[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 73 KB, 420x420, image_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8677342 No.8677342 [Reply] [Original]

Have you noticed the increased level of demoralisation and decadence on /lit/ since /his/ was created? lit was stripped of its pseudo intellectual / worldly innards and is coming to terms with the fact that literature is merely part of the entertainment industry. Except poetry, which has become newly pure through sheer irrelevance.

>> No.8677348

>frog picture in OP
>wants to be taken seriously
no

>> No.8677352
File: 9 KB, 225x225, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8677352

>>8677342
DELETE THIS

>> No.8677359

That's because true "intellectuals" study history, philosophy, economics etc.

Fiction is pseud central

>> No.8677362

Poetry thread

>> No.8677370

i've noticed no difference whatsoever and still have to wade through endless 'philosophical' threads to find people discussing literature.

>> No.8677371

I've never made the mistake of taking this place seriously.

It's a fucking imageboard - if I wanted to talk to people who's opinions, thoughts and work was worth a damn I'd do so face to face.

There's no such thing as credibility in a culture of anonymity.

>> No.8677373

>>8677371
>credibility
thats why you weigh and measure each post

>> No.8677378

>>8677342
I was just thinking about this a few days ago. Literature feels much more vapid now.

>> No.8677384

>>8677342
lit was quick af before his, then was slow af, and now it get back to being quick. the content is the same now as it was before

>> No.8677414

>>8677373
Sounds like a profound waste of time; anybody can say anything.

Nobody's ideas are truly their own - we have the internet - we can appear, with a little work and nouse to be whatever we wish to appear to be.

No; if you want to really talk to a person, and know what they think and why, and whether it is worth aught, then you need the fleshy article itself.