[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 65 KB, 480x605, IMG_20170726_161036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9808401 No.9808401[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/26/britain-artwork-banksy-art-girl-with-balloon

Damn fucking straight!

>> No.9808405

>>9808401
You got to be some fucking retard to judge popular taste on literally the most common denominator

>> No.9808408

How did the dyslexic anarchist end up in a+e?

He chopped his dick off trying to fuck the cistern

>> No.9808457

>>9808401
>Real art is
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.9808461

>>9808457
t. librel who thinks all is relative

white art is REAL art. You're not a real man

>> No.9808462

>>9808401
'nice shirt'

>> No.9808468

Banksy's trash. A Bristolian, ex-public schoolboy that idiots think speak for the common man.

>> No.9808480

>>9808401
How does ambiguity make art good?

>> No.9808496

>>9808468
The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about

>> No.9808497

>>9808468
What he dies is really cool though

>> No.9808752

>>9808401
>Real art is....

Stopped reading right there.

>> No.9808776

>>9808752

Found the pseud

>> No.9808903

>>9808401

Put the Vatican in charge of the art galleries.

Best art is divinely inspired.

>> No.9808920

>>9808776
Define art you niggerfaggot. You'll just end up assigning unmeasurable qualities to works you enjoy with unfalsifiable reasonings.

>> No.9808930
File: 75 KB, 500x492, scoobs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9808930

>>9808920
>unmeasurable qualities
>unfalsifiable reasonings.

Well look who we have here

>> No.9808944

>>9808930
No arguments presented in this post

>> No.9808945

>>9808920
Art are objects, both intellectual and physical, which are created as a means towards conveying a shared intentionallity of the creators phenomenological horizon. The degree towards which this horizon is conveyed is the degree to which the work is a success

>> No.9808952

>>9808401
His art is just so unbelievably on the nose, like that terrible hitler painting.

>> No.9808957
File: 167 KB, 866x838, 1464727325768.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9808957

>>9808401
>the absolute state of british art

>> No.9808960

There is not a single convincing argument for the objectivity of aesthetic values.

>> No.9808968

>>9808903
I genuinely love that inferno statue that makes the pope look like a satanist leader

>> No.9808991

I just think Banksy's message is really ignorant and naive. It's like he's defacing innocent brick walls with obnoxious political cartoons.

Wow, money really DOES run everything, Banksy! Very clever!

>> No.9808999

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Jones_(journalist)

>Him: University of Cambridge Graduate

>You: North East South West Alabama drop out

Um, like, no sweetie, you're too dumb to debate him!

>> No.9809004

>>9808991
>I just think Vonnegut's message is really ignorant and naive. It's like he's defacing innocent paper with obnoxious political rambling.

>Wow, war really IS bad, Kurt! Very clever!
This is what you sound like

>> No.9809022

>>9809004
Yes I know that Vonnegut is trash.

>> No.9809023

>>9809004
What a terrible post.

>> No.9809049

>>9808401
It's a decently good article

>> No.9809051

>>9808945
the 18th century called, they want their ideas back

>> No.9809057
File: 121 KB, 515x513, St Paul.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9809057

>>9809051
You need to go deeper

>> No.9809059

I can't define real art but Bansky fans are all fedoralods, so I hate them.

>> No.9809080

>Real art is ambiguous and difficult
Is Michelangelo's David or The Creation of Adam ambiguous and difficult? How about Romeo and Juliet? The idea that real art has to be fucking incomprehensible to the ordinary person is entirely made up by smug academics of the 20th century.

>> No.9809090

>>9808457
>thinks all discussion about what constitutes true art is meaningless
some of us disagree

>> No.9809123

>>9809080
>Is Michelangelo's David
Actually, yes.
It completely went in the face of the contemporary attitude of the time of depicting David.
What was the norm was depicting him after the battle. Michelangelo depicts him holding the stone, and showing his ambiguous, almost ambivalent expression to the situation, contrasted with the rage-like depiction of the hand.
The Adam is historically self-explanatory, although God is depicted with other human figures, and the cape formed as a brain.
As for Romeo and Juliet, did you ever read it?

>> No.9809143

>>9809123
>What was the norm was depicting him after the battle. Michelangelo depicts him holding the stone, and showing his ambiguous, almost ambivalent expression to the situation, contrasted with the rage-like depiction of the hand.
Wow, that wasn't very complicated. I bet anyone could understand that.

>As for Romeo and Juliet, did you ever read it?
It's a simple love story for simple people. It's like When Harry Met Sally but 400 years ago.

>> No.9809151

>>9809143
Yeah, anyone could understand anything when you tell them.
>It's a simple love story for simple people.
So you just watched the movie or something?

>> No.9809160

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIyQJryBz5k
the only relevant critique of banksy

>> No.9809179

>>9809160
Zizek probably said something good at some point

>> No.9809189

>>9808401
No it's proof that mainstream British artists are shit