[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 37 KB, 242x320, IMG_8930.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9768306 No.9768306 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.9768319

>>9768306
vulgate, if you dont know latin douay-rheims, its a literal translation of vulgate

modern ones dont translate directly what the author has written, but they change phrases so it turns out shit + they simplify it into retardedness

>> No.9768321

The Norton Critical

>> No.9768397

NSRV is the standard scholarly version i believe. Depends on your purposes and what you mean by a 'study bible'. Something like the bible is hard to recommend a version because it's going to depend on whether you are interested in certain denominations ect

>> No.9768405

>>9768319
>modern ones dont translate directly what the author has written, but they change phrases so it turns out shit + they simplify it into retardedness
This but unironically.

Reminder the Catholic Church got so fed up with bad translation philosophy found in other commercial bibles they sponsored a new translation but found out this new translation was still appalling they rewrote major portions of just so it was acceptable.

>> No.9768416

>>9768306

Your pic is the best one.

KJV translation, so you get the poetry, and because the explanatory notes are very helpful in pointing out mistranslations and stuff you get accuracy as well.

>> No.9768426

>>9768397
>NSRV is the standard scholarly version i believe
From what I've seen this is only true in mainline (read: dying) protestant seminaries and repeated by liberal theologians trying to deflect from its criticism.

>> No.9768504

New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha

>> No.9769137
File: 12 KB, 265x401, The-Didache-Bible-with-Commentaries-Based-on-the-Catechism-of-the-Catholic-Church.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9769137