[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 50 KB, 303x379, Derrida_main.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9722324 No.9722324 [Reply] [Original]

How do I into Derrida?

>> No.9722333 [DELETED] 

How I started was with reading Lacan's seminar on The Purloined Letter and then Derrida's commentary on that seminar.

>> No.9722337 [DELETED] 

Deconstruction isn't a philosophy but a methodology.

>> No.9722342

>>9722337
How do I into the methodology?

>> No.9722343

How I started was by reading Lacan's seminar on The Purloined Letter and then Derrida's commentary on that seminar.

>> No.9722348

Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Saussure, Heidegger, Lacan

>>9722342
Deconstruction is not a method and cannot be turned into one.

>> No.9722352

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvAwoUvXNzU

>> No.9722501

>>9722352
He's great, I wish there were lectures on Lacan and Deleuze by him as well.

>> No.9722512

>>9722501
he's fat and ugly and a liberal shit

>> No.9722657

>>9722348
this

>> No.9722688

>>9722512
sounds like he's, dare I say it, /ourguy/.

>> No.9722859

>>9722324

Jonathan Culler's "Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature," and "On Deconstruction" will give you a good starting point.

>> No.9722916

>>9722512
>liberal

>> No.9723013

start with structure sign and play, then read voice and phenomena

>> No.9724496

drugs

>> No.9724504

>>9722348
and Wittgenstein (PI)

>> No.9724508

well, read (at least some) heidegger and definitely husserl, some levi-strauss and saussure, then read structure sign and play, white mythology, and the introduction to of grammatology (seriously, spivak explains most of it in the intro)

>> No.9724596

>>9724508
it's too bad spivak doesn't know what she's talking about and is a shitty translator.

>> No.9724620

>>9724504
Derrida apparently wasn't familiar with Wittgenstein. Reading Wittgenstein may muddy the waters a bit in comparison to reading just what 'influenced' Derrida, or rather what he responded to.

>> No.9724775

>>9722324
If you get into him, you're not getting into him at all.

>> No.9724835
File: 195 KB, 1008x771, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9724835

Pic related.

I'm starting Of Grammatology and it opens with a quote from a text abbreviated as "EP". I've been searching the pdf for an explanation of what EP stands for and it doesn't appear to be in the version I have and I can't find the source anywhere.

Or is this some dumb Derrida joke and there really is no "(EP, p. 87)" and he's just fucking with me?

I might be losing my mind. Please help.

>> No.9724852

>>9724835
It refers to L'Écriture et la psychologie des peuples

>> No.9724879
File: 374 KB, 920x1200, death_35.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9724879

>>9724852
Thank you!