Is he the only /moderndaygenius/ to exist?

File: 62 KB, 213x159, blocks your path..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:02:20 2017 No.9266567 [DELETED]

Is he the only /moderndaygenius/ to exist?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:04:18 2017 No.9266575 >>9266567 no just some old guy who has taken milo's place as the champ for the alt-right with no fathers

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:07:28 2017 No.9266588 File: 1.35 MB, 852x492, dealing with communists 5.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266575 I am detecting large amounts of left wing butthurt emanating from this post. Sort yourself out.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:07:55 2017 No.9266591 >>9266588 im right wing dumbass

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:09:40 2017 No.9266598

I wish /lit/ could address this guy on the basis of the work that he devoted 90% of his life to, instead of this one political controversy that only just materialized, but I guess /pol/hate-boners are too strong. Which is understandable, but unfortunate.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:11:33 2017 No.9266604 >>9266591 of course you are

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:15:52 2017 No.9266620 File: 37 KB, 350x350, 0b2b602a3b5b8ffc4cd9f4c2069cd41c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266588 Is that Sean Bean

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:19:03 2017 No.9266632
File: 14 KB, 320x294, monalmaosa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9266591
>im right wing dumbass
>>9266575
>the champ for the alt-right with no fathers
linguistically you're the kind of person who uses "problematic" at least once in every conversation.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:19:44 2017 No.9266634 >>9266598 have you actually been reading the board?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:20:24 2017 No.9266638 >>9266632 Empirically you're the type of retard who has not read a book since High school

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:21:13 2017 No.9266642 File: 128 KB, 960x960, fedora sir.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266638

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:22:39 2017 No.9266649 File: 153 KB, 640x640, Eggplant_Emoji.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266632 >if you don't like the alt-right you can't be right wing

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:24:14 2017 No.9266653
File: 240 KB, 1014x986, harold-bloom1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9266598
We have, if you were paying attention when people started trying to move from posting about him to talking about Jung or the Gulag Archipelego his horseshit was ripped apart and laughed off the board and never spoken about since.
All that remains left for his fans are just to ironically spam him as a meme just like they did with Milo or any other alt-right sophist.

Thoroughly dispatched.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:24:48 2017 No.9266656 >>9266649 I said nothing about your preferences, only the way you talked. I'm not a fan of whatever "alt-right" is supposed to mean either, but I don't talk like a twenty year old professional blogger in a Brooklyn coffeeshop.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:25:58 2017 No.9266663

>>9266649
hilarious eggplant emoji

why are left wingers so indubitably smart? every single one i've come across in my entire life is just a shining example of true intellectualism, per se.

definitely not the sludge at the bottom of the human barrel at all.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:26:17 2017 No.9266666 File: 892 KB, 500x342, pure_ideology.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266567

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:26:53 2017 No.9266671
File: 34 KB, 448x380, master race.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9266656
>but I don't talk like a twenty year old professional blogger in a Brooklyn coffeeshop.

No instead you talk like an obnoxious manchild who unironically thinks gamergate was a significant turning point in history

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:29:09 2017 No.9266677 File: 527 KB, 520x525, 285ea9ac2c124e712dd20d05ca2d8b294a27bc7fbf555fedbf8845d56d2a150a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266666 >those quints The dialectic continues

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:29:35 2017 No.9266680 >>9266567 >please call me "her" I'm trans >no >wtf I'm famous now!

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:30:10 2017 No.9266682

>>9266653
Except I just read a thread last night wherein there was actual discussion on the man (in between the political shitposting) and he clearly was not "dispatched" as you say because the thread was not a united symphony of derision against his every point. Again, regardless of your opinion on his politics he remains a modern literary figure and deserves to be addressed. Also last I checked we didn't stop talking about people because their ideas were wrong - if that's the only criteria you can come up with for who deserves a thread you might want to go back to /sci/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:31:27 2017 No.9266686 >>9266682 >Also last I checked we didn't stop talking about people because their ideas were wrong Of course we fucking do if we have a brain. I suggest you might gain a lot from spending time on /sci/ yourself.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:31:47 2017 No.9266689 File: 134 KB, 239x387, busta.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >obnoxious manchild Okay. Here's a (You): >>9266671

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:33:13 2017 No.9266694 File: 192 KB, 778x1024, 1489420136132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266671 drumpf btfo how can he recover

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:34:12 2017 No.9266696 >>9266689 >>9266694 >resorting to pure image based reasoning Go start with the Greeks

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:35:33 2017 No.9266704 File: 236 KB, 506x507, pwned.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266696 >it's the "image based thinker" autist go and cum in some leftist dross like Baudrillard you pseud faggot your world is going away- and it's never coming back

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:36:29 2017 No.9266709 File: 88 KB, 326x326, smuganimu22.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266686

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:36:54 2017 No.9266711 >>9266704 >>9266694 i can't tell if this is a parody of a /pol/ poster or legit anymore

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:37:34 2017 No.9266713 >>9266711 It doesn't even matter anymore

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:38:00 2017 No.9266715 There are three (3) reasons why /lit/ doesn't like this guy: 1) He isn't an edgy, fedora-tipping atheist, 2) He isn't a literal communist; and 3) A small fraction of his fan-base hold conservative beliefs. And that's that.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:39:05 2017 No.9266720 File: 121 KB, 680x1000, do it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266711 >>9266713 >that feel when the leftist is completely demoralized and deactualized just as planned

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:40:21 2017 No.9266722 File: 196 KB, 549x354, ideology1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266720 >clinton >leftist

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:40:51 2017 No.9266728 >>9266715 >1 /lit/ basically invented the 4chan "convert to Christianity as a reaction to modernity" and hated New Atheists even before that happened >2 most of /lit/ isn't Communist >3 A lot of /lit/ is reactionary

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:41:17 2017 No.9266730 >>9266720 >he thinks that democrats are leftists This is what happen when you're education only includes /pol/ infographics

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:42:06 2017 No.9266731 >>9266715 so we don't like him because we don't like his outlook? that's pretty unfair of us!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:42:41 2017 No.9266732 >>9266728 >Communist pls be more specific

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:42:45 2017 No.9266733 File: 28 KB, 200x200, smug pepe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266722 >zizek >leftist >>9266730 my education is of far greater prestige than you're's my unthinking friend

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:43:32 2017 No.9266738 >>9266722 >>9266730 And let me guess, a hundred million dead bodies has nothing to do with it also, correct?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:44:01 2017 No.9266740 >>9266715 >>9266728 >Communist pls be more specific

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:44:43 2017 No.9266745 >>9266732 >pls be more specific Most of /lit/ isn't Communist, how much more specific do you need to get? Communism is a more or less well-defined political ideology, unless >Communist >pls be more specific is a new meme

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:45:47 2017 No.9266747 >>9266738 i just couldn't live with the question "what if one more had done it?"

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:47:55 2017 No.9266753 >>9266731 Communism is an objectively incorrect outlook. Everyone knows this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:49:26 2017 No.9266759 File: 119 KB, 500x428, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266738 >muh 40000000000 kulaks

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:51:27 2017 No.9266768 >>9266738 Capitalism has killed more people than communism. >inb4 "that's not real capitalism!" >inb4 "those deaths do not count!"

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:52:16 2017 No.9266770 File: 7 KB, 300x180, oy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266759 >muh 6 bazillion poolaks

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:52:39 2017 No.9266772 >>9266759 B-but that wasn't TRUE CAPITALISM™ Chomsky

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:53:39 2017 No.9266776

>>9266759
>>9266768

"The obsessive hatred, bordering on psychosis, against products — i.e. against man-made objects — seems to be the hallmark of the pseudo-intellectual today. Hatred of consumption, a problem which no sane, healthy person has ever had. As if food and clothes, as if eating or dressing were bad. Such is the pseudo-intellectual's craving to appear to be raging at something, that he will rage at life's basic necessitities if need be.

The "consumer society" should have been called the "slave society", since there's nothing wrong with consuming, it is indeed the basis, the prerequisite, of all growth. Marx was at least healthy in focusing on production; Baudrillard's obsession with consumption is neurotic. Why not reduce it to zero and die of thirst in a few days, you fucking nihilistic little prick? Better yet just stop breathing; oxygen too is something that we consume.

What is "capital"? It is simply another word for money, which is a medium that facilitates exchange. Capitalism, then, is merely a state of things in which individuals are able, and allowed, to enter into exchange. That's all it is. Capitalism = Exchange. And since it is impossible for any culture and civilization at all to exist without exchange (indeed exchange is the number one prerequisite for civilization, with language itself understood as a form of exchange, the exchange of feelings), we might as well say that Capitalism = Civilization. To be against capitalism, then, means to be against civilization — which is par for the course for the kind of subhuman dreck which perpetually champions this nauseating, decadent notion. Just take a good look at them and you'll see."

How can lefturds EVER recover? (they can't)

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:53:41 2017 No.9266777 >>9266770 >Haha I'm ironically implying they're subhuman and you're a jew so you're wrong Kill yourself scum

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:54:50 2017 No.9266785 File: 80 KB, 569x768, I wish my scarf was a noose.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is the level of discourse this man encourages here

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:56:26 2017 No.9266793 >>9266745 well if it's "more or less well-defined" then good. 'member back when Communism wasn't a more or less well-defined political ideology?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:57:26 2017 No.9266795 File: 212 KB, 543x768, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266776 >ahah lefties are sooooo dumb (props to capitalism! elon you rock!! \m/)

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:58:28 2017 No.9266799 File: 200 KB, 1434x724, LMFAO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266777 awful trips awful post >>9266795 and you people say pol has bad infographics another awful post

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:59:13 2017 No.9266803 >>9266776 this is worthless because it begins with misunderstanding of what it is these people criticize about "consumer society". they're not opposed to clothes or food. a complete strawman.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:59:19 2017 No.9266805 >>9266759 What a fucking hack of a opinion that are way more people alive now because of capitalism.Hes sick ideology could not resist past the 50 years.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 09:59:54 2017 No.9266806 File: 127 KB, 638x479, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266799 >those deaths don't count!!!!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:00:16 2017 No.9266808 Cringiest video I've ever watched

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:00:20 2017 No.9266809 >>9266793 >'member back when Communism wasn't a more or less well-defined political ideology? So the 1800s? No. What point are you trying to make?

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:01:23 2017 No.9266817
File: 51 KB, 640x416, thought provoking wow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9266803
>this is worthless because well basically communism works and jews criticize capitalism so there

>>9266806
wtf im #FULLBLOWNPINKO now I want to genocide my own self now

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:01:56 2017 No.9266820 SORT YOURSELF OOT EH

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:02:02 2017 No.9266822 >>9266805 there are more people alive today because of advances in industrial/agricultural infrastructure and medicine. population has been increasing worldwide, whether a country is capitalist or communist.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:03:00 2017 No.9266824 File: 1.82 MB, 1500x2000, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266770 Yeah, those damn jews.... Heil hitler xD

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:03:05 2017 No.9266825 >>9266817 it's worthless because he assumes people are criticizing food and clothing and proceeds from there. false premise.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:03:48 2017 No.9266830 >>9266806 So we are actually in a race...hmm that makes sense now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:04:56 2017 No.9266834 >>9266824 >nazis were corporate fascists BASED as long as it makes lefties mad i'll vote for it >>9266825 you assume the "people" doing criticism are actual people therefore your premise s a false premise

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:05:34 2017 No.9266838 >>9266834 pathetic

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:05:50 2017 No.9266839 >>9266759 >Any death that occurs under a capitalist system can be attributed to capitalism itself Woah... so this the power of the left

>>	Fwaaa ... Mon Mar 20 10:06:11 2017 No.9266841 >>9266567 Yes, now kys

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:06:30 2017 No.9266843 File: 98 KB, 825x631, boinie colorised.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266838 he can still win

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:06:52 2017 No.9266845 >>9266822 Show me all this advances done in a communist regime?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:07:30 2017 No.9266846 >>9266839 >any death that occurs under comunist system can be attributed to comunism itself It feels weird when the tables are turned, isn't it?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:08:05 2017 No.9266850 > people are unironically communist W-what? Am I being memed?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:09:11 2017 No.9266854 >>9266845 >he knows nothing about the rapid industrialization and the avantguardistic scientific research under the USSR >he thinks that communist under the USSR were just dumb retards plowing the soil while drunk on vodka

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:09:35 2017 No.9266855 not the only one but I love him for bringin some more positive PR to psychology amongst right wingers

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:10:13 2017 No.9266857 >>9266850 Do you know anything about communism? >inb4 "I have larned about it in high school and on the internet :)"

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:10:35 2017 No.9266858
File: 29 KB, 696x413, trump laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9266850
there are still a few residual germs that like to lurk on lit

it does not matter as the population has been entirely inoculated with trump, just point and laugh, shitpost a little and make them squirm

those poor little snowflakes in their self-imposed ideological gulags. Sad! LOW ENERGY!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:10:38 2017 No.9266859 >>9266855 Thats not a good thing, psychology deserves every bit of ridicule it gets

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:10:46 2017 No.9266860

>>9266809
that if something doesn't keep getting evolved and becomes "well-defined", it's not a legitimate ideology anymore, it's a brand.

and therefore belongs to capitalism.

and it does; in the Western world, the post-Cold War has seized it and uses it merely as a means to it's own end -- a dishonest, verbal weapon

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:12:34 2017 No.9266866 >>9266859 Hwhy

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:13:15 2017 No.9266873 >>9266854 >Dude let's kill tens of millions to get a monkey in space lmao that would be avantguardistic lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:13:20 2017 No.9266874 >>9266860 >and therefore belongs to capitalism. I'm glad no university professor will ever have to put up with your pathetic reasoning

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:13:46 2017 No.9266875 >>9266866 Its a pseudo-science built on assinine and naive philosophical assumptions

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:14:10 2017 No.9266878 >>9266808 How so?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:15:27 2017 No.9266884 >>9266878 it didn't have enough funny reddit meme references for him to "get" it :(

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:16:41 2017 No.9266887 File: 56 KB, 380x411, 1838047.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266884 >literally the title of the video is a reddit tier meme movie reference

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:18:00 2017 No.9266889

>>9266873
>"duuude we need more oil"
>"who cares, just fuck up some country in south america or in Africa, prop a random dictator and steal it from them"
>"duuuuude you're a genius"

Reminder that apparently most people on this thread still have not examined their ideology.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:18:11 2017 No.9266891 >>9266846 >Gulags, death camps, famine, lynchings, cannibalism etc. is at all comparable to third-worlders dying from typhoid Really tickles my pickle.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:18:20 2017 No.9266892 >>9266857 Yes, I've read communist works, you ironic elitist. Are you seriously convinced that people are intrinsically selfless, loving and sacrificial, and that all crime is merely forced on the criminal by circumstance?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:19:34 2017 No.9266896 >>9266874 me too, they're the pioneers in abusing theories to whip practical effects of self-defined social justice (not that Marx was much better) you're on a thread about Jordan B Peterson, do you even know who he is?

>>	Fwaaa ... Mon Mar 20 10:19:47 2017 No.9266898 File: 14 KB, 265x300, 1481536666757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266776 >The obsessive hatred, bordering on psychosis Lel talk about projectio n

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:20:15 2017 No.9266899 >>9266887 >classic western is reddit i get you leftists hate our culture but please make it less obvious next time >>9266889 based, cant wait to ruin more brown people countries under trump

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:20:35 2017 No.9266900 >>9266854 it is one thing to greentext, but you offer no concrete example

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:22:14 2017 No.9266907
File: 71 KB, 499x499, 1461610641774.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>when you realize that the vast majority of discussions about Communism on /lit/ is caused by anti-communist posters
>We would just be talking about books and abstract philosophers otherwise

Dat thesis and anti-thesis

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:22:42 2017 No.9266909 File: 34 KB, 500x500, 1489977970260.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266686 >/sci/

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:23:13 2017 No.9266912 >>9266875 What, that you can measure/monitor cognition?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:23:31 2017 No.9266915 >>9266899 >Clint Eastwood >Classic Western I'd take some time to actually learn about "your culture" before pretending you're defending it retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:24:10 2017 No.9266917 >>9266722 She's a trotskyite

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:24:23 2017 No.9266918

>>9266900
>Romans have not invented anything
>"you're an idiot"
>but you have not given me any example!!!!

Do I have to teach you everything you don't know, even if these informations are easily available?
Pick a fucking book and read.

>>9266892
>muh human nature
You're a walking clichè

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:24:34 2017 No.9266920 >>9266912 For a start yes but thats just the icing on the cake

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:26:19 2017 No.9266922

>>9266567
Peterson is letting the memes get to him... but seriously, all the exposure and support he has been receiving seems to be rapidly inflating his ego. Anyone else noticed this? Whether he had a big ego before is debatable, but now it is clearly showing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:26:19 2017 No.9266923 File: 399 KB, 1152x1536, neets4her.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266915 helloooooooo reddit!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:26:54 2017 No.9266925 File: 53 KB, 780x520, 1407134_Peter_OTool_314846b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266899 Holyshit you're dumb, you realize Conservatives used to decry against Spaghetti Westerns as being a degenerate desecration of a Christian genre

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:27:04 2017 No.9266926 >>9266920 We know you know nothing about neuroscience.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:27:56 2017 No.9266928 >>9266926 Irrelevant

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:28:04 2017 No.9266929 >sort yourself out but you're the fucking psychologist, that's your job not mine

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:28:13 2017 No.9266930 >>9266918 Like you expect everyone to do research each time you give an argument ? this is very poor anon I feel bad for you

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:28:37 2017 No.9266932

>>9266795
The current system isnt as good as this perfect utopia I read about in this book. I know a bunch of other guys tried it created a literal hell on earth every single time, but they just weren't reading the book well enough. When I'm in charge things will be better.

Commies make me sick

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:28:43 2017 No.9266933 >>9266925 drumpf btfo yet again by another left wing /lit/ intellectual elite

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:29:33 2017 No.9266936 File: 65 KB, 750x500, PETER-OTOOLE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266933 All in a days work my friend

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:32:15 2017 No.9266947 >>9266918 > You're a walking cliche So that's a yes, then? Good to know.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:32:41 2017 No.9266948 >>9266878 >>9266884 It's the most Reddit-tier video I've ever seen. Le good the bad n the ugly reference

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:34:51 2017 No.9266951 >>9266948 >classic western is reddit i get you leftists hate our culture but please make it less obvious next time

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:35:07 2017 No.9266952

>>9266930

>Like you expect everyone to do research each time you give an argument ?
Of course. What do you expect from me? To value your arguments when their built on ignorance and apeculation? Of course I expect you to know what you're talking about.

>>9266932
What you're saying is that you're fine with having more people dying cause of preventable causes only because you don't like the idea of communism.

By the way those are only the preventable deaths, if you factor everything else that is still linked to the system you get a much more dreadful image.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:35:07 2017 No.9266953 I like Peterson but this was genuinely cringy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:35:46 2017 No.9266956 >>9266918 Please tell us all the great things done in the Roman comunist regime.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:35:48 2017 No.9266957 >>9266951 The movie isn't bad, dork but referencing it in relation to yourself with a title like that is Reddit-tier Back to >>>/r/thedonald you go

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:37:23 2017 No.9266960 File: 98 KB, 679x758, record corrected.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266957

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:38:00 2017 No.9266961 File: 30 KB, 280x341, leopold bloom.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266951 >>classic western He keeps saying this

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:38:04 2017 No.9266962 >>9266960 Upvote!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:39:03 2017 No.9266965 File: 77 KB, 407x581, the face of pol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266960 Huhuh 'magine being that ugly

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:40:16 2017 No.9266966 File: 235 KB, 894x1200, 1489061103857.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266961 i love how you're proving your case, really a strong argument here >>9266962 thank >>9266965 yeah

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:41:08 2017 No.9266967 File: 335 KB, 2048x1536, 1485389094413.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266966 Good thing we Right Wing men are so handsome

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:41:48 2017 No.9266971 File: 218 KB, 350x645, 5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266967 #StopFascism

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:42:38 2017 No.9266973 File: 158 KB, 1200x1000, 1482943513337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266971 Agreed brother, high test to the max

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:43:29 2017 No.9266975 >>9266952 >lets enforce death maybe we get rid of the preventable ones someday Do you admit any of your ideology mistakes ever?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:44:16 2017 No.9266976 >>9266971 holy shit I am loling

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:45:03 2017 No.9266979 File: 223 KB, 866x334, holy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266973 greets comrade, let's embrace the asperger revolution! #FullCommutism

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:46:44 2017 No.9266983 File: 101 KB, 660x898, 1480375033725.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266979 Nice try commie, you'll never overcome the masterrace

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:47:34 2017 No.9266986 File: 355 KB, 980x653, 1489166529019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266983 say NO to hate and YES to refugees!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:49:22 2017 No.9266990 File: 509 KB, 1024x768, EDL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266986 Never, I wont let the glory of White Culture fall

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:49:52 2017 No.9266991 this thread has to be satire.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:49:58 2017 No.9266992 File: 477 KB, 646x500, 1488780081546.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266990 Are you voting with the cool kids? I am.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:50:47 2017 No.9266998 File: 166 KB, 1295x849, asdfasfd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266992 Never, Alt-Right is the new Punk Rock

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:51:34 2017 No.9267002 File: 134 KB, 647x684, 1482852326712.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266998 Match me on reddit.

>>	Fwaaa ... Mon Mar 20 10:53:38 2017 No.9267007 >>9266998 Punk rock is controll opposition

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:57:39 2017 No.9267020
File: 42 KB, 428x405, end me.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>it's yet ANOTHER left wingers get btfo thread

WHY CANT WE EVER WIN ANY MORE BROS??? WHY DO WE ALWAYS LOSE?!?!?!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 10:59:00 2017 No.9267026 >>9266575 He's literally a leftist whose entire problem is being forced to use words he doesn't want to use.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 11:05:42 2017 No.9267042 >>9267026 yeah nah, he's not a leftist at all. he volunteered for the NDP as a teenager, was disgusted by the people he met there, and then left to became the meme we know and love today.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 11:06:03 2017 No.9267045

>>9266991
What's satirical about this thread? Just a bunch of revolutionists plotting the overthrow of the upper classes and bemoaning the lack of women in our factory jobs. I for one can't wait to slaughter everyone above an arbitrary income threshold: that's the only way to save humanity! Everyone except for me, that is - I promise to give all of daddy's money to charity as soon as the revolution is complete and there's no longer any risk associated with being poor and without skill.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 11:07:27 2017 No.9267046 >>9266952 >preventable hindsight bias

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 11:26:57 2017 No.9267101 superb thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:23:00 2017 No.9267329 >>9267020 Leftists were always doomed to lose.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:23:34 2017 No.9267332

>>9266952
Why do you think communism is the only solution to preventable deaths? We are in the most prosperous time ever because of globalization, by every metric. The simplest solution to preventable deaths is to foster free trade so we can lift people out of poverty. Maybe you can join a charity and volunteer to go to third world countries and prevent preventable deaths. That's a much more reasonable solution than upending the entire system because it doesn't live up to the standards in your head.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:24:42 2017 No.9267336 File: 9 KB, 237x239, 1488142575701.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9267332 >by every metric

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:26:39 2017 No.9267345 >>9267332 Capitalism is antithetical to freedom. I rather the world burn than live as a slave

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:30:37 2017 No.9267363

'Oh boy, i tell ya, the Lion King, well that's about unconscious impulses which no one can access but that's what it is you know, and here's the meaning to take from it'

'Oh boy, I tell ya, we don't know enough about the unconscious to trust anyone who claims to explain it or change it'

He is the biggest hack in the world, but he is diligent, i.e. he is constantly thinking terribly about things most people can't be bothered to think about and just by virtue of having thought about these things, he's deemed wise because it is his pitiful, scrambled knowledge, teaching those with zero knowledge.

He wants to be a martyr.

Also just look at the fucking guy, even if he had good rational faculties, they're reliant upon natural inferences and understanding which are filtered through so many abstract, nonsenses he has constantly floating around him that he acts as though he's in a dream all the time.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:33:04 2017 No.9267373 >>9267345 You're just a resented faggot, if it is really so bad why don't you just kill yourself instead of wanting 'the world to burn'?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:34:14 2017 No.9267377 File: 150 KB, 245x320, 814206047_2019824.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9267373 >why don't you just kill yourself instead of wanting 'the world to burn'? What a ridiculous question

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:37:23 2017 No.9267385 >>9267363 wtf I hate JP now Seriously, either provide proper criticism and a better alternative or fuck off. Your vague cynicism is just shitposting.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:41:48 2017 No.9267406 >>9267385 Its an expressionist rather than an analytic argument, get fucked if you're mad for it, its mostly all Peterson does.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:44:36 2017 No.9267413 >>9267373 >>9267377 Why be afraid of hatred? There's nothing wrong with burning.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:45:44 2017 No.9267415 >>9267413 This. Resentment is the most authentic motivation there is. Dude needs to read Moby Dick

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:55:25 2017 No.9267445 >>9266891 No, but it is comparable to third-worlders dying from those same issues lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 12:59:48 2017 No.9267459 He has way too much faith in IQ.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:10:18 2017 No.9267485

>>9267336
For the most part, yes. I think there's spiritual issues like what
>>9267345
pointed out. But materialisticly speaking things are better now across the board.

To the other poster. You're making yourself a slave by calling yourself one. Besides, you're already a slave to your biological impulse, circumstances, and culture. Your ideal of freedom is arbitrary, and it's unlikely you'll accomplish anything. Clearly you're incapable of being what you want to be, otherwise you wouldn't call yourself a slave. Instead of admitting you're at fault, you blame the world. Then you channel your efforts into changing the world, and ignoring yourself, even though you're the problem. Since you were incapable of succeeding at your personal goal you're clearly incapable of accomplishing anything external, an immeasurably harder task.

Just admit that you're at fault, take on responsibility. People go to work to keep on the lights and feed their kids. You're reducing every human being who isn't a rich neet to nothing. All while pretending like you champion them. Your ideology makes me sick. You should be ashamed of yourself.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:17:31 2017 No.9267515 >>9267415 I don't think the moral was that resentment was a good thing in cap. Ahab lol Monomania =/= motivation

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:21:55 2017 No.9267535 >>9267515 Maybe from your pleb reading but I got a different message

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:26:40 2017 No.9267562 This was, by far, the most autistic thread I've seen in months

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:28:46 2017 No.9267571 >>9267345 What is your definition of freedom, running around naked with no technology?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:32:51 2017 No.9267590 >>9267571 Not being subjected to the schizophrenic machinations of a hyper-real desire producing post-human superstructure.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:34:51 2017 No.9267594 >>9267590 that means yes btw

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 13:36:53 2017 No.9267605

>>9267590
>I want freedom except where other people exercise freedom in ways i disagree with

Reminder that Communist tendencies are strongly correlated with autism, since Communism requires all people to behave alike and autists have no concept of mind, and therefore cannot envision people who think or behave differently from themselves.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:12:00 2017 No.9267807 >show him to my stupid lib friend >He finds nothing in him insightful or challenging Typical 22 y.o. ideological pseudo-intellectual liberal spiritual desert

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:14:21 2017 No.9267818 >>9267594 If it comes to that, so be it. I embrace the tableau rasa brought by the cleansing flames >>9267605 Not an argument

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:14:45 2017 No.9267823 File: 503 KB, 1000x500, issue-30-poster1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9266567 TRANSPHOBIC! PIECE OF SHIT! TRANSPHOBIC! PIECE OF SHIT! TRANSPHOBIC! PIECE OF SHIT!

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:15:58 2017 No.9267833 How do you all feel about his jabs at postmodernism? Do you agree with him, or does he misunderstand it?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:18:08 2017 No.9267849 >>9267833 He at once both thinks that Derrida speaks nothing but incomprehensible nonsense yet his "movement" somehow led to the total domination of academia and society at large. Do the math

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:18:21 2017 No.9267851 >>9266891 It is when said third worldes don't have access to readily available drugs because of capitalism, and that's just the tip of the iceberg

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:18:53 2017 No.9267854 >>9267818 >not a meme way to prove you're not autistic, my dude. I honestly don't have a problem with the notion of communism but by the time you're out of third or fourth grade you should understand that it's naive.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:20:16 2017 No.9267861 >>9267854 I'm not a Communist, I see it only as a potential means towards emancipation

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:22:35 2017 No.9267867 >>9267861 Yeah but it's not that, though. So what are you doing?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:22:38 2017 No.9267868 >>9267849 Just because something won doesn't mean it's the right way.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:26:35 2017 No.9267888

>>9267849
The point is that it's deliberately obscuritanist, meant to hide points that if stated outright couldn't be said in polite conversation, let alone seem fashionable among the ivory-towered academic elites. Because it's so poorly written, adherents to the ideas don't ever have to argue or defend them, they can simply say you've misunderstood them and imply that you aren't smart enough to keep arguing with. This is a huge advantage when ideas are meant to compete through argument, in a system ostensibly designed to find the best ideas.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:29:16 2017 No.9267898 >>9267868 >>9267888 The vast contradiction is though is how could he have become so successful and influencial if he is both inpenetrable and worthless?

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 14:36:01 2017 No.9267933

>>9267898
read >>9267888 one more time. In a system where ideas are expected to be expressed clearly and accurately, Derrida's have an advantage that is totally apart from their fitness, since they are deliberately written in such a way as to avoid argumentation altogether. In a system where argumentation is what exposes flaws in ideas, Derrida's grew wildly because proponents of the idea were able to in-effect accuse any critics of stupidity (by saying they were unable to understand the ideas) and thus avoid any real argumentative selection process.

that's not to say that there isn't a superficial attraction in the notion that literally everything is a social construct and that absolute truth is impossible, but the implications of these ideas are deleterious to society, since you wind up categorizing all human interaction in terms of vicious power struggle, meaning there can be no benefit to cooperation and thus invalidating any attempt to bring people together in helpful ways, since you can always just accuse anyone trying of attempting to impose their power/will on you.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:07:34 2017 No.9268156

>>9267933
You talk as if there is some magic force that makes people believe a thinker matters. You're speaking about how he avoids scrutiny but not how he holds any appeal in the first instance before that would even matter.
Believing that Derrida's work involves "the notion that literally everything is a social construct" is fundamentally wrong and shows you have zero grasp on his significance in hermeneutics

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:18:51 2017 No.9268247 File: 17 KB, 337x372, waow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9268156 >mfw you end up proving the point of the person you're arguing with WEW E W

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:19:48 2017 No.9268257

>>9268156
Okay so let's go over this in the light of how I explained the idea selection process
>you're saying it's magic
No, it's pretty clear that i'm saying it's a emergent system whereby ideas are separated from chaff through argumentation. Ideas written with the intent to dissemble their true nature have an advantage, since they can avoid the selection process by avoiding argumentation. Every published author is guaranteed to have some proponents, someone in academia will always go to bat for an idea. That's not magic, just an easy assumption to make.

And I'm gonna just say that every pomo proponent says "the fact that you summarized the idea without using any of our obscuritanist vocabulary shows you are fundamentally unable to grasp the idea" and that it's always an example of what I was saying above, and nobody can EVER explain Derrida's absolute basics in normal English in under 5 sentences, since his basic ideas are pretty hard to believe in if stated without their trappings of overwritten bullshit. Tell me where I'm wrong in my admittedly highly truncated summarization of Derrida's thought without calling on some type of pseudo-mystical undefined vocabulary that I'm "just too dumb to grasp" and that you will never ever define.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:22:12 2017 No.9268272 File: 350 KB, 838x554, poststructuralism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9268156 Additionally if you google "epistemic charity" this will go much more smoothly.

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:29:46 2017 No.9268318

>>9268247
>You put the minimum of effort into understanding why people think a thinker is important instead of just making shit up
>HAHA YOU PROVED MY POINT

Dude

>>9268257
>>9268272
You should know from being on 4chan for over five minutes that argumentation isn't a selection process so much as merely a force to sophisticate and polarize pre-existing positions.

Here's a simple explanation, Derrida writes about how language by its nature can not wholly represent reality and that ultimately can be analyzed to reveal it is at its foundations self referencial. That the true nature of reality can never be reached through rational discourse but rather if it can be experienced at all can only be through intuition and thus any attempts to express a conception of reality will be by definition flawed and these flaws can be revealed through a process he borrowed from Heideggar called Deconstruction.

This is well beyond the pale of your Victorian tier notion of "social constructs"

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:43:15 2017 No.9268395

>>9268318
See, that's obscuritanism right there. Wittgenstein already defined language as an imperfect way to express reality in Philosophical Investigations. What does Derrida add to this?

>"Through Deconstruction, we can see the flaws in linguistic expressions of truth"
Okay, so why do people who espouse Derrida seem to behave and speak in such a way that this means there is no such thing as truth PERIOD?

Anonymous Mon Mar 20 15:43:41 2017 No.9268399

>>9266728

>/lit/ basically invented the 4chan "convert to Christianity as a reaction to modernity" and hated New Atheists even before that happened

you do realize this has been happening for literally 150 years? did you even read Dostoevsky at all? large chunks of his books are rants against socialistic atheists and how they lack morality

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/lit/ - Literature