Is globalism good?

[Anonymous No.8716655]

[Anonymous No.8716670]

define define

[Anonymous No.8716675]

>>8716655
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.8716678]

>>8716670
it's the derivative of define.

[Anonymous No.8716680]

It has the potentiality for good since it can better foster the spread of ideas and help liberate and promote freedom for humans across the board.

Mostly though it's just capitalism going into countries with no worker's rights and keeping things cheap and steady in said countries so the powerful ones with capital can maintain their system.

[Anonymous No.8716702]

>>8716655
Neoliberal Empire= Bad

Proletarian Internationalism= GOOD

[Anonymous No.8716716]

>>8716702
This desu

[Anonymous No.8716724]

>>8716655
well it's inevitable, so we may as well figure out how to make it good

[Anonymous No.8716736]

>>8716655
No, single populations struggle to come to agreements (see shillary/trump fallout), having a globalist audience would require dictatorship

[Anonymous No.8716742]

>>8716702

This. Also daily reminder the US is a modern imperialist aggressor.

[Anonymous No.8716762]

>>8716655

Globalism isn't possible.

What we're seeing with Brexit/Trump/etc is the resurgence of nationalist populism.

Not necessarily a bad thing. It's what the establishment deserves for trying to build world peace on social liberalism and economic neo-liberalism.

[Anonymous No.8716767]

>>8716655

>"Is X good?"

Quality thread, OP.