[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 167 KB, 312x276, 4e14676c-3de7-44e0-b857-1b140e55613b[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424039 No.9424039 [Reply] [Original]

This is what I've understood so far:
Marx being a student of Hegel took the latter's system and applied it into the material world, right?
Does that mean that he wanted to create an utopia where the Spirit in actuality is constantly grasping the Notion so that Mind can reach some sort of earthly (was it ever some sort of metaphysical thing?) state of Absolute because everyone and everything is mediated together, therefore the constant Becoming becomes Being because is constantly understood by Mind (due to the fact that Spirit is complete, because the Notion of actuality is all mediated), and so we become the One (Substance, God, non-otherness, is-not)?
Is it a social system designed to unite ideas (and both socially and individually make sense of the world) what Marx wanted? Is he a dogmatist anti-life?

>> No.9424054

Marx was a brainlet

>> No.9424106

>>9424039
Your analysis is corrected but it's wrong to say Marx applied Hegel to the material world. Hegel is already constantly engaged with the material world, yet tempers the sensuous with the Idea, bringing about the ideal. Meaning, he combines the material with the Platonic idea and brings about Spirit and its affect on historical development. Marx gets rid of any notion of anything non-material, and says it's not a conflict between Ideas and the purely sensuous, not a conflict in Spirit, but is just class struggle which will produce the kingdom of ends of global proletariat communism.

>> No.9424434
File: 19 KB, 326x454, 1492801441076.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9424434

>>9424039

>> No.9425359

bump