Quite dense, but if you put in the energy you'll be on the edge of your seat

[Anonymous No.9441630]

[Anonymous No.9441631]

>>9441630
Nice work.

[Anonymous No.9441654]

>(((Goldberg)))
Aint falling for your science jew

[Anonymous No.9442069]

>>9441654
Yep, Science is hard

[Anonymous No.9442416]

>>9442069
>science
>hard
These days computers successfully do 99% of science for humans, it can't be that hard if it can be reduced to crunching 1's and 0's

[Anonymous No.9442447]

>>9442416
Sentiments like this are why those who study the liberal arts are often mocked. What a ridiculous position. I could reduce all the cognition of your experience to the firing of neurons in your brain to ons and offs a la transistors a la 0s and 1s

[Anonymous No.9442718]

>>9442416
>science is doing sums

[Anonymous No.9442738]

>>9442447
Name one scientific activity that requires a necessary human agent

[Anonymous No.9442950]

are you full of shit OP? or are you actually getting on riemann surfaces/einsteinian topologies

>>9442416
you're so ignorant it's actually a little adorable, science doesn't stop

[Anonymous No.9443131]

>>9442416
Oh Christ

[Anonymous No.9444861]

>>9442416
this basically

[Anonymous No.9445046]

>>9442738
Origination of a hypothesis
Or if you want to be a real smartass, one half of the Wave-Slit Experiment

[Anonymous No.9445069]

>>9442416
Computers really are doing 99% of the science with regards to how much time would be spent if we had no computers. But humans are doing the parts computers can not yet do (which is really hard).

[Anonymous No.9445249]

>>9442447

>He fell for the physicalism meme

[Anonymous No.9445300]

>>9445046
It doesn't have to be observed by a human. The point is any information taken from the experiment will determine where the light goes.

[Anonymous No.9446299]

>>9441630
>tfw I failed a test on this and got kicked out of course

I come to /lit/ to get away from this shit.

[Anonymous No.9446595]

>>9445300
The information determines nothing, the observation of that information collapses possibility. An agent (dasein) is certainly required.

[Anonymous No.9446891]

>>9446595
A computer can act as an observer. It cannot store quantum informatiom

[Anonymous No.9447068]

>>9445300
The point is that observation is not a passive process, and by doing it in any way, you're distrubing the system. The slit experiment is fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.9447242]

>>9441630
>tensor analysis
>dense
>literally an n dimensional generalization of shit you learn in first year vector calculus.
GR books literally cover all the tensor stuff you need in a chapter or two how the fuck could anyone find this shit 'dense'

[Anonymous No.9447252]

>>9447068
stopped the faggot that failed the introductory QM course

[Anonymous No.9447805]

>>9447068
>>9446595

[Anonymous No.9447839]

ill just leave this right here

[Anonymous No.9447846]

What books can make me a smart science boi?
Consider the fact that I think intergrals are magic

[Anonymous No.9447856]

what book should i read to get into formal logic?

[Anonymous No.9447999]

>>9442416
You're joking, right?

[Anonymous No.9448361]

>>9447846
Start with Spivak's "Calculus". Try to work out every problem, look up answers when you get stuck, then come back and ask for your next assignment.

[Anonymous No.9448489]

>>9448361
>>9447846

Apostol calc

also any book written by someone with a math/journalism background, Zero was pretty good.

And, of course, you can always start with the Greeks with Euclid's Elements.

[Anonymous No.9448586]

>>9442738

Induction into the practice, and the actual practice.

What do you think 'science' is?

[Anonymous No.9448592]

>>9446595

Dasein=/='agency'

[Anonymous No.9448611]

>>9442738
proof making

let me know when a computer can solve the completeness problem, I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.9448615]

What's a good "advanced" grammar book?

[Anonymous No.9448633]

>>9447242
>lol this stuff is so simple you guys haha wow fucking brainlets
>GR covers all you need to know about the subject
I wish physics faggots who hunk the,selves big enough to talk about math would stop breathing.

[Anonymous No.9448645]

>>9448633
Think*
Themselves*

[Anonymous No.9448672]

>>9442069
>>9448611

MATH ISN'T SCIENCE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.9448680]

>>9448489
Is Elements just seen as historically relevant, or would it also help a math illiterate like myself progress on to more modern work.

For some perspective, I've just recently started apostol's calculus.

[Anonymous No.9448682]

>>9448672
computer science is math...in case u didn't notice, things that are really science don't have to be called "science", like physics is physics, chemistry is chemistry, but political science is ... what it is, computer science is a branch of math, which is not science

[Anonymous No.9448683]

>>9448672
fuck off

[Anonymous No.9448695]

>>9448682

COMPUTER SCIENCE ISN'T SCIENCE

physics and chemistry and sociology and all ur bs is science aka gay shit

[Anonymous No.9448696]

>>9448680
no, it would ab-so-lutely help. Don't worry if it seems overwhelming at first, just take your time.

I'd still recommend going through the introductory chapter of apostol at least (it's a great summary of all the basics especially if you do the exercises), but Elements is also free!

[Anonymous No.9448712]

>>9448696
why should anyone approach geometry from an old greek book vs something more approachable written more recenetly

[Anonymous No.9448729]

>>9448712
because, again, it's free and what it does isn't obsolete or irrelevant today.

It's a great exercise in formulating an axiomatic system that may not be as complete, but works off a more relatable premise

[Anonymous No.9448762]

>>9448696
Thanks, I'm mostly interested in learning math as a hobby, so I'm not in any rush to get to the top of my class or something like that. I'll check it out.

[Anonymous No.9448774]

>>9448762
keep it up. Math is useful for its own sake

[Anonymous No.9448803]

>math
>science

[Anonymous No.9449893]

>>9448633
im not a physics faggot, my point was that if physics brainlets can easily learn tensor analysis its not 'dense'