[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 30 KB, 216x231, gass2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8830043 No.8830043 [Reply] [Original]

Which authors deserved the Nobel but never won it?

>> No.8830068
File: 15 KB, 220x294, 220px-Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8830068

>> No.8830094
File: 45 KB, 1000x483, 20160622213623-jorge-luis-borges-e1466449584771-1000x483.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8830094

>> No.8830112

>>8830043
he deserved it for the tunnel.

>> No.8830261
File: 56 KB, 610x509, The truth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8830261

Is The Tunnel really a metaphor for anal sex?

>> No.8830463

>>8830261
No, it's a metaphor for vaginal sex, you gaywad.

>> No.8830505

>>8830043
Put things in perspective! Unfortunately, the Nobel Prize has been awarded to many minor writers, at the expense of many important writers. A list of the great writers who never received the Nobel Prize, notwithstanding a general recognition of their achievements, includes:
>BORGES, one of the most influential literary figures of the 20th century
>BRECHT, the founder of modern theatre
>CONRAD, one of the greatest novelists in English of all times
>GARCIA LORCA, one of the greatest Spanish poets of the last three centuries
>IBSEN, one of the greatest playwrights of all times
>JAMES, possibly the greatest USA novelist of all times
>JOYCE, considered by many the most influential writer of the 20th century
>KAFKA, greatest German novelist of the 20th century
>NABOKOV, one of the greatest USA novelists of the 20th century
>PESSOA, one of the greatest poets of the 20th century
>PROUST, considered by many the greatest French novelist of the 20th century
>VALERY, greatest French poet of the 20th century

On the other hand, absolutely minor (and sometimes terrible) writers have been awarded the prize. Since the 1990s, the winners of the Nobel Prize for literature have been chosen mostly for being "politically correct" (like Fo, Grass and Pamuk at the turn of the century). But many are simply mysterious decisions. It is difficult to understand what makes the jury prefer mediocre, provincial writers to so many greater writers. The Nobel Prize is awarded by a Swedish Academy. The writers of Sweden (a country of 30 million people) have won more prizes than the writers of all of Asia (a continent of one billion people). Is it the rest of the world that is illiterate and uncreative, or is it the Swedish academia that is provincial, nationalistic and anachronistic?

Of all literary prizes for literature the Nobel Prize has become by far the least meaningful.

>> No.8830561

>>8830505
>talks about how few asian authors have gotten it
>no asians listed among the snubs
>list includes authors whose acclaim is largely based on things published after their death
retarded pasta desu

>> No.8830632
File: 86 KB, 640x480, fedora100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8830632

>>8830261
This is what you look like right now.

>> No.8831810

Leonard Cohen

>> No.8831826

>>8830632
I think he just posted that picture because it's funny

>> No.8832211
File: 16 KB, 200x236, IMG_2698.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8832211

>>8830094
Of course Borges and Abe Kobo. For fuck's sake they gave it to damn Oe's sentimental ass and passed over Japan's greatest novelist of the past 100 years.

>> No.8832322

>>8830043
Camil Petrescu

>> No.8832380

>>8830561
>Muh affirmative action.
>Muh racial equality.

>> No.8832382
File: 92 KB, 1024x811, ourguy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8832382

/ourguy/