[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 38 KB, 450x360, 1491096530225.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448139 No.9448139[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Who is the smartest person?

>> No.9448142

>>9448139
me, obviously

–everyone

>> No.9448144

How does this thread relate to literature?

>> No.9448154

Me. Pleasemeech.

>> No.9448156

>>9448142
not me
-the smart one

>> No.9448157

Sherlock Holmes

>> No.9448161

>>9448156
i know i'm not smart

– guy who actually thinks he's smart but knows that if he said he was smart everyone would know he's not smart so he'll just keep on saying he isn't

>> No.9448179

>>9448139
my diary desu

>> No.9448181

>>9448139
Gauss and Euler

>> No.9448187

>>9448144
It does not, it should get deleted shortly.

>> No.9448189

Noam Chomsky, not even joking. It's precisely the WAY he thinks that qualifies him not what or how much he knows.

>> No.9448197

>>9448139
one thing I know, is that I know nothing

>> No.9448202

>>9448142
This, its him

>> No.9448205

Noam Chomsky

>> No.9448206

>>9448139
Trump. 45-dimension chess.

>> No.9448207
File: 104 KB, 898x893, tw7r69L0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448207

There can only be one

>> No.9448217

>>9448139
not a woman and certainly not an attractive young woman.

Anyone want to debate on whether men are the intellectually superior sex.

>> No.9448223
File: 50 KB, 280x350, yudkowsky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448223

>>9448207
you think you

>> No.9448224

Jordan B Peterson


Without a doubt

>> No.9448234

>>9448139
>>9448142
It's too vague of a question to warrant a specific answer.
The closest one could come, would be someone who understands that people are smart with limitations of their knowledge (including themselves) while also having supremacy in more fields than anyone else. In any event, a significant portion of this assessment would still be subjectively and arbitrarily judged because omnipotent knowledge is just not possible for us.

>> No.9448240

Ben Shapiro or perhaps Thomas Sowell are candidates

>Sam Harris is autistic meaning he is subhuman and thus not a candidate for smartest man alive

Noam Chomsky was either never as smart as we thought or has gone senile in his old age
[See quotes on Trump]

"These are just samples of the real lives of Trump supporters, who are led to believe that Trump will do something to remedy their plight, though the merest look at his fiscal and other proposals demonstrates the opposite -- posing a task for activists who hope to fend off the worst and to advance desperately needed changes."

>> No.9448249
File: 31 KB, 403x403, genie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448249

>> No.9448256

Joe Rogan

>> No.9448262

>>9448139
>tfw will never suck Rose's cock
The thought honestly haunts me every wretched day given to me.

>> No.9448266

Socrates
>>9448256
actually nevermind-

>> No.9448275

>>9448139
The Meta-Ego.

>> No.9448280

>>9448189
You have it backwards. Its what he knows that makes him smart not the way he thinks. If he had an abstract thought in that genius head of his he'd immediately realize that he's biggest conspiracy theorist the world has ever seen

>> No.9448291

>>9448139
The one who always loses. Derr.

>> No.9448302

>>9448240
Uhhh, Chomsky has Trump pegged. I don't know what you are talking about.

>> No.9448308

>>9448280
Explain.

>> No.9448312

John von Neumann.

>> No.9448319

>>9448302
his libtard opposition to trump is the downfall of what could've been a great genius

>> No.9448325
File: 73 KB, 201x226, jester archetype.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448325

Sam Hyde
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt19Vp9uBiQ

>> No.9448341
File: 103 KB, 639x782, IMG_5147.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448341

>> No.9448348

>>9448341
ahhh the old "smart but lazy" excuse eh, has it really come to this?

>> No.9448356

Adam Lanza was the one true god of intellect

>>boys who see porn more likely to harass girls study finds

"Eric didn't play doom because he wanted to kill people: Eric wanted to kill people because
he played Doom".
People who are likely to sexually harass are going to seek pornography. Instead of treating
poornography as an external force which floats around trying to corrupt people from some
allegedly-ideal set of behavior, why not ask where a desire for pornography comes from?
Pornography exists as a coping mechanism for an artificial scarcity of sex. And where does
sexual harassment come from? Sexual harassment is a retaliation against, once again, an
artificial scarcity of sex.
Stigmatizing sex and then being aghast that there are consequences is a classic case of
having one's cake and wanting to eat it, too.

>> No.9448370

>>9448139
Milton is right up there at the top. We have (incomplete but still substantial) records of what he read and it is astounding, basically everything important written in Greek and Latin, including a solid grasp of the debates the Patristic fathers hashed out as well as medieval Scholastic thought. As the English Commonwealth's propaganda minister, he won fame and universal recognition as one of the greatest Latinists of his time. As a non-monarchical government, the English republic was.considered a threat to the European order, much like the Soviet Union was seen as a threat to theUS/Western European order in the 20th century. Nevertheless, Milton was still basically the Noam Chomsky of his day. Despite the fact he didn't even like writing on social and political issues, he produced polemics on every major political issue of his time: freedom from pre-publication censorship; the right to divorce based on irreconcilable differences; separation of church and state.He wrote histories of Britain and Russia. He was a pedagogue as well as a pedagogical theorist. He was a meticulous theologian. He developed what we would recognize was an embryonic "Lockean" theory of a social contract between ruler and her subjects. He also dabbled in verse.

>> No.9448371

>>9448139
who is this melanin deprived androgyne

>> No.9448378

>>9448319
Assertion=\=Argument

>> No.9448381

>>9448139
I MISS YOUUUUUUU

>> No.9448385

>>9448139
"Intelligence" is nothing more than an oppressive structure of dominance and doesn't really mean anything.

>> No.9448395

>>9448385
That's not what yer mum said last night

>> No.9448400

God

>> No.9448405
File: 169 KB, 2848x2391, sniff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448405

>> No.9448429

>>9448405
Still photos of zizek are unnerving. He has to be pulling at his shirt and nose or else I get the feeling that he s being unnaturally constrained

>> No.9448506
File: 1.34 MB, 800x533, Krogan kek.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9448506

>>9448139
I can't tell you who IS the smartest person, but I can tell you who ISN'T the smartest.
>Me
Don't hate me for being honest m8's

>> No.9448544

>>9448139
This was answered long ago. Only someone smarter than the smartest is in a position to evaluate. Therefore, it cannot be known. Any more rehash?

>> No.9448555

>>9448139
He who laughs last

>> No.9448559

>>9448555
Nice dub trip. Laughs alone.

>> No.9448630

>>9448544
Just offer a reward or something to find the second smartest person, and then we'll know that the person who found him must be the smartest there is.

>> No.9448681

>>9448630
Are you the smartest now because you came up with this?

>> No.9448745

>>9448630
fucking retard how do you know who the second smartest person is

>> No.9448782

>>9448630
I think the hustle's more vitalizing than money, dear. I think even the third smartest is doing, has done, will do exactly what he or she wants. Probably something as forgettable as preparing himself for death, when it comes right down to it. Just a hunch, of course.