[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 19 KB, 306x306, exyd3ka.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336396 No.8336396 [Reply] [Original]

>in and of itself

>> No.8336411
File: 1011 KB, 450x365, smooth-movements.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336411

>>8336396
> plethora
> a myriad of

>> No.8336421
File: 39 KB, 396x385, enough.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336421

>in lieu of

>> No.8336447
File: 7 KB, 232x218, 0b3754c7179a12462a7e41d4caa2f73c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336447

>as it were
>as if
>per se

>> No.8336449

>,repsectively

>> No.8336451

>>8336396
I hate good philosophy: the post.

>> No.8336458
File: 1.60 MB, 320x240, frog.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336458

>>8336396
>>>>frogposting

>> No.8336483
File: 7 KB, 255x220, 1426724729391.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336483

>assassins des fauteuils rollents

>> No.8336513
File: 457 KB, 600x450, costanza bat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336513

>>8336396

>for intensive purposes

>> No.8336529

>>8336513
Ya, that's not what this thread is.

>> No.8336537
File: 58 KB, 531x471, abhram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336537

>I

>> No.8336546
File: 1.05 MB, 1600x1067, 1458169255408.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8336546

>the aforementioned
>the latter
>the former

>> No.8336568

Fuck off all of you, pleb tryhards. The only reason you're mocking these literary microcliches, is because they're entirely common and semantically reasonable. There is literally nothing wrong with either of these examples you dolts are posting. Youre doing nothing but quoting miniscule parts of a text that are too insignificant to affect any literary merit or quality in any way. Some of you aren't just shitposting and trolling, you actually think you've criticised something. Gits.

>> No.8336644

>a priori
>a posteriori

>> No.8336704

>>8336396
>insofar as

>> No.8336706

>>8336411
What should I use instead?

>> No.8336719

>>8336706
A buncha

>> No.8336723

>perchance

>> No.8336728

> ">"

>> No.8336733

>>8336706
hella

>> No.8336758

>>8336396
>by and large

>> No.8336763

>So and no
Lol

>> No.8336861

>it as as if

>> No.8336946

>>8336568
Using them in inappropriate contexts can be annoying, I cringe when dilettantes throw them out in casual conversation where I know there are people involved who don't have the background to get anything from it.

You have to know your audience.

>> No.8336953

>>8336411
"A myriad of" makes me cringe cringe because it should just be "myriad" on its own, like numerous, you wouldn't say "a numerous of"

>> No.8336958

>>8336953
Myriad is a noun and an adjective.

>> No.8336976

>>8336706
fuckton

>> No.8337053
File: 21 KB, 253x238, 1444145178102.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8337053

>and but so

>> No.8337059

>human qua human

>> No.8337327

>>8336706
show don't tell :^)

>> No.8337366
File: 3.69 MB, 500x332, 1468440198972.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8337366

>>8336568
LOL! GOOD POST

>an horizon

checkem

>> No.8337496

>Insofar as

>> No.8337561

>>8336706
Lotsa.

On a more serious note, use a fucking thesaurus.

>> No.8337603

>>8336447
>per say

>> No.8337613

>>8337603

Grammatically correct. It checks out.

>put a sock in it

>> No.8337748
File: 6 KB, 266x189, NO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8337748

>literally any adjective that is used often

>> No.8337801

>>8336396
>>8336421
>>8336447
>>8336449
>>8336546
>>8336644
>>8336704
>>8337059
guilty lol

>> No.8337833

>>8336396
Man, I sure do fucking hate books. Anybody else?

>> No.8337837

>>8337833
I truly believe some people on this board don't even read frequently, and are only here in an attempt to validate their own intellectualism. I think a lot of them crosspost on /pol/ and /r9k/, and it's glaringly obvious that their knowledge is solely derived from internet articles and posts on 4chan.

>> No.8337846

>>8337837
no shit

>> No.8337906

>>8337837
Oh hi, Sherlock.

>> No.8337916

>>8337837
I've also come to some startling conclusions. It appears to me now that 4chan is mostly visited by unemployed or underemployed male's with too much time on their hands. Very few of the people who post here are actual academics. In fact, a good proportion of the posts are actually memes. It's hard to even tell what is meant to be ironic and what isn't sometimes.

>> No.8337925

>>8337916
Not him, but

>4chan
>mostly visited by unemployed or undermployed male's with too much time on their hands
>Very few of the people who post here are actual acedemics
>startling conclusions

It appears that it is also hard to recognize sarcasm.

>> No.8337933

>>8337925
It appears so.

>> No.8337935

>>8337933
>>8337925
>>8337916
>>8337906
>>8337846
>>8337837
fuck all y'all

>> No.8337941

>"also" at the end of a sentence

>> No.8337942

>over against
>always already

Inflicted on the English language by German (gegenuber, immer schon).

>> No.8337947

>>8337935
Fuck you, too.

>> No.8337993

> , that is,

every fucking second line in too many economics books. H J Chang is awful to read because of this

>> No.8338115

>>8336958
Technically 'myriad' is a number: Ancient Greek for 'ten thousand'.

> I have ten thousand books
> I have myriad books

>> No.8338227

>>8338115
That sounds awful though

>> No.8338249

>>8338115
That's wrong you fool. A myriad is a unit of ten thousand just like a dozen is a unit of twelve.
It's
>i have a myriad of books

Just like it is
>i have a dozen of books
instead of
>i have dozen books

>> No.8338279

>must needs

>> No.8338311

>and so on

>> No.8338323

>>8336568
What about
>like