[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 30 KB, 344x588, IMG_3774.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9668131 No.9668131[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

is that what you do now, mods?
take threads down because you run out of arguments?

pathetic

>> No.9668138

>>9668131
i'd get over it. m8. we all know she doesn't read and is a pseud attention whore and the only people who say otherwise believe that's the best women can do and women shouldn't have to read books before blah blah blahing about them because they're special retards who don't need standards for themselves. delete your own thread if you can, you're just feeding the pseud attention whore, and our ex-gfs who read don't need to be grouped in with her ad campaign.
lol shit, i just realised she's an unselfpublished tao.

>> No.9668145

>>9668138
what are you even talking about?

>> No.9668161

>>9668145
go read a book.

>> No.9668179

>>9668161
you're still butthurt about that jewtube attentionwhore, aren't you?

>> No.9668215

>>9668179
i'm saying you're feeding her attention with this thread. attention she doesn't deserve compared to other attentionwhores who read. you're as pseud as her, since you can't understand 4chan posts, like her. reading a book might help that.

>> No.9668230

>>9668215
i'm not even talking about a thread that had anything to do with the ugly whore... stop assuming

>> No.9668235

>>9668230
they're the only threads i noticed disappearing. why the sudden bump when we were saging nicely ?

>> No.9668240

>>9668235
there was a thread about philosophy that got deleted for no reason.

>> No.9668242

>>9668131
I don't even care about the shitposting but there was an interesting thread about one anon discussing homosexuality in the work of ome author and it got deleted as well.

>> No.9668249

>>9668240
got a thread number?
>>9668242
you too.

>> No.9668255

>>9668242
moda really lost it. they keep deleting threads randomly. not our fault if some weirdos keep shitting the board up with their slut raid... they shouldn't delete threads just because.

>> No.9668267

>>9668249
sadly no. i also couldn't find it in the archive. might dig deeper and report back.