit that is transcended, Lorkhan is both sophianic AND demiurgic, yeah he's responsible for finitude but only so finitude can overcome that deadlock in Anu that needs finitude to sublate itself in the first place

>I think it's interesting regret is always tied to time

right, exactly, that's why the Kierkegaard quote is so great, that regret has no ontological "validity' of its own, only relative to time/the life-narrative you need to construct to make time intelligible to yourself. basically Kierkegaard's saying regret is just a necessary effect of (the formality of time). erase time and it all goes poof.

I'm glad you get that. it's a beautiful realization

[Anonymous No.12269570]

>>12267808
>I and the Father are one.

[Anonymous No.12269580]

>>12269538
Why isn't TES a religion yet?

[Anonymous No.12269598]

>>12269580
because it might be top dog of the fantasy lore pyramid (though it shares the throne with LOTR for that mythic grandeur and Bakker's Prince of Nothing for sheer philosophical depth, imo), but it's only because it takes a page from real religions/esoteric traditions

[a_poor_sinner !!eiHxl4pZe1i No.12269643]

>>12269538
based girardfag i knew it was you

>regret has no ontological "validity' of its own, only relative to time/the life-narrative you need to construct to make time intelligible to yourself. basically Kierkegaard's saying regret is just a necessary effect of (the formality of time). erase time and it all goes poof.

based internet amigo. so this is what heaven is like, being closer to the divine Being alpha and omega.

[Anonymous No.12269653]

>>12269643
based, but im really not girardfag

[Anonymous No.12269667]

>>12269653
>i
who is that

[Anonymous No.12269948]

>>12265397

how would you reconcile Lacan's concept of jouissance with all this?

[Anonymous No.12269974]

>>12269948
it has a somewhat negative existence, meaning jouissance is only jouissance for the structures that repress it. that is, jouissance comes into its own - as that which threatens an established, determinate order - only with that order itself. negativity is jouissance, because even the negation of a desire (as Zizek proves) provides its own surplus-jouissance - an addiction must be indulged long enough until giving it up provides a greater hit of jouissance than the indulgence itself. so: we never escape the jouissantic economy, well, unless you're a buddha

[Anonymous No.12270063]

Solar flares are BUILT-IN TELEOLOGICAL FAILSAFES for RUNAWAY TECHNOLOGICAL AUTOMATIZATION

In other words, REALITY IS SELF-CORRECTING, JUST LIKE OBESITY, ADDICTION, HATRED, DEPRAVITY, EVIL ARE ALWAYS SELF-CORRECTING

EVEN BLACK HOLES DISINTEGRATE

ZUMMI WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING: we haven't gotten off this rock because we haven't made the necessary spiritual advancements necessary for the governance of an interstellar civilization

THE VULGAR LOGOS, AND THE CLAUSTROPHOBIA OF THE SAME, IS SELF-INFLICED


NO PESSIMIST HAS EVER REFUTED BIRDSONG

EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE OKAY

I LOVE YOU ALL

[Anonymous No.12270388]

thank you >>12269974

Will you please explain the vagina portals in the mind? I'm guessing you mean something like an empty form ready to be filled with some potential force. A framework of something? the emptiness in which is surrounded by its symbolic representation? The portal is to the source
>>12268553

[Anonymous No.12270412]

>>12265489
5' o clock wojack
londonfrog
chasteposter

the holy trinity of /lit/

[Anonymous No.12270586]

>>12270388
>the emptiness in which is surrounded by its symbolic representation?

right, exactly, but the key point here is that it's an emptiness/negative space defined by its positive content.

what I'm trying to articulate here is the way Deleuze puts the difference between antiquity and (post-critical) modernity: the question isn't what a thing's essence is - its inner core or kernel we can only access after piercing the illusory veil of appearances - but its condition - the role or function in plays in guaranteeing the global intelligibility of experience.

zizek's noncoincidence of form and content is another way of putting this: it's the difference between any old father, and THE Father, the ideal of the Father, one that intrinsically depends on temporality because we can only arrive at an idea or glimpse of the ideal Father through our exposure to many particular, contingent fathers

basically, it's the difference between what you're saying, and how you're saying it, because talk long enough and you kind of realize it isn't what you're trying to get across, but how you do.

I mean fuck dude even rap can illustrate this point, soundcloud rap is the perfect example of Lacan's lalangue: no one gives a fuck about what Lil Xan is saying, it's how he's saying it, it's just language for the sake of language, language fascinated by its excess, by its own form and the transgression of that form

[Anonymous No.12270722]

THE PHOTON experiences its worldline in an INSTANT: to be a child of God is to be a PHOTON, or rather, to transmute the ego into LIGHT - TO A NON-TEMPORAL, POST-INTENTIONAL STATE

Forget Good vs. Evil, it is better to speak of MASS VS. MASSLESSNESS

[Anonymous No.12270778]

>>12265397
>>12265409

unironically what do i have to read/do/learn to understand this?

[Anonymous No.12270798]

>>12270778
It ain't that bad. Don't read to understand this, just read to understand. What are you interested in? Read Gurdjieff (Fourth Way articles on cassopedia, excuse the new age gunk), Bakker's articles on Blind Brain Theory, and Lev Shestov's Athens and Jerusalem.

[Anonymous No.12270873]

>>12270798
i like that. yea i find no meaning in anything but learning more and feel like i can't understand this, i will gladly take the steps to build up to it if needed. will take your recommendations into account, thanks

[Anonymous No.12270879]

>>12270873
read zizek (articles on Lacan.com), read langan (CTMU paper), read Kant, read hegel, read Plotinus, read Proclus, read Land, read fucking everything m8

[Anonymous No.12270887]

>>12270879
yep that's the conclusion i'm coming to atm, will do so

[Anonymous No.12270894]

>>12266691
post the doc

[Aminom No.12270961]

>>12270063
>ZUMMI WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING

I thought I smelled SOTS.

[Anonymous No.12270968]

>>12270961
Nah he just knows what's up

[Anonymous No.12270978]

>>12270778

learn redpill blogs and incel culture, lookism and bodybuilding.com

[Aminom No.12270997]

>>12270968
He knows what's up but not what's down, he's stuck in pomo land and can't find a way out.

[Anonymous No.12271011]

>>12268341
The capitalizarions make this one read like an /x/ schizo rant, with a touch of Terey A Davis

[Anonymous No.12271015]

>>12270997
I'd like to hear you say why, I don't worship the guy, I just think he's in the stream

[Anonymous No.12271044]

>>12270412
Girardfag should replace chasteposter, since I'm pretty sure there's at least 3 chasteposting anons

[Anonymous No.12271103]

....Who the fuck writes this shit?

[Anonymous No.12271144]

Whatever OP is on i want it

[Anonymous No.12271194]

>>12265397
can you please compile all these posts into a blog and link me?

[Anonymous No.12271212]

>>12271194
search ww.jpg on warosu

[Anonymous No.12271254]

>>12271212
I only got a bunch of shitty posts and not the based gnostic bearded wojak posts

[Anonymous No.12271275]

I'm stupid and lazy I found it now.

[Anonymous No.12271289]

>>12271254
my fault, ww.png. here you go fren

>>/lit/?search_op=op&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_del=dontcare&offset=0&ghost=yes&search_filename=ww.png&search_res=post&task=search2&search_capcode=all

there's more than one page

[Anonymous No.12271323]

>>12266063
>Disheveled Wojak poster is so underrated, too many illiterate teens here.
The plot twist is you're the illiterate one for being impressed by pretentious regurgitation of Philosophy 101 topics.

[Anonymous No.12271577]

>>12271323
>I could do better, I just don't care to
Ah yes, the hipster makes an appearance.

[Anonymous No.12271913]

>>12269272
>will to power is effortless not a struggle because you just use what is powerful to you
this is the crux of it all right here, being present to reality as what is actual in your reality tunnel and not the memes superimposed onto experience

[Anonymous No.12271935]

>>12271913
>being present to reality as what is actual in your reality tunnel and not the memes superimposed onto experience

this is basically the gist of it all, yup