Meta thread: 1 per board according to Hiro

[Anonymous No.9464215]

>right wing lit threads get banned
>Marxism threads reach bump limit
Why?

[Anonymous No.9464264]

>mods banning a Waugh poster
>mods banning a Carlyle poster
>mods banning a Burke poster
>mods banning a Nabokov poster
>ever
So you read shit right wingers and can't scare the mods into repealing your ban on the basis of literature? Engels is probably beyond your comprehension, and he's far easier than Marx, so I don't know how you're going to understand Brecht threads or any of the revolutionary literary threads like Futurism, and that means even the fascists are out for you. Maybe if you didn't avatarfag as a fat faced faggot and read a good book or twelve, the mods wouldn't be trying and failing to get you off this site as you have failed to get your non-utile spirit off this earth? God and man and mods included ought to judge you and find you sharply lacking. Politely saged.

[Anonymous No.9464267]

It's cool to be a Marxist now

[Anonymous No.9464273]

>>9464215
Spencer isn't right wing, though.

[Anonymous No.9464274]

>>9464215
>he thinks 'Marxism threads' aren't also created by right-wing frog faggots

Talk literature instead of your shitty politics, fat loser

[Anonymous No.9464297]

>>9464273
What is he then?

[Anonymous No.9464302]

>>9464215
>DUDE HITLER WAS EVIL LMAO
>haha mao doesnt kill >100 million people xD

[Anonymous No.9464322]

>>9464297
A white/Euro identitarian first and foremost, he doesn't align with a lot of what is typical right wing stuff.
Watch this interview, he says some good things about Bernie Sanders and shit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlOv3BXSyJM

[Anonymous No.9464328]

>>9464264
This honestly, the quality of Catholic posting is quite high, and never banned. "Right wing" threads are not only transparent trolling attempts, but never advance the discussion. I cant wait for the day that someone brings up a new contemporary under the radar novel that dissects modern conservatism or makes a really great discussion of the Alt-Right as a phenomenon.

As they are, someone posts

>Right wing /lit/
or
>Why does /lit/ not like right wing /lit/

And then somebody mentions Evola, Junger, Mishima, and Spengler all totally inappropriate to what the OP really wants, and then the infographics and pictures of niggers looking dumb starts.

As always, if you want really good Nationalist /lit/, read the novels about the glories of the country in question.

If you are an Englishman, and want far right reading, read churchill. There is your glorious history. If you are American, read Shelby Foote. If you are German, read Niebelgunlied.

[Anonymous No.9464333]

>>9464302
Said no one ever.

[Anonymous No.9464338]

>>9464328
>If you are an Englishman, and want far right reading, read churchill. There is your glorious history.

[Anonymous No.9464343]

>>9464322
Thanks. I don't think I'm going to like his views but I'm interested in finding out what they are.

[Anonymous No.9464344]

>>9464338
God Save King Harry, may he deliver us from sodomites and the moor

[Anonymous No.9464360]

right wing lit is just the history of reaction and cuckoldry, why waste your time on that when you could be doing literally anything else

[Anonymous No.9464366]

>>9464343
national bolshevism is the future

[Anonymous No.9464367]

>>9464328
You've never been in a Mishima thread in your life and not all those authors are Catholic, which means you're not even a good faggot because Waugh and Mishima would really teach you a lot about yourself and how you're awful. You're trying to lie about right wing threads because you're a failure of a reader on both the left and right. Try to parade as a leftist if you want attention.

>advising reading Churchill
>to someone who mentioned Carlyle
If you're going to re-write history for idiots like you, Churchill is the superior. He's excellent at getting the subnormal to believe things he didn't even think sound. If you have any refinement at all, any sense of true heroes and glory, then read Carlyle. Obviously the latter is advice you cannot take, but other anons might benefit from it.

kek though. Being pathetic enough to lie about the content of Mishima threads, because lifting triggers you that hard. You must be more manlet than him.

[Anonymous No.9464368]

>>9464215
>>Marxism threads reach bump limit

thats not true, my marxist thread got deleted

>>9464273
this

[Anonymous No.9464385]

Calling a socialist right wing because he's a nationalist is like calling a cat a duck because it likes swimming.

[Anonymous No.9464389]

>>9464367
>You've never been in a Mishima thread in your life
Oh my god you faggots are awful. It is soooo difficult to engage in /lit/, you truly have a monopoly on it. When I say Mishima has no bearing on the right, I am talking about his devotion to personal aesthetic in his work, that right wing idiots perceive as ideology.

>advising reading Churchill
>to someone who mentioned Carlyle
>If you're going to re-write history for idiots like you, Churchill is the superior. He's excellent at getting the subnormal to believe things he didn't even think sound. If you have any refinement at all, any sense of true heroes and glory, then read Carlyle. Obviously the latter is advice you cannot take, but other anons might benefit from it.

Oh my god, you dont even understand that I am agreeing with him. The "far right" threads are asking for specific works on far right topics to advance their own interests, when they should be looking at beloved national literature. Your shitposting is trash too.

>not all those authors are Catholic
I didnt say that at all. Your reading comprehension is trash.

[Anonymous No.9464411]

>>9464389
>if I lie about threads hundreds of anons post in nobody will notice
everybody knows that mishima threads are for faggotry and lifting. if you don't know that from reading his books alone, you're subnormal. if you could not gather that from any given mishima thread you are below retarded.

>Oh my god
God has not graced you with the talent or industry to read a 4chan thread comprehensively, let alone a book, but with all the lexical mannerisms of basic bitch who is surprised her tits don't work on the internet. Post em sugartits, there's no way you came this far as a man or troll with this little talent in any department.

[Anonymous No.9464428]

>>9464215
>imagine being this mentally ill

>>/lit/?task=search2&ghost=yes&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=IMG_0002.jpg&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

[Anonymous No.9464437]

>>9464215
Because the world is a giant conspiracy against white men, the white race, and kekistan.

Is there anything else i can get you today, sir?

Good.

That will be $0.02, deposited straight into my account.

[Anonymous No.9464506]

>>9464368
Was yours the Zizek one yesterday that got pruned? I liked that thread.

[Anonymous No.9464558]

>>9464215
fuck off racist idiot