/lit/ - Literature

File: 185 KB, 1344x1344, as33.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Jun 16 21:16:19 2017 No.9646349 [DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

Is "On Women" the only work shitposters can use to justify mocking him?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 21:26:22 2017 No.9646393 No. Only the meme picture with the quote. Not the book.

Anonymous Fri Jun 16 21:31:19 2017 No.9646416

On Women is actually really insightful, and I say that as a woman. Polemical critiques like that are infinitely better aligned with real feminism, philosophically speaking, than any saccharine, condescending, paternalistic "hurr how dare you speak ill of m'lady!" male feminism bullshit.

There's infinitely more respect in Schopenhauer's dislike of women than in any male feminist's a priori worship of women. Disliking someone implies recognition that the same standards apply to them, i.e., that they are a human, being with the same opportunities and responsibilities as anyone else.

What's even creepier than the kneejerk "M'LADY, PLEASE ALLOW ME TO SAY THAT I HATED 'WILL AND REPRESENTATION' IN YOUR HONOR!!! LOOK AT ME, M'LADY, ARE YOU LOOKING? I'LL HATE KANT AS WELL IF YOU BUT ORDER ME TO, M'LADY!" is how they immediately turn it into a sex thing, by saying Schopenhauer was a bitter virgin. That's the most complex Freudian move I've ever seen. Male feminists misapprehend women as some kind of sexual Rhadamanthus, eternally judging who gets to enter into the sacred vagina and who doesn't, and then their pathetic strategy for being judged worthy is to obsequiously offer themselves as SURROGATE judges of OTHER, even less worthy men. Even if their initial mistake were correct, they'd still be pathetic cringing plebs.

Male feminists are the least fuckable human beings on the entire planet, evenly tied with insecure alpha male wannabes who can't shut up about how they hate feminism.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 21:57:48 2017 No.9646534 His ontology is a little pantsu-on-head >the world is individual representation >we are all representing the same things but idk lol

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 21:59:55 2017 No.9646543 >>9646416 I wish more girls were like you.

Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:02:51 2017 No.9646554

>>9646416
Schopenhauer could well be a pillar of any "real" feminism, devoid of rent-seeking and victim-complex bullshit... along with the likes of Esther Vilar and other similarly caustic authors.

Now: you detest supplicant feministos and alpha-wannabes... how about "natural" alpha men? Do they tickle your fancy?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:09:54 2017 No.9646582 >>9646534 The world as representation is a tool to learn about the world as will. The world as representation must eventually be discarded.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:11:23 2017 No.9646591 File: 3.01 MB, 294x238, lmfsbroflmao.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9646554 >Now: you detest supplicant feministos and alpha-wannabes... how about "natural" alpha men? Do they tickle your fancy?

Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:19:02 2017 No.9646621

>>9646591
In case she (you?) really was a girl I was curious to see if the handsome caveman was of interest to her... as it's excedeengly are to see a woman agreeable to Schopo's ideas. Since she mentioned her disdain for two types of men, I was curious to find out more.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:19:25 2017 No.9646625 >>9646582 So how is it different than Kant?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:22:58 2017 No.9646635 >>9646625 I don't understand your question. Could you rephrase it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:33:34 2017 No.9646668 It's the essay that is unfortunately the most relevant to the interests of many people. >>9646416 Even if you're not a girl, I find this to be true.

Anonymous Fri Jun 16 22:52:53 2017 No.9646727

>>9646635
Well Schopenhauer thought that part of his brilliant elaboration on Kantian ontology was explaining the phenomenonal world as entirely subjective individual experience. I may be wrong because all my library had about Schopenhauer was a secondary work written by an opinionated normie dickhead

Anonymous Sat Jun 17 00:02:45 2017 No.9646917

>>9646416
This is correct.
Pretending women are divine creatures who have no flaws and can't be criticized is pathetic bullshit but just blindly hating on women is pathetic bullshit too. I think both are linked in that they both stem from a lack of understanding of women and the former chooses to blindly worship while the latter chooses to blindly attack.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 17 00:05:58 2017 No.9646927 >>9646416 Was this not patently obvious to everyone already? Seriously /lit/? How old are you all?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 17 00:09:14 2017 No.9646933 >>9646416 >as a women Guaranteed replies.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 17 00:15:57 2017 No.9646948 >>9646349 As someone who loves women he's pretty accurate.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]