/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.8534981]

>tfw you absolutely roast some Marxist pseud in an argument on 4chan
What are some books that will help me do this more often? Big props to this bad boy

[Anonymous No.8534993]

>>8534981
Not Cool: A Guid To The Hipster Elite (And Their War On You) by Greg Gutfeld

Ive read it even has pictures and political cartoons innit. I'm sure you'll enjoy it waiting for your mom to finish buying gardening supplies at Home Depot

[Anonymous No.8535018]

>>8534981
I think Marx was right, OP.

Also, there is no such thing as cultural Marxism. Ann Coulter is a talentless hack.

[Anonymous No.8535019]

>>8534993
I don't understand why it would be bad for someone's mom to be buying gardening supplies. Did some tranny refugee get fired from Home Depot, or get stung by a bee in someone's garden?

[Anonymous No.8535030]

>Marx
>liberal

burger overdose

[Anonymous No.8535067]

>>8535019
I wasn't insinuating it is a fault of your mom to be at Home Depot with you

[Anonymous No.8535074]

>>8535030

He was a liberal leftist nu-male cuck.

[Anonymous No.8535087]

>>8535074
No he wasn't. Go back to homeschooling yourself at /pol/

[Anonymous No.8535096]

Do people actually unironically like Marx, I mean, he wasn't as bad as actual communists, but he was kind of a huge loser.

[Anonymous No.8535097]

>>8535067
Huh?

[Anonymous No.8535104]

Which female Naruto would Adolf Hitler have redpilled sex with?

[Anonymous No.8535106]

>>8535074
cringeworthy

[Anonymous No.8535116]

>>8535087
I'm redpilled, retard

[Anonymous No.8535147]

>>8535096
Like many writers, Marx only appeals to people from the same background as him, i.e. white upper middle class losers who failed at every aspect of their life despite having all of the advantages they could possibly ask for

[Anonymous No.8535149]

>>8535030
>I don't know the difference between economic liberalism and social liberalism
>I'm actually smug and proud about my ignorance
neat

[Anonymous No.8535154]

>>8535097
I said I wasn't insinuating what you insinuated. I'm sorry you didn't understand that post I just made. Hit me up if you need more help btw

[Anonymous No.8535155]

>>8535147
-isms are always born in failure.

[Anonymous No.8535165]

>>8535155
I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm just pointing out why people like him.

[Anonymous No.8535171]

>>8535147
Empirically wrong.

[Anonymous No.8535172]

>>8535149
marx was pretty socially conservative

[Anonymous No.8535174]

>>8535165
But what you said is wrong. marxism tends to appeal to colonially oppressed brown/yellow/tan people who have been making pennies while their western overlords made bank more than anything else.

[Anonymous No.8535199]

>>8535172
Maybe by "it's 2016!" Marxist pseud standards, but to rational people it's obvious that he supported socially progressive causes like the end of inequalities and hierarchies.

[Anonymous No.8535202]

>>8535174
lol that has never happened without it being pushed on them by white people

$10,000.00 says you are white

[Anonymous No.8535209]

>>8535067
Why would I be at Home Depot with my mom..?

[Anonymous No.8535212]

>>8535096
I unironically like him. If you're going to critique him, you've got to do better than
>loser

[Anonymous No.8535215]

>>8535199
engles was the one who pushed more of the liberal purely social stuff. all of marx's work was in relation to economic structures not social ones.

[Anonymous No.8535221]

>>8534981

>tfw you hide /pol/ threads

[Anonymous No.8535222]

>>8535202
Aside from obvious choices like ho chi minh, che, fidel, allende, mossadegh etc there were tons of african mugabe type strongmen who were happy to disenfranchise their educated elite and create an agrarian "paradise".

The only extent that you are right is that they read marx and took money from the soviets.

[Anonymous No.8535228]

>>8535212
he was a NEET who stole other peoples ideas and packaged them together. he personally is responsible for basically no original thought and gets credit for everything despite being a glorified journalist

[Anonymous No.8535237]

>>8535019
Oddly specific and personal reference...

[Anonymous No.8535238]

>>8535202
Yes (((white people)))

[Anonymous No.8535241]

>>8535228
>he was a neet

Aside from throwing everyone who agrees with your ideology here under the bus, it's not an argument you can make on a fair basis because so were most prominent 19th to 20th century capitalist philosophers. On top of those adding to his work throughout the years, being the direct opposites of NEETs usually

[Anonymous No.8535243]

le epic shitposting on unmoderated board me may, fuckin' dank dude

[Anonymous No.8535244]

>>8535228
And?

[Anonymous No.8535249]

>>8535243
summer is over these kinds of threads should be finished already

[Anonymous No.8535255]

>>8535222
Check'd

But you do have to admit that all of those were nationalist movements infected with communism because the Soviet Union was the only country that would finance them. I don't deny that the Soviet Union itself was following the general idea of communism, and that the West was defending the Old Guard while the Soviet Union was establishing a new one, but to claim that these were homegrown communist movements is disingenuous. A bunch of farmers did not read Marx and decide to seize the means of production.

[Anonymous No.8535257]

>>8534981
>>8534993

Wow...these books just play right into underachiever victim mentality and insecurity, don't they?

[Anonymous No.8535266]

>>8535255
>read Marx and decide to seize the means of production
That's basically what happened in Mao's case, it was too early in te lifetime of the USSR

[Anonymous No.8535294]

>>8535266
Okay, I'l give you Mao, but even he didn't really get going without foreign Soviet support later on.

[Anonymous No.8535295]

>>8535257
Well seeing as how it's now socially unacceptable to express conservative viewpoints in the US it makes a lot of sense.

[Anonymous No.8535304]

>>8535295
>every time he pushes this meme he changes the wording to concede more and more
Feels good

[Anonymous No.8535311]

>>8535295
It isn't the conservative view points that make people annoyed by Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter. When you are socially obnoxious rich contrarian media attention whores, people tend not to like you. You should be sympathetic to this more than anyone as you more than likely have throughout your entire life parroted your parents and relatives about the liberal media conspiracies at work. You do not like them because they shove ideology down their throat and the hypocrisy of rich media figures. It should be important you realize that everyone doesn't like that.

[Anonymous No.8535315]

>>8535304
I don't even know what you're trying to say. Maybe if you try and use arguments instead of memeing all day you'll actually get somewhere in life.

[Anonymous No.8535323]

>>8535315
It might be easier to understand if you had a high school reading level, sweetie

[Anonymous No.8535331]

>>8535323
You're being just as smug

[Anonymous No.8535332]

>>8535311
Yeah the only issue is that the leftists at CNN and MSNBC do the exact same thing with their viewpoints, and no both of my parents are fucking liberals stop making assumptions unless you plan on looking really stupid one day.

[Anonymous No.8535334]

>>8535331
Sorry you can't understand a basic post. Does mommy have tendies for you at least?

[Anonymous No.8535337]

>>8535199
ah the old 'MAYBE IF I ACT MORE AND MORE OBNOXIOUS PEOPLE WON'T REALIZE HOW STUPID THE THINGS I'M SAYING ARE!' technique, a good choice

[Anonymous No.8535340]

>>8535323
Lmao nice arguments ;)

[Anonymous No.8535346]

>>8535337
Please don't reply to me if you're too dumb to read my posts first

[Anonymous No.8535354]

Communists and Nazis ruin this board I fucking hate both of you

[Anonymous No.8535357]

>>8535340
Lmoa nice response ;)

[Anonymous No.8535362]

>>8535354
>/pol/ saving you from your Nihilism addiction
>complaining

[Anonymous No.8535364]

>>8535354
At least commiez make far less bait threads like these

[Anonymous No.8535371]

>>8535346
don't post unless you stop being a dingus

[Anonymous No.8535410]

>>8535354
At least the communists have actually read a fucking book

[Anonymous No.8535422]

>>8535295
White, middle class, homeowning suburb dwellers are so oppressed. As are billionaires, and poor, proud whites who just want someone to beat on.
>Wh-wh-why won't they just let me oppress people? What's this country coming to?

[Anonymous No.8535436]

>>8535422
>Believing oppression is a valid description of inequality.

[Anonymous No.8535442]

>>8535422
Well seeing as every other country that had it's white working class replaced with idiots due to globalist policies (South Africa, Rhodesia, etc. ) went to complete shit, it makes a lot of sense to see why whites would want to preserve that. Why would a working class white guy like me want to use my labor to support my displacement?

[Anonymous No.8535445]

>>8535410
Content of their reading is shit. Its like giving credit to desert terrorist for reading the entire Koran. They are still subhumans no matter what book you throw them, if any reading Communist bullshit makes you less intelligent and intellectual.

[Anonymous No.8535446]

>>8535436
Yeah, they worked hard to earn daddy's money

[Anonymous No.8535450]

>>8535410
I'm a Nazi, yet I've read far more books than you. My IQ is also higher than yours, and I highly doubt you've slept with as many women as I have.

[Anonymous No.8535451]

>>8535442
>Why would a working class white guy like me want to use my labor to support my displacement?
Because the ideology you otherwise support supports aggressive weeding out of the weak. If you cannot come up with a way to make yourself useful and hyper talented in today's world, you aren't living up to the standard you otherwise accept the role of and support. Which is hypocrisy.

[Anonymous No.8535459]

>>8535450
He's back

[Anonymous No.8535460]

>>8535445
Your whole post has the prose of an undereducated cuck. I feel bad for you people sometimes.

[Anonymous No.8535462]

>>8535446
>people being more successful than me is LITERALLY persecution

>>8535459
I never left

[Anonymous No.8535464]

>>8535462
I know you never leave your house

[Anonymous No.8535465]

>this entire thread
What the fuck happened to this board?

[Anonymous No.8535469]

>>8535460
I am a third world citizen. Non native speaker, the fact you did got the idea proves how shitty English is.

>Moby dick
>literally 9th grade level reading
>studied in American universities

[Anonymous No.8535471]

>>8535460
cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck

[Anonymous No.8535472]

>>8535451
I understand what you're saying and I'm trying. Thanks for the motivation.

[Anonymous No.8535479]

>>8535469
Uh, maybe you should learn how to speak English before talking about how easy it is.

[Anonymous No.8535505]

>>8535465

[Anonymous No.8535511]

>>8535446
>Hard work should be the source of wealth
This is the kind of stupidity I'd express from someone who unironically used the term "oppression".

[Anonymous No.8535521]

>>8535479
I can use the bastardized French anytime I want. Holy shit, you are literally a Grammar Nazi.

Stop OPPRESSING ME, you cis white male!

[Anonymous No.8535524]

>>8535465
I told you fucking Nazis who are morons and admit it, yet still think they are better for some reason, and fucking commies who are morons but won't admit it because they managed to read all of Less Than Nothing without drooling on every single page and now think they are intellectuals.

Any comfy critique threads or literature discussions are pushed aside to make room for fucking /his/-tier Philosophy 101 "debates", or /pol/-fags coming in and posting low-tier bait, that is prolonged 300 posts by the "intelligentsia" who are so smart they can dismantle any beliefs that don't coincide with their own (read: being smug dickheads until the normal people get tired and leave), but somehow not smart enough to not respond to the obvious bait.

Seriously fuck you guys, you've pretty much driven off anyone who wasn't far-left or far-right and just wanted to read and write and talk about reading and writing with some cool guys like them.

/tv/ is better than us now.

[Anonymous No.8535533]

>>8535524
/tv/ works for us now. In fact our operations managed to put Sam Hyde on mainstream media.

We are looking to the same with you. Quit nihilism and work for our superior board. We could give you the glory and fame. We need more red-pilled contemporary books.