/lit/ - Literature

File: 22 KB, 279x200, IMG_3917.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

forgotten philosophers Anonymous Fri Aug 4 09:54:48 2017 No.9848124 [Reply] [Original]

>forehead
>bergson

who are some other people that deserve a memeing?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 09:55:50 2017 No.9848127 File: 58 KB, 636x674, pepner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:06:12 2017 No.9848160 >>9848124 >bergson I read his on laughter once and jesus christ that was retarded

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:11:33 2017 No.9848171 Junger

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:13:14 2017 No.9848176 - Lamarck - Herbert Spencer - Alex de Tocqueville - Adam Smith's other works

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:17:37 2017 No.9848181 >>9848124 Reading creative evolution atm and loving it. Useful for thinking about artificial intelligence and consciousness, and is helpful for understanding heidegger a bit more too Deleuze is hardly forgotten

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:21:24 2017 No.9848191 Bolanzo Croce Comte

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:21:25 2017 No.9848192 Habermas Luhmann Diogenes

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:26:54 2017 No.9848205 >>9848176 no >>9848181 yeah i just put deleuze cuz he likes bergson >>9848191 >>9848192 these r good

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:32:00 2017 No.9848216 A.C. Ewing José Ortega y Gasset Carl Schmitt (although there is an increasein popularity lately)

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:38:06 2017 No.9848233 >>9848171 >has more new edition published now than the last 30 years >forgotten

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:38:29 2017 No.9848235 File: 103 KB, 960x705, rebel-diogenes_o_3386117.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9848205

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:43:19 2017 No.9848250 Max Scheler. A non-Husserlian phenomenologist who savagedly btfo'd Heidegger and everyone pretended like it didn't happen (especially Heidegger).

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:45:32 2017 No.9848260 Benjamin

Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:47:51 2017 No.9848276

>>9848250
>Max Scheler
>everyone pretended like it didn't happen (especially Heidegger).

>>After [Scheler's] death in 1928, Martin Heidegger affirmed, with Ortega y Gasset, that all philosophers of the century were indebted to Scheler and praised him as "the strongest philosophical force in modern Germany, nay, in contemporary Europe and in contemporary philosophy as such."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Scheler

???

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:51:18 2017 No.9848286 File: 47 KB, 250x250, 50620934.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9848260 cant think of any

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 10:55:21 2017 No.9848308 Can't think of any forgotten, but my favourites right now would be Peter Rollins and Albert Camus.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 11:15:28 2017 No.9848381 Bachelard Ficino Averroes and most Persian philosophers Herder Henry more and the Cambridge platonists

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:03:51 2017 No.9848544 >>9848191 >Bolanzo

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:08:30 2017 No.9848555 >>9848544 I meant Bolzano. Just goes to show how forgotten he is (and how dumb I am).

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:11:05 2017 No.9848561 >>9848381 what about averroes is worth reading

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:18:33 2017 No.9848577 Vico

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:34:32 2017 No.9848609 >>9848276 Yeah, Heidegger pretended like Scheler didn't destroy his philosophy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:35:34 2017 No.9848612 Fichte. Way better than Hegel.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 12:37:38 2017 No.9848618 Peterson

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:07:45 2017 No.9849560 >>9848609 how did he destroy it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:12:14 2017 No.9849581 Lev Shestov

Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:16:22 2017 No.9849594

>>9848160
It was a good text if you didn't take it too seriously. Pretty much like most of Bergson's work, it can be useful if you only take some things from it, as Deleuze did. Deleuze himself admits that Bergson was considered dubious and new age (the latter mostly due to his following).

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:20:43 2017 No.9849611 >>9848160 It's a simple book but it explains a lot about its subject matter. What was your problem with it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:21:07 2017 No.9849612 >>9849560 Scheler provided a really strong critique of Heidegger and Heidegger was like "Yeah, well you forgot Being lmao" and moved on while ironically giving him very high praise. Scheler didn't like Heidegger, Nietzsche even less so.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:35:27 2017 No.9849667 >>9848612 how so

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:45:10 2017 No.9849694 >>9849612 yeah, but can you give some deets on the critique

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 17:58:29 2017 No.9849748 >>9848160 doesn't he make a reference to black face? clowns and black face as a certain modality of laughter.. or something ... >>9848181 how so? I think the language is similar but surely Heidegger and Bergson are never brought together?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 18:57:45 2017 No.9850004 >>9848192 Habermas and Diogenes aren't obscure

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 19:20:43 2017 No.9850117 File: 93 KB, 537x640, boehme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Jakob Böhme

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 19:50:42 2017 No.9850204 Castoriadis

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 19:56:09 2017 No.9850231 >>9848233 noone cares about him

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 4 21:41:46 2017 No.9850627 >>9850231 Ur mum cares about him xdd

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]