[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 122 KB, 750x750, nBOQn65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9520538 No.9520538 [Reply] [Original]

Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, __________ ?

>> No.9520544

foucault

>> No.9520553

schopenhauer

>> No.9520557

>>9520538
Peterson

>> No.9520559

Hegel or Kierkegaaard

>> No.9520560

>>9520538
my diary desu

>> No.9520563

>>9520557
that's more retarded than foucault

>> No.9520568

heidegger

>> No.9520570

HEIDEGGER

>> No.9520573

>>9520563
foucault's whole oeuvre is like an extended commentary on geneology of morals

>> No.9520574

Adorno

>> No.9520580
File: 55 KB, 248x248, waaahbuhbrokinheartid.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9520580

>>9520544

, check them

>> No.9520582

>>9520538
Puberty.

>> No.9520583

kripke

>> No.9520584

sean goonan

>> No.9520588

>>9520582
Hehe

>> No.9520594

According to Bertrand Russell:

>This revolt (against traditional systems in thought, in politics, and in economics) had two very different forms, one romantic, the other rationalistic. The romantic revolt passes from Byron, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche to Mussolini and Hitler; the rationalistic revolt begins with the French philosophers of the Revolution, passes on, somewhat softened, to the philosophical radicals in England, then acquires a deeper form in Marx and issues in Soviet Russia.

>> No.9520598

>>9520573
that's even more retarded as a defense. at least point to the nietzsche where he paraphrases don quixote

>> No.9520611

>>9520583
this

>> No.9520649

>>9520538
...and a WICKED sense of humor

>> No.9520670

Freud, even if he was wrong. Fits right in.

>> No.9521933

>>9520574
Check. And it should be obvious.

>> No.9521946

>>9520538
Land

>> No.9521951

>>9520594
>The romantic revolt passes from Byron, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche to Mussolini and Hitler
extreme cringe
fuck this guy

>> No.9522180
File: 11 KB, 240x240, JC Schmidt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9522180

...both spooked.

Stirner, Kierkegaard and Hegel's where it's at.

>> No.9522183

>>9522180
woke af

>> No.9522186

>>9522180
Hegel is the spookiest spook who ever spooked

>> No.9522217

_________ .

>> No.9522223

>>9522180
This guy right here

>> No.9522671

>>9520538
me

>if they are this and i do this and then they do this then they are this

page 1222 of my notes for my philosophical magnum opus

>> No.9522978

Bataille

>> No.9523699

>>9520538
Icycalm

Search your feelings. You will know it to be true.

>> No.9523731

>>9522180
>Kierkegaard and Hegel
Masterful posting

>> No.9523770

>>9522186
it's like >>9522180 never read the book

>> No.9524060
File: 77 KB, 500x406, tumblr_m1qc96kBy11qcu0j0o1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9524060

>>9522186
>>9523770
>Implying you can get flowers without soil.
If you're going to be like that then Schopenhauer and Nietzsche shouldn't be put together either.

>> No.9524078

>>9520538
More like...

Lao Tzu
Schopenhauer
Stirner
Heidegger
Foucault
Zizek

>> No.9524136
File: 34 KB, 604x175, Hezi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9524136

>>9524078
>Laozi
>But no Zhuangzi
Do you even dispute?