/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.8564594]

Humbert Humbert was actually a disgusting predator

[Anonymous No.8564600]

Humbert Humbert was actually a crazed fantasist and almost none of it happened as he said.

[Anonymous No.8564613]

>>8564594
Girls are actually icky and Nabokov should've written about qt shotas

[Anonymous No.8564618]

>implying you wouldn't go for that dfc

[Anonymous No.8564638]

>>8564594
He admits that near the end though, or at some point. He says that his desire to have a nymphet stems from him never getting any closure on his pre-pubescent relationship since the girl died. He believed that having a nymphet exactly like the girl from his adolescence would cure him. Lolita was that girl, yet he still desires nymphets after having Lolita.

[Anonymous No.8564650]

>>8564638
so why is it still considered a "romantic relationship"? I mean, before feminist revolution

[Anonymous No.8564674]

>>8564594
Is it bad I identified more with Dolores?

[Anonymous No.8564694]

>>8564650
Who considers it that? It's pretty clear while reading it how exploitative and one-sided the relationship is

[Anonymous No.8564704]

>fucking girls once they can get pregnant
dude do you want them to die? did you not read the book?

[Anonymous No.8564711]

>>8564613
do a shota version yourself and publish it, like Pride and Prejudice and Zombies or whatever.

[Anonymous No.8564713]

>>8564711
lolita isn't public domain yet

[Anonymous No.8564726]

>>8564713
That just means you can't publish it for money. There's nothing stopping you from uploading a free pdf version.

[Anonymous No.8564758]

>>8564650
I'm don't think anyone actually does consider it romantic
It even says at the end that Lolita had been crying herself to sleep every night while Humbert was pretending to be asleep

[Anonymous No.8564811]

Humbert is a gallant chevalier compared to this bitch.