[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 66 KB, 630x420, foucault-chomsky-debate[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8606166 No.8606166 [Reply] [Original]

who was in the wrong here?

>> No.8606171

Foucault was basically giving a Foucault 101 lecture on the relativity of worldviews and value systems, discursive construction, etc., with his implicit moral stance that all discourses threaten to become tyrannical.

Chomsky was basically giving a Chomsky 101 lecture on how we should preserve real positive civilisational values like justice and moderation through critiquing stuff.

Chomsky was being Anglo, Foucault was being French. Neither was really talking to the other.

>> No.8606173

>>8606166
They're basically having two entirely different discussions, but chomsky is basic and repetitive.

>> No.8606175

>>8606166
>Neither was really talking to the other
This. It was fucking pathetic to watch

>> No.8606188

Very poor debate.

Focault's ideas are less relevant to the topic.

>> No.8606872

Philosophy was the loser.

>> No.8606878

>>8606166

I think Plato BTFO'd Thrasymachus.

>> No.8606915

>>8606872

>> No.8606969

Chomsky is a silly old man who is no longer relevant.

>muh wealth gap boys

Accelerate!

>> No.8606999
File: 21 KB, 372x362, ISHYUDDT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8606999

>>8606166

The key thing is that if someone in the audience got up and shot both Foucault and Chomsky, the world would not have been any poorer for it.

>> No.8607008 [DELETED] 

His name is French Shakespeare.

>> No.8607016

>>8606999
Idiot, would have turned them in to philosophy gods.