[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 6 KB, 301x167, philosophyy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8567877 No.8567877 [Reply] [Original]

regardless if you agree with their views or not?, in your opinion

>> No.8567897

He was done just before 1900 but Nietzsche more than anyone shook up that whole century

>> No.8567898

probably Wittgenstein or Nazi boy

>> No.8567917
File: 102 KB, 1280x720, wittgenstein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8567917

I don't care if you like his ideas or not

he is really the only answer for this question, realistically

>> No.8567920

Quine, Wittgenstein, Chomsky (linguism is kinda philosophy)

>> No.8567923

>>8567877
Sartre

>> No.8567925

>>8567920
>Chomsky (linguism is kinda philosophy)

No it isn't

>> No.8567928

Freud

>> No.8567930

husserl, heidegger and deleuze

>> No.8567932

>>8567917
I want to read his shit give me a recommendation

>> No.8567936

>>8567925
language is kinda pretty important for philosophy

>> No.8567944

Kripke and Deleuze, depending on your tradition.

Anything else is wanting to travel back in time tier.

>> No.8567959

>>8567936
Everything is important for philosophy

>> No.8567965

>>8567944
What has Kripke done though? i dont know much?

>> No.8567975

>>8567877
Nieztche, Peter Singer, Focault and Wittgenstein. Only Wittgenstein is any good of course, but 20th centruy was the worst century in history and it is reflected of course.

>> No.8567978

>>8567965
>implying you even know what Deleuze has done

>> No.8567985
File: 539 KB, 957x710, 1418446874638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8567985

>>8567975
>Nieztche

>> No.8568025
File: 63 KB, 750x539, Nihilists BTFO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8568025

Uronically, Wittgenstein is the only one of note - which is weird as he isn't THAT notable.

I've seen people bring up Quine, but all I know him for is a bit of work on Kant.

What philosophy needs is another Copernican Revolution à la Kant/Nietzsche, the latter having referred to himself (and any true genius) as the dynamite of their age. This presumes that philosophy has any future, however.

I'm not convinced. Any sort of meaningful philosophy is entirely expendable to the shallow and ill-educated consumerists of today. Hell, the humanities in general. /lit/ is pretty much a hold-out for a few patricians who yearn for like-minded people and/or patiently await (or work toward) a drastic change in society.

>> No.8568098

>>8567877

Heidegger.