[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 16 KB, 836x454, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215257 No.9215257 [Reply] [Original]

Has all the reading you've done paid off, anon?

https://www.arealme.com/vocabulary-size-test/en/

>> No.9215294

Nice try, malware.

>> No.9215298
File: 100 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_2017-03-09-16-48-29.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215298

>tfw vocablet
I'm still young, I have time to learn more words, right?

>> No.9215307
File: 25 KB, 977x573, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215307

>>9215298
check your white collar privilege

>> No.9215311
File: 29 KB, 653x451, shakespearebb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215311

ama

>> No.9215316

>>9215311
when are you going to start inventing words?

>> No.9215329

>>9215316
Please read.
I am Shakespeare--I already have.

>> No.9215334

kek I am 19 and got 30500, are you people really this stupid?

>> No.9215337
File: 13 KB, 706x429, My_Vocabulary_Size_is_about_【22500】!_What_about_you_-_2017-03-09_18.58.46.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215337

>>9215257
>not even a native speaker
wew, step your game burgerland

>> No.9215340
File: 17 KB, 1035x471, english vocabulary size.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215340

>>9215298

>30-year-old businessperson

Why do they use this as the midway between 14-year-old high school student and Shakespeare?

>> No.9215343

>>9215334
To be fair some of these are open ended, like where it says synonym for 'related' and both pertinent and intrinsic are options. Both could be an answer.

>> No.9215345
File: 21 KB, 672x586, 1_million_iq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215345

I knew 45 of 50. I guessed at the other 5.

>> No.9215349
File: 209 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20170309-190136.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215349

>> No.9215353
File: 110 KB, 750x1334, IMG_2205.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215353

>>9215257
Fite me irl OP

>> No.9215355
File: 41 KB, 679x456, 0838754081.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215355

get on my level plebs

>> No.9215360

>>9215343
Actually, pertinent is only the correct answer. two things can be related without one being intrinsic to the other or vice versa.

>> No.9215372
File: 91 KB, 750x1334, IMG_2206.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215372

my English language requires effort

>> No.9215376
File: 58 KB, 720x872, IMG_20170310_010824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215376

Oh wow.
Not a native, by the way.

>> No.9215377

>>9215343
>Intrinsic synonym for related
Yeah no wonder your score is shit, pleb

>> No.9215391
File: 244 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_2017-03-09-20-12-33.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215391

>tfw you can't break 30k

>> No.9215393

>>9215349
I got 29800, but I didn't bother screen-capping because I was certain someone would've beaten me first.
>>9215376
O look: another one.

>> No.9215411

I got 29800 and guessed ~15, why doesn't it say how many were correct?

>> No.9215423

>>9215411
The entire test is a sham that wildly inflates your score so that you share it on social media. I wouldn't wouldn't worry too much about it.

>> No.9215433

so is it only possible to get in the 10k, 22-23k and 28-30k range? 14 year old, white collar and shakespeare are the only results? Shit test

>> No.9215451

>tfw 22500

Gonna have to start reading with a dictionary again i guess

>> No.9215530
File: 42 KB, 802x424, Screen Shot 2017-03-09 at 7.40.51 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9215530

>baneful
u u u u

>> No.9215642

>it's a 4chan takes an online test and everyone turns out to be a genius thread
Really activated my almonds, lads.

>> No.9216233
File: 37 KB, 788x437, Screen Shot 2017-03-10 at 5.09.07 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216233

>>9215355
ok

>> No.9216275
File: 55 KB, 874x590, validate me senpai.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216275

shamefurrr dispray :*(

>> No.9216561
File: 16 KB, 781x395, nice.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216561

>synonym of spade
>think: "black person"
th-thanks Inherent Vice

>> No.9216565
File: 68 KB, 749x880, IMG_1556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216565

huh, I don't even read

at least I'm not a wordlet

>> No.9216571
File: 54 KB, 750x796, IMG_1555.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216571

Post other languages you know too.

I've been self studying Korean for two years.

>> No.9216585
File: 32 KB, 818x472, asds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216585

>>9216565
Are you me?
I haven't read a text that wasn't for education in years.

>> No.9216611
File: 228 KB, 1051x1442, 2017-03-10 01.12.09.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216611

Seems like there's a major split in /lit/ between the ~30000ers and ~23000ers. I blame /pol/.

>> No.9216638
File: 14 KB, 660x429, vocab size.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216638

>>9215372
Did you even try?

>> No.9216708
File: 27 KB, 734x453, Screenshot_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216708

>>9215257
Wow I suck arse...

>> No.9216719
File: 52 KB, 1334x750, IMG_1790.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216719

>> No.9216740

>>9215345
got the same as you.

vocab bros for life :)

>> No.9216771
File: 95 KB, 1486x924, Screen Shot 2016-07-12 at 12.42.24 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216771

>>9215376
Fucking vocablets shitting up our board.


Screencap saved from last time you guys made yourselves look bad :^)

>> No.9216801
File: 157 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20170309-233014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216801

>> No.9216811
File: 214 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20170310-023514.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216811

t h e y c a l l m e d i l d o s w a g g i n s

>> No.9216831
File: 51 KB, 801x467, Screen Shot 2017-03-10 at 2.46.37 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216831

Don't hate me cuz u ain't me!

>> No.9216853

>>9215340

Because the test is pretty shit and almost entirely unreliable?

>> No.9216864

>>9216853
t. got a low score

>> No.9216936
File: 229 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20170310-003628.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216936

honestly surprised

>> No.9216947
File: 13 KB, 757x429, results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216947

Swedish.

>> No.9216956
File: 16 KB, 610x412, Shittytest.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9216956

>>9215257
>Has all the reading you've done paid off, anon?
I've read from start to finish only 3 books in the past year.

>> No.9216971

>>9215307
what is the antonym of contrafibularity?

>> No.9216986

>>9216971
antidisestablishmentarianismist

>> No.9216999

>>9215257
22,800: Top 5.33%

How did you save the image?

>> No.9217015 [DELETED] 
File: 38 KB, 800x441, Plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217015

>>9215311
Prithee teacheth me, ye goode 'en wise sir. How dost thee learn thy faire wurds?

>> No.9217021

>>9216999
screenshot m8

>> No.9217024
File: 38 KB, 800x441, Plebs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217024

>>9215311
>>9215345
>>9215349
>>9215355
>>9215376
>>9215391
>>9216233
>>9216565
>>9216585
>>9216611
>>9216771
>>9216801
>>9216811
>>9216956

Prithee teach me, ye good'n wise zurs. How didst 'ee learn thy faire wurds?

>> No.9217073

>>9217024
they opened a second tab and searched the answers.

>> No.9217075
File: 27 KB, 1213x620, german nazi fag here.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217075

german fag here...deal with it

>> No.9217578

>>9217024
Thou'rt a stout carl

>> No.9217689

>>9217073

Your insecurities are showing anon

>> No.9217706

>>9217073
t:22000 score

>> No.9217769

>>9217689
dumb phoneposter

>> No.9217796
File: 312 KB, 1364x1742, Screenshot_20170310-083733.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217796

>>9217024
From gazing the upon the written word, thou fimpleton

>> No.9217868
File: 40 KB, 754x469, wewww.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217868

hw tu improbe?

>> No.9217926

>>9215307
I'm on 14-year-old level too. Didn't know my vocabulary was that small.

>> No.9217964
File: 17 KB, 632x449, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217964

>>9217796
pleb

>> No.9217982

>>9215307
I got the same score; 10,400. In spite of that I've written two novels, a third on the way, and my Grammarly regularly tells me that I have a higher vocabulary than something like 99% of Grammarly users. I seriously think something is missing here, I'm not even a burger...

>> No.9217995
File: 19 KB, 715x466, 1234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217995

I'm Icelandic and I actively write down words I don't know and make an effort to learn them.

>> No.9218018
File: 26 KB, 1018x401, Screenshot from 2017-03-10 16-51-39.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218018

>>9215376
>>9217075

Swede here. Why are anglosaxlets so illiterate?

>> No.9218087
File: 30 KB, 943x639, Vocab.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218087

Honestly surprised.

>> No.9218128

Context clues you fucking mongoloids. Can't believe I share a board with you brainlets.


Engineering student, read occasionally, guessed on a few questions

>> No.9218139
File: 19 KB, 883x435, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218139

>>9218128
and yet I'm too stupid to attach a fucking picture. Kill me

>> No.9218145
File: 25 KB, 632x461, vocab.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218145

>>9215257
was not expecting this
>tfw walking thesaurus
brings me much oblectation

>> No.9218167

>>9217024
read books on an ereader
highlight anything you don't know
put them all in anki after you're done reading
memorize
enjoy yuge vocabulary

>> No.9218188
File: 34 KB, 709x437, voca.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218188

I'm very surprised at this, considering I'm a third South American third worlder.

Still, I got all giddy when I knew a synonym to widow because I read 1Q84

>> No.9218191

>>9218139

That's one severe inferiority complex you have there

>> No.9218201
File: 20 KB, 801x445, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218201

>>9215337
Non-native bro!

>> No.9218210

>all these scores below 23k and above 28k

weird innit

>> No.9218213

What is the antonym of autistic?

>> No.9218233
File: 32 KB, 661x900, Sin título2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218233

>Tfw too smart for /lit/

>> No.9218304
File: 21 KB, 776x473, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218304

>>9215257
Anyone who's not top 1% needs to GTFO /lit/ desu.

>> No.9218307
File: 190 KB, 750x1334, IMG_1824.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218307

>>9215257
I read a lot.

>> No.9218314

>>9218128
Yeah a lot of these were easy to narrow down just by looking at what part of speech the answers are.

>> No.9218329

>>9218213
normie

>> No.9218339

> Top 0.23%
>You are Shakespeare! You can even create new words that will expand the English dictionary.
Heh... nothing personnell, kid...

>> No.9218342
File: 15 KB, 633x395, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218342

>> No.9218375
File: 16 KB, 728x446, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218375

>>9216571
Two semesters of Spanish five years ago.

>> No.9218386

>>9218128
>>9218139
Haha, I'm >>9218304 and I'm a math major. Humanitiesfags BTFO.

>> No.9218387

I got 30325 on the English (my native language) and 18000 on the Spanish, but that number is surely inflated since many of the more learned terms I knew from cognates in English or knowledge of Latin roots, and my conversational skills are far worse still. For instance, since the tests seem to closely mirror eachother across languages, they probably asked what a synonym for "shovel" (which I had forgotten was pala), which I was totally unable to figure out.

>> No.9218424

>>9217024
vocabulary.com

>> No.9218491

>>9217073
projecting

>> No.9218492
File: 41 KB, 712x476, Screen Shot 2017-03-10 at 12.04.16 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218492

I guess I'm dumb lol

>> No.9218498

>>9217073
I bet you thought 'intrinsic' was a synonym for 'related'.

>> No.9218543

>>9218188
I knew that one from Series of Unfortunate Events lol

>> No.9218587
File: 61 KB, 480x854, Screenshot_2017-03-10-13-30-57.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218587

>>9218498
Not that anon, but I bet you didn't even catch the sly reference in the question asking for the antonym of foul.

>> No.9218624
File: 61 KB, 480x854, Screenshot_2017-03-10-13-41-45.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218624

>>9218587
10 years since I took courses in high school Spanish and I hear people on my dad's side of the family use it every once in a while as both his parents came from Puerto Rico. Kinda surprised I scored as highly as I did.

>> No.9218698
File: 69 KB, 1365x646, twf too smart to lift.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218698

>>9215257
>https://www.arealme.com/vocabulary-size-test/en/

>> No.9218700

>>9215311
vry nce m8

>> No.9218841
File: 25 KB, 753x619, Sin título.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218841

>> No.9218850
File: 28 KB, 883x659, Sin título.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218850

>>9218841
And Spanish. Surprised that there isn't a bigger difference desu.

>> No.9218905

>>9217964
Du bist ein pleb, arschloch

>> No.9218936
File: 29 KB, 977x476, rthr.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218936

Yeah I call bullshit on this test.

>> No.9218969

>>9218587
>Not that anon, but I bet you didn't even catch the sly reference in the question asking for the antonym of foul.

I only caught that one because I love me some Macbeth.

>> No.9219084

>>9218167
>>9218424

Dude, nice! Thank you. These are good suggestions.

>> No.9219861

>>9215257
Took the test and got 9800. Took the General English Level test and got English professor. Somethings not right in my brain.

>> No.9220116

>29975

Weird.

Also, I'm certain that my score (and others') are due to this being a multiple choice test. That other vocab test is a lot harder since you have to straight up say "do you know what this word means" rather than using associations/eliminations.

>> No.9220404
File: 32 KB, 700x445, 1460497298309.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9220404

>sample size of 50 can supposedly be extrapolated to tens of thousands of words
This test was some humanities level bullshit.

>> No.9220434

>>9220404
Each question involves 6 words; synonym or antonym, then the main word, and then four which you must choose from. If you select the correct word then you've proven you understood all 6 words to some degree. Still, a maximum of 250 words, plus synonym/antonym, supposedly being enough to tell if you understand up to 30,000? Yeah, unlikely.

>> No.9220498
File: 14 KB, 499x775, 4ar_Arbeiter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9220498

>>9215257
10.350, the vocabulary of a 14 year old in the US.
That's embarassing, I thought I'd do better.Then again, English isn't my first language.

27.450 in my native language (German).

>> No.9220507

>>9220404
Allow me to enlighten you in the methods of modern statistics: It's all bullshit.

Statistics are shortcut to doing hardwork. They give you approximate results for large populations, but upon closer or specific examination they are rarely accurate.

>> No.9220547

>>9220404
How large the language is doesn't make any difference to how accurate a sample of 50 questions is (assuming the language is much larger than 50 words). Imagine flipping a coin x number of times to test whether it's fair. Does the fact that you could flip it infinity more times make the results less accurate? What effects the accuracy of the results is only how larger the sample is and whether it's a good sample.

>> No.9220603

21750

Most words I missed were Frog words.
Bad test. Anybody can create neologisms.
Ebblient: adjective, describing something that is distancing itself from another.
e.g., "Their relationship was ebblient."

Where's my Nobel, Zimmerman?

>> No.9220619
File: 814 KB, 604x717, distorted kek.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9220619

>>9220603
>being this much of a brainlet in denial

>> No.9220637

German:
>4390
Bullshit. I have 1000 words at most.
>>9220619
>vocabulary
>intelligence
top kek

>> No.9221114

>>9216638
Lol how hard was it to do that?

>> No.9221127

22,500 @ 18 years old
Good? Or do I need to read more

>> No.9221166

>>9221127
By /lit/ standards, more.

>> No.9221176
File: 214 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20170310-193814.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221176

>>9215257
>>9215298
>>9215337
>>9215340
>>9215353
>>9215530
>>9215307
>>9215311
>>9216275
>>9216561
>>9216708
>>9216719
>>9216831
>>9216936
>>9216947
>>9216956
>>9216999
>>9217868
>>9217995
>>9218188
>>9218201
>>9218233
>>9218492
>>9218624
>>9218698
>>9218841
>>9220603
>>9221127
>>9218342
Get on my level faggots

>> No.9221179
File: 30 KB, 616x411, so ez.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221179

https://www.arealme.com/online-english-grammar-test/en/

Step up

>> No.9221181

>>9220637
>not understanding that high intelligence always necessarily leads to large vocabulary
>being this much of a brainlet
top jej

>> No.9221218

>>9221176
>replying to everyone in the thread who scored lower than you while ignoring the fact that many people scored higher
wew

>> No.9221272

>>9221179
i got a 116, anyone get a higher score?

>> No.9221299
File: 61 KB, 640x1136, IMG_0220.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221299

My first time... I don't think I did too bad.

>> No.9221329

>>9221179
>>9221272
>tfw 108 brainlet

>> No.9221331
File: 20 KB, 833x579, dick_size.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221331

Whoop-dee-doo, I'm posting my dick size. I will scan and see who has a bigger dick than me.

Do you have a bigger dick than me?

>> No.9221341
File: 241 KB, 1242x2208, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221341

eh, i'm happy with it.

>> No.9221363

>>9221272
>>9221179
I got 116, but I'm pretty sure the max is 120.

Anyway, does anyone understand the bedroom question?

"It's my sister's bedroom"
"How many people live in that bedroom?"

>> No.9221370

>>9221363
The apostrophe was after the s, meaning there was more than one sister.

>> No.9221372
File: 16 KB, 480x454, it's just a number.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221372

That's the problem with kids these days. They read too damn much and they don't watch enough TV.

>> No.9221378

>>9221370
yeah this is what i said. i think it was the last question that threw me for a loop, wtf are any of those things, i never learned conventional grammatic terms, i just went with what "sounded right" in my head.

>> No.9221403

>>9221179
I got a 108 and it said I'm top .01%. It wasn't that hard. Are normal, average people really that stupid?

>> No.9221405

>>9221218
or rather

>i googled all the definitions

>> No.9221421

>>9221403
These tests probably just say you're way above average so that you'll share them on Facebook. 108 out of 120 is pretty good though

>> No.9221422

>>9221378
i think it was misplaced modifier

>> No.9221426
File: 111 KB, 236x321, oh really capaldi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221426

>>9221405
>haha surely no one knows more words than me, they must have cheated lol
ok kid.

>> No.9221429

>>9221422
i selected fallen subjunctive since it sounded cool as fuck. a subjunctive out of the lord's favor.

>> No.9221430

>>9221403
>>9221421
Both of you are correct.

>> No.9221444

>>9221422
According to the comments it is. I felt like "hand-sewn embroidered flowers" was wrong and "hand-sewn" seems like a modifier so I just guessed that

>> No.9221500
File: 16 KB, 496x408, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9221500

I barely, BARELY read.

>> No.9221986

>>9221500
Why are you here?

>> No.9222007

>>9221986
Because I lurk all boards

>> No.9222022
File: 17 KB, 627x420, bam.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222022

>>9221176
I think I just did.

Lmao and I'm not even native english, I think I got lucky with the 2-3 words I didn't know. That or reading exclusively in english has paid off.

>> No.9222040
File: 38 KB, 705x407, purple.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222040

fuckin yay

>> No.9222048

>>9222022
>Lmao and I'm not even native english, I think I got lucky with the 2-3 words I didn't know. That or reading exclusively in english has paid off.
How old are you and how long have you been doing this? I'm a native speaker and got a far worse score than yours ~22k

>> No.9222049

I don't get it. Do normies really suck this much? If you're under 30,000 and a native English speaker, you need to go back to school and stop socialising in public spaces.

>> No.9222053

>>9222048
I'm 24 and I've been reading english books since I was 16. A LOT of them.

>> No.9222058

>>9222048
Also I've lived in the UK for a year and spent a lot of time in multicultural environments (uni) and playing english games. I'm sure that helped as well.

>> No.9222059

>>9222053
S-shit. I'm 18 and started getting into /lit/core books when I was 16, too. Hopefully I'm not yet irredeemable.

>> No.9222064

>>9222059
Bro I only got into the /lit/core stuff when I was like 21, before that I just read whatever trash seemed enjoyable. You got plenty of time.

>> No.9222085

>>9222064
Do you prefer physical books or ereaders?

>> No.9222100
File: 48 KB, 873x481, Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 2.18.03 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222100

I have a background in linguistics so I have an intuitive sense for how words are structured for the most part. Words are easily invented.

Other than that I don't think my vocabulary is that impressive, honestly. Haven't read many significant things.

>> No.9222103

>>9222100
Someone mentioned it earlier but I'm pretty sure it's just hokey-pokey algorithms made to make you share the test on shitholes like Facebook and /lit/

>> No.9222461
File: 16 KB, 626x417, 2349087393.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222461

>>9218201
>>9215337
Twinsies

>> No.9222516
File: 51 KB, 720x761, IMG_20170311_131432.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222516

>not being shakespeare

>> No.9222522

>>9215298
Same as you but I am a 22 year old non-native speaker.

Though I imagine the majority of this board is.

>> No.9222585
File: 70 KB, 1911x449, Screenshot 2017-03-11 13.35.48.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222585

English, Czech, French (haven't used it in more than 4 years)

>> No.9222591
File: 26 KB, 722x477, hmm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222591

I've flunked a few of these

>> No.9222611

>>9222591
fluked*

Also English isn't my first language and I'm 18. How'd I fare?

>> No.9222670
File: 21 KB, 865x452, vocablets btfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222670

>>9220498
27.450 as well?
I'm not even German but Swiss and I think I've gotten everything right (it was pretty easy desu) but maybe the German test is just maxed ad 27.450.

>> No.9222689
File: 19 KB, 838x429, americucks btfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222689

>C2 certificate in English
Thought, I'd fare better...

>> No.9222719
File: 93 KB, 1366x768, harumph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222719

>> No.9222752
File: 24 KB, 1063x624, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222752

>>9215311
Wew somehow the exact same score.

>> No.9222757

>>9222611
no way you're 18 bro

>> No.9222781

>>9222757
Some people are intelligent, Anon.

>> No.9222784
File: 226 KB, 540x540, 1484924297662.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9222784

>>9222757
It's a very suspicious age to declare on the website but I've made it an autistic project of mine to try and learn as much English as possible by dissecting any material I read to bits.

I listen to podcasts as I game and I autistically pause from reading just to jot down every unfamilliar word I read in a book and then google the list after I'm done reading.

Then I record the words and definitions in a notepad document.

It's had some positive effect but it's probably never going to make me the author I aspire to be.

>> No.9222791

>>9222784
Switch Thoumst for Thy person.

>> No.9222808

>>9215372
>1 year old kids know ~300 words
lmao, shit test

>> No.9222917

>>9222781
No, I thought he's younger, bro
>>9222784
Cool, bro.

>> No.9222952

>>9221370
How so?

>> No.9223276

>>9222952

Sister > Singular
Sisters > Plural

Sister's > Singular Possesive
Sisters' > Plural Possesive

Sisters's would be silly.

>> No.9223576

>>9222049
I don't socialize in public spaces period, it goes against my beliefs regarding social behavior.

Public socialization is empty socialization.

>> No.9223593

>>9221429
>"If only He were here with me right now..."

>> No.9223615

>>9223276
Sisters's is equivalent to sisters'.

The second 's' is dropped because it makes no phonetic difference and looks ugly.

>> No.9223710

>>9217982
>>9215307
10400 here too. I know I don't have an impressive vocabulary but I also know I have a better vocabulary than an average 14 year old.

>> No.9223734

>>9223576
t. literal autist

>> No.9223843

>>9223734
No, not at all. Don't be so upset, frogposter.

>> No.9223885
File: 60 KB, 1732x583, brainlets_begone.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9223885

purple master race

>> No.9223926
File: 19 KB, 736x473, im a brainlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9223926

>>9215257
yolo?

>> No.9224100

>>9223885
Literally the patrician color

>> No.9224128
File: 157 KB, 929x486, gs3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9224128

>>9224100

do you trill rhotics?

>> No.9224184

>>9224128
What's the context of this?

>> No.9224200

>>9224184
what do you mean by context

>> No.9224214
File: 13 KB, 762x362, meh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9224214

>> No.9224225

>>9224200
What's the source of that pic, who wrote it and why?

>> No.9225110
File: 205 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20170311-152018.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225110

>>9215257

This thread is masturbatory, eleemosynary

>> No.9225114

>>9222719

How does it feel to use Google to impress strangers anonymously on a something something Rhodesian something image board?

>> No.9225320

>>9222049
Vocabulary isn't an effective measure of intellect.

>> No.9225333
File: 37 KB, 600x600, 2dd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225333

>>9215257
>first question
>What's your name?
>Hello!
>Bye bye.
>I'm Tom.
>I don't know.

>mfw my name isn't Tom

>> No.9225341
File: 71 KB, 480x854, Screenshot_2017-03-11-19-08-54.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225341

Wow I made it and I haven't read a book since ninth grade. I also didn't know the like last 10-15 words. This quiz is very flattering

>> No.9225349

>>9225333
>that's my sister's bedroom
>how many people live in that bedroom?
They didn't say anything about her level of promiscuity.

>> No.9225361

>>9225114
How does it feel to be so insecure you can't admit that someone did better on a test than you?

>> No.9225372

>>9215343
The only one that buggered me a bit was when it wanted the antonym of "compensate" and the options were "underpay" (not really accurate, it's still a form of compensation) and "extortion" (related, but the wrong part of speech to be the correct antonym).

Do y'all know which they actually wanted?

>> No.9225375

>>9225333
>>9225349
>tfw I took the wrong test
A-at least I scored top 0.01% on the grammar test, ha ha...

>> No.9225398

>>9221179
108; 0.01%

>> No.9225403
File: 35 KB, 803x566, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225403

>>9218375
That but three years and then lived in Spain for a year.

>> No.9225485

>>9215311
What does genius look like?

>> No.9225795
File: 61 KB, 1113x722, wordlet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225795

Should I kill myself?

>> No.9225847

>>9222719

>to smart for words
>to dumb to use the snipping tool

>> No.9225919

Too lazy to crop it. Shitty online test either way, but my vocabulary is absolute shit, the main way I understand complex words is just using context clues.

>> No.9225932
File: 40 KB, 671x448, Screen Shot 2017-03-12 at 00.07.33.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225932

this can't be right

>> No.9225944
File: 97 KB, 1368x910, Screen Shot 2017-03-11 at 10.09.54 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225944

Yep.

>> No.9225962

i just clicked randomly and got top 50

damn

>> No.9225966
File: 19 KB, 748x471, vocab test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225966

>didn't break 3000

Shameful.

>> No.9225999
File: 19 KB, 966x455, results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9225999

I took this test about a year ago before I decided to actually read regularly. I got slightly above the mid range a year ago compared to now.

Guess it's working, probably a lot more factors but it makes me feel good.

>> No.9226007

>>9225966
Count the number of digits again. You should be more ashamed of your ignorance at numbers than at letters.

>> No.9226020
File: 39 KB, 835x474, mydick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226020

so where's my prize bitches?

>> No.9226026

makes you a little suspicious about the test seeing how like 90% of people in this thread finished in the top .5% or so.

>> No.9226069
File: 105 KB, 1736x902, Screen Shot 2017-03-12 at 2.50.28 pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226069

kinda surprised desu

>>9226020
ayy, exact same

>> No.9226084

Pseuds.

>> No.9226108
File: 15 KB, 670x428, test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226108

Eh, English is my second language so I suppose it could be worse.

>> No.9226123
File: 16 KB, 674x438, gud.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226123

Feels good to live in a third world shithole.

>> No.9226322
File: 17 KB, 677x468, 00.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226322

Niggers.

>> No.9226511

>>9226322
nice inspect element faggot

>> No.9226717

>>9226322
It's not blue, you fucked up.

>> No.9226788
File: 17 KB, 689x473, nogooglerequired.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226788

>>9215257
With a couple of guesses

Pretty proud of myself.

>> No.9226824
File: 16 KB, 552x252, vocab1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9226824

This pisses me THE FUCK off. Is any of you reprobates prepared to make a case for any of these four options as a synonym of love? Because that's not what the word synonym means, for fuck's sake.

>> No.9226834

SPADE IS NOT A SYNONYM FOR SHOVEL WTF

>> No.9226863

>>9226834
>>9226824
for reference, I got a bit over 30k and I'm not a native speaker. I did study English at uni though. Tbh beyond a certain point a larger vocabulary is not really a good thing, using words like "avulse" doesn't reflect positively on you in any way.

>> No.9226877

>>9226834

Yes it is, git good

>> No.9227284

>>9226877
A spade is straight and made so that you can step on the end of the blade to force it into the ground. A shovel is not straight and instead has the head (i think 'leaf' would also be a nice term for it) at an angle to the handle because you use it to pick up and move, or 'shovel', as it were, loose material from one place to another. Scrub.

>> No.9227297

>>9226824
Autism

>> No.9227361

>>9227297
Yeah, probably. I'm still correct though and a fucking test on vocabulary should be at least roughly correct in its use of, you know, vocabulary. Owned.

>> No.9227414

>>9227284
They are similar instruments with similar functions.

It's the closest you can get to a synonym from the options listed anyways. More /lit/power to you for discerning the two

>> No.9227449
File: 137 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20170312-081408.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9227449

>guessed on most of them.

>> No.9227488
File: 20 KB, 423x317, Un6titled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9227488

>tfw english is my second language

>> No.9227968

>>9218233
cute that the Spanish version calls you Cervantes instead of Shakespeare.

>> No.9228205
File: 18 KB, 920x447, eatadickmarxists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9228205

Haha and I'm a /pol/ack too. Suck it libtards.

>> No.9228489
File: 35 KB, 1327x729, vocascore.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9228489

I always thought I had a limited vocab, turns out most people are a lot worse

>> No.9228544

>>9228205
>I know a bunch of words and somehow this is a defeat for marxists
wow

>> No.9229649

>>9225341
Now you know why online intelligence quizzes are bullshit.

>> No.9230063

>>9229649
Agree

>> No.9230120
File: 19 KB, 860x441, voc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230120

>ITT: Anglos being too retarded to speak their own language

>> No.9230179
File: 75 KB, 1357x905, vocab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230179

Not representative of anything, but still kinda happy with result.

>> No.9230202
File: 16 KB, 633x457, 2017-03-12_20-28-55.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230202

I've read ~50 books in my whole life.

>> No.9230218
File: 12 KB, 692x454, Capture1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230218

>>9215311
this was fun. Had to guess a couple though

>> No.9230292
File: 17 KB, 631x436, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230292

Guessed on two, it went ok.

>> No.9230414
File: 16 KB, 630x463, vocab.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230414

P A N I C

>> No.9231143
File: 336 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20170312-232633.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231143

2ez

>> No.9231335
File: 23 KB, 696x612, lit q.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231335

>>9215257
It's not timed so anyone could easily be using google to inflate their score
But using "first answer that comes to my head" rule

>> No.9231358

Around 23000, I'm not a native speaker so it's fine I guess.

>> No.9231386
File: 15 KB, 738x462, 日本語の語彙力.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231386

I feel okay with this result.

Granted, some of the latter words were the kind you never see in real life, like 齟齬.

>> No.9231828
File: 22 KB, 793x574, jpeg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231828

>you think you did good.

>> No.9232521
File: 55 KB, 628x449, Screen Shot 2017-03-14 at 12.33.15 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232521

>>9221272

I'm on point with grammar. Can't say the same for vocab though

>> No.9232622

>>9215257
>https://www.arealme.com/vocabulary-size-test/en/
I got 22950
I hate getting stuff wrong so brb killing myself.

>> No.9232642

If you are a native speaker and you didn't get "you are literally Shakespeare" you should not procreate.

>> No.9232648

>nobody else got a perfect score
Guys it's not that fucking complex. There are tests much harder than this one.

>> No.9232675

>>9221176
>linking my score in my second language as proof you're smarter than me
>actually scored less by ~2000 than I did on the English test
>being this pretentious and retarded at the same time

>> No.9233491
File: 26 KB, 751x463, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233491

>>9221444
Damn, I was about to guess that, but I ultimately chose "I don't know".

Also I'm an evil ESL, native of Czech Republic to be specific, so I'm happy with my score.

>> No.9234046

>>9232675
>actually scored less by ~2000 than I did on the English test

You keep working on those English sentences, foreignfag, maybe one day you'll be able to string together a coherent thought.

>> No.9234351
File: 25 KB, 1121x556, vocab.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234351

I guessed for half of them

>> No.9234553
File: 103 KB, 750x1334, IMG_3846.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234553

wow i'm shit

>> No.9234615

Did an burger or a tea drinking faggot make this test, nobody uses half of these words anymore.

>> No.9234619

>>9234615
yes there should be more words like "iphone" and "dab"

>> No.9234621
File: 32 KB, 725x328, American test.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234621

>>9234619
4chan hates pictures, apparantly

>> No.9234655
File: 93 KB, 791x465, vocabtest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234655

I've read 4 or 5 books (aside from technical ones) since I was 18 (31 now). Looks like NOT reading is the secret. The test is way too easy though, a verb should have 4 verbs as the answers, too easy to eliminate 2/3 answers without actually knowing the word.

>> No.9234664

>>9234621
soz

>> No.9236268
File: 60 KB, 732x891, hA6NCWt[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236268

>>9216971
Dumb test, I read like a book a year.

The test used adjectives in multiple choice about nouns, or vice versa.

>> No.9236391
File: 74 KB, 640x1136, IMG_0479.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236391