/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.7956909]

>It's a Hegel tries to save Christianity but ends up destroying it episode

[Anonymous No.7956926]

>it's a Kant tries to put philosophy on firmer footing and ends up mind-breaking literally every subsequent philosopher with his labyrinthine ossified system of philosophy episode

[Anonymous No.7956932]

>>7956909
>it's a Zizek tries to explain Hegel but ends up discussing the ideological significance of Jacques-Alain Miller telling jokes about masturbating in Macedonia while sitting on the toilet watching Rear Window episode

[Anonymous No.7957004]

>it's a "revolution" episode

[Anonymous No.7957010]

>>7956909
Explain pls

[Anonymous No.7957045]

>>7956909
>Ttry to standardize a religion
>Burn hundreds of thousands for heresy
>End up killing millions upon millions of people indirectly through civil war and religious intolerance

[Anonymous No.7957054]

>>7957010
young hegelians (strauss and feuerbach) took hegels' system and emptied it of its attempt to reconcile Christianity. Marx also did the same

[Anonymous No.7957057]

>>7956909
This actually really hurts.

[Anonymous No.7957069]

>>7957054
Christianity (metaphysical) with empirical reality*, if I'm understanding him correctly

[Anonymous No.7957071]

>>7956909
>Hegel tries to save Christianity but ends up destroying it episode

That's because every creation is at same time destruction.

[Anonymous No.7957080]

>It's a Wittgenstein tries to convince Russel there is a rhinoceros in the room but ends up threatening him menacingly with a poker episode

[Anonymous No.7957106]

>It's a Kant tries to save metaphysics but ends up destroying it episode

[Anonymous No.7957112]

>It's a Socrates tries to justify himself and his questioning but makes the jury hates him even more

[Anonymous No.7957115]

>Its a Descartes gets called out on his flawed epistemology and write a new book with tons of pissy, half thought out rebuttals episode

[Anonymous No.7957136]

>>7957004
>it's a "Marx applies to everything somehow" episode

[Anonymous No.7957142]

>It's an Aquinas tries to save philosophy and actually does it, the absolute madman, episode

[Anonymous No.7957151]

>>7957142
>it's a "sophistry people will themselves into buying so they don't upset their parents" episode

[Anonymous No.7957162]

>It's a Kierkegaard takes a leap of faith but still ends up dying alone episode

[Anonymous No.7957163]

>>7956932
>it's a Lacan inspires revolutionary action amongst the students while paradoxically assuming the symbolic role of the very Other against which this action is directed episode

[Anonymous No.7957165]

>dad beats him
>dad wonders why son is still scared of him
>son writers letter
>mom is a pussy

[Anonymous No.7957168]

>>7956909
Its a Voltaire writes an entire book about the glory of pistachios episode

[Anonymous No.7957178]

>>7956909
>it's a Sartre creates an entire philosophy that conveniently would have people not see pedophilia as a bad thing

[Anonymous No.7957186]

>>7957071
>it's a muh thesis and antithesis lead to a motherfuckin' synthesis episode

[Anonymous No.7957197]

>>7957186
>It's a 'some idiot attributes thesis/antithesis/syntheses mumbo jumbo to Hegel' episode

[Anonymous No.7957204]

>>7957163
I believe Lacan to be a wonderful performance artist, really great stuff, maybe the best.

[Anonymous No.7957210]

>>7957197
>It's a I don't understand what hegelian dialectic is episode

[Anonymous No.7957219]

>>7957210
it's a I've never read Hegel what is the triadic development of an-sich/anderssein/an-und-für-sich episode

[Anonymous No.7957225]

>>7957219
>it's an i don't know how to greentext episode

[Anonymous No.7957229]

>>7957210
If you think that triad has anything to do with Hegel I can tell with 100% certainty you've never read him.

[Anonymous No.7957231]

I'd like to see more Hegel threads on lit tbqh senpai

[Anonymous No.7957235]

>>7957219
Only because Hegel called it differently doesn't mean that he does not use the dialectic system. Which he does.

[Anonymous No.7957238]

>>7957225
your a robot sir

[Anonymous No.7957240]

>>7957231
rec me a hegel intro and i'll buy it right fucking now i'm not joking

[Anonymous No.7957250]

>>7957240
Le Greeks

[Anonymous No.7957315]

>>7957240
annotated bibliographies on:
Hegel Metaphysics
http://pastebin.com/svA0VHwV
Hegel: Philosophy of Politics
http://pastebin.com/rLvsqzNT
Hegel: Philosophy of History
http://pastebin.com/A6ThjM2Z

[Anonymous No.7957359]

>>7957240
hyppolite: genesis and structure in hegel's phenomenology of spirit

[Anonymous No.7957436]

Why is Hegel even important? What did he contribute to philosophy?

[Anonymous No.7957492]

>>7957436
I don't know man, what Einstein contributed to physics?

[Anonymous No.7957501]

>>7956909
>It's a Hobbes tries to justify monarchy's right to rule and ends up undermining it episode

why are philosophers so shit at actually doing what they set out to accomplish lmao

[Anonymous No.7957508]

>>7957436
He contributed nothing to philosophy, but everything to pseudo-philosophy.

[Anonymous No.7957514]

>>7956909
>it's a Nietzsche tries to warn us about nihilism and the use of metaphysical thinking to hide from it and we completely ignore this core point and run with his deconstructive shit and spend an entire century taking leaps of faith into communism and other political religions to run away from the death of god episode

[Anonymous No.7957519]

>it's a Foucault fucks another man in the ass and infects him with AIDs episode

[Anonymous No.7957524]

>It's a Sam Harris ends philosophy episode

[Anonymous No.7957563]

>>7957359
this looks good

[Anonymous No.7957578]

>It's a Zizek OD's on coke but still gives the lecture anyway episode

[Anonymous No.7957585]

>>7957519
is foucault even worth anything?

[Anonymous No.7957586]

>>7957585
aids propagating

[Anonymous No.7957610]

>>7957315
Here's others on:
Marx
http://pastebin.com/whsJ10F7
Nietzsche
http://pastebin.com/gY1WwkrX
Enlightenment
http://pastebin.com/YhGuRFF7
Hobbe's Political Thought
http://pastebin.com/S1887rqq

other shit:
http://pastebin.com/u/jonstond2/1

[Anonymous No.7957613]

>>7957586
I wonder how many gays his strain killed

[Anonymous No.7957647]

>>7957080
Either way you know Russell was turned on and emasculated and wanted Witt to fuck his wife

[Anonymous No.7957652]

>>7957585
sjw and gender fluidity comes directly from him

[Anonymous No.7957656]

It's a Hemmmingway puts an ad in the classified section but he can only afford a select number of words episode

[Anonymous No.7957657]

>>7957647
Wittgenstein was gay tho.

[Anonymous No.7957664]

>>7957585
Foucaultian 'everything is political' post-structuralism is literally the sjw vs alt-right debate of today.

I don't think I'd go so far as to say that's worth anything, but he has had influence

[Anonymous No.7957669]

>>7957657
Didn't stop Russell's little fire poker from wishing

He would have raised that gay autism baby as his own

[Anonymous No.7957672]

>>7957235
that's not dialectics, though.

[Anonymous No.7957675]

>>7957436
its End, and, since Marx, its Endnotes

[Anonymous No.7957677]

All the SJW bullshit can be traced directly back to Hegel. He is the origin of irrational obscurantism.

[Anonymous No.7957682]

>>7957669
I trust you will photoshop it to the best of your abilities.

[Anonymous No.7957697]

>>7956909
>its a dickinson uses tired ass slant rhymes and proceeds to be lauded for it episode

[Anonymous No.7957703]

>>7957697
>it's a Bob Dylan is on point about 20th century female poets but everyone thinks that makes him misogynist episode

[Anonymous No.7957738]

>>7957677
It goes back as far as Kant, but Hegel is shit as well.

>If Hegel’s prostitution to the Prussian state can become speculatively intelligible, this is only at the cost of an etherealization which, ‘in itself, is consummate abjection, deceit, and travesty, or, put succinctly, definitive humanity.

>This is not to provide the ‘justification’ for a ‘dismissal’ of Hegel. Hegel remains strictly unintelligible to us, and any claims to the contrary are anaemic tokens of bourgeois apologetic. Insofar as Bataille depends upon the overcoming of Hegel he is an inanity. That ‘Hegelianism’ is a sad farce of the academy decides nothing as to its eventual sense, and if postmodernity depends upon a ‘decision’ in respect of Hegel it is a culture of accommodation analogous to Hegel’s own crude response to Schelling. The internecine conflict between germinal possibilities of post-Kantian thought is appropriately ‘judged’ by a laughter whose measure is the preponderance of capital within modernity. It is as comic as the hatred Troskyite sects bear for each other as they squabble over the management of a future whose probability slides asymptotically towards zero.

1/?

[Anonymous No.7957750]

>>7957738
>Pessimism, or the philosophy of desire, has a marked allergy to academic encompassment. Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and Freud all wrote the vast bulk of their works from a space inaccessible to the sweaty clutches of state pedagogy, as, of course, does Bataille. The most perfectly distilled attack upon institutional philosophy is probably that found in Schopenhauer’s Parerga and Paralipomena, in its section entitled ‘On University Philosophy’. By the end of this text Schopenhauer has argued that the university is inextricably compromised by the interests of the state, that this necessarily involves it in the perpetuation of the monotheistic dogmas that serve such interests, and that the consequent subservience to vulgar superstition completely devastates it;
degrading it to a grotesquely hypocritical sophistry, fuelled by a petty careerism spiced by an envious hatred of intellectual independence, and articulated in a wretchedly obscure and distorted jargon that allows its proponents both to squirm away from the surveillance of the priests, and to hypnotize a gullibly adoring public. It is scarcely surprising that he comes to conclude:

>if there is to be philosophy at all, that is to say, if it is to be granted to the human mind to devote its loftiest and noblest powers to incomparably the weightiest of all problems, then this can successfully happen only when philosophy is withdrawn from all state influence [Sch VII 200].

>This distaste has been fully reciprocated. One need only take note of Heidegger’s remarks on Schopenhauer to get a taste of the university’s revenge upon its assailants. The crass dismissal of Schopenhauer’s aesthetics in the first volume of Heidegger’s Nietzsche lectures is a quite typical example, and others can be found in Introduction to Metaphysics, his Leibniz lectures, What is Called Thinking, etc. What is at stake in both cases is not argument, however rancorous, but the relation of mutual revulsion between the academy and a small defiant fragment of its outside. Neither recognizes the legitimacy of the other’s discourse; for the university considers its other to be incompetent, whilst the part of this other—admittedly a very small part—that has seized and learnt to manipulate the weaponry of philosophical strife, considers the voice of the university to be irremediably tainted by servility.

2/?

[Anonymous No.7957774]

>>7957738
>Hegel remains strictly unintelligible
>proceeds to type the most typical academic verbose hogwash I've ever seen.

[Anonymous No.7957775]

>it's an My writing full or uncommented references and jokes and my existence just a blink in time, so nobody will ever truly be able to reconstruct how I really meant it, but I'll just distance the self's purpose from everything that's not nothing, so nobody will ever find an argument against the whole shebang episode

[Anonymous No.7957787]

>It's an Anselm creates an ultimately frivolous word game which can 'prove' the existence of anything episode

[Anonymous No.7957798]

>>7957774
>DUDE THE DIALECTIC LMAO
>WE'RE LIKE ALL THE SAME AND SHIT
>THE SPIRIT LOL!

[Anonymous No.7957813]

>>7957162
He never took the leap

[Anonymous No.7957816]

>>7957813
Implying breaking off his engagement to the woman he loved more than anything in the world in order to write his philosophy wasn't taking the leap of faith.

[Anonymous No.7957824]

>>7957816
>breaking off his engagement to the woman he loved more than anything in the world in order to write his philosophy

christians truly are cucks to the bitter end

[Anonymous No.7957864]

>>7957774
>>7957798

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I had to travel both.

[Anonymous No.7957877]

Hegel? More like BEAGLE!

[Anonymous No.7957901]

>it's a Walt Whitman has to furiously travel around New York trying to erase his embarrassing past before Emerson pops in for dinner

Just be yourself.

[Anonymous No.7957908]

>>7957112
damn nigga looks like Oliver Reed, or should it be the other way around?

[Anonymous No.7958154]

>>7957514
Aww you saved my picture :)

[Anonymous No.7958169]

>>7957877
I think you mean bagel.

[Anonymous No.7958246]

>its a emily bronte doesn't know how to write and everyone mistakes it for brilliant usage of run on sentences episode

[Anonymous No.7958370]

>Try to teach people to stop being hedonists.
Everybody fails as soon as you are dead.

[Anonymous No.7958419]

I like to think of Hegel as the feyman of the humanities: a hack.

[Anonymous No.7958450]

>It's an Augustine properly defines Christianity but everyone else is too much of a pussy to follow him episode

[Anonymous No.7958460]

>>7958450
>>7958419
>>7958370
>>7958246
the cringiest samefag ive seen in a while

[Anonymous No.7959325]

>>7957787
I just spent 10 minutes trying to think a way of communicating that I greatly enjoyed this post without it sounding gay, and eventually settled on this

[Anonymous No.7959333]

>it's a Borges spends three days trying to find a book he wanted to read before realising he'd made the book up

Doesn't get better than this folks.

[Anonymous No.7959377]

>>7957508
This. As soon as someone mentions Hegel I discard everything they say.

[Anonymous No.7959414]

>>7959377
According to Hegel, you have a chance at a happy life.

[Anonymous No.7959514]

>>7959414
According to Hegel,

>the sound of someone pooping their pants fills the corridor, something something transcendental Jesus dialectic

[Anonymous No.7959556]

>>7957519
>>7957585
>>7957586
>>7957652
>>7957664

>It is Foucault saying that all are repressed people trying to enforce their ideology that is conceived of previous repression and to even more oppress them and being misrepresented even more for repressing oneself.

[Anonymous No.7959563]

>>7957585
if you ever read humanities at a university he's bound to pop up
it's not like knowing stuff is worthless even if you don't like the person that came up with it

[Anonymous No.7959590]

>>7956909
>>7956932
>>7957106
>>7957163
classic

[Anonymous No.7959614]

> It's a Descartes attempts to unite philosophy with the sciences but ends up permanently divorcing them episode

[Anonymous No.7959901]

>its a Kant tries to fix epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics then proceeds to do so, the absolute madman! episode

[Anonymous No.7959914]

>It's a Bloom tries to "get" postmodern new sincerity but he can't discern any talent episode

[Anonymous No.7960072]

>>7959325
Thanks family (no homo)

[Anonymous No.7960158]

>>7959333

[Anonymous No.7960169]

>>7960158

This guy (in your pic) walked right by me yesterday afternoon. He told me to tell you he says "Hi."

[Anonymous No.7960198]

>>7957585
He's fairly overrated (most cited author of all time in the humanities), but pretty brilliant nonetheless. Definitely worth reading. And don't listen to all the shitposters trying to link him to SJWs. He would probably loath SJWs.

[Anonymous No.7960215]

>>7960072
Keep it in the family.

Even if homo

[Anonymous No.7960222]

>>7957524
>its a ben stiller episode

[Anonymous No.7960355]

>It's a Pound tries to save poetry but ends up destroying it episode

[Anonymous No.7960382]

>>7960355
>tfw you will never walk through night-time Venice without hordes and hordes of Chinese and Russians shoving their cameras everywhere

[Anonymous No.7960394]

It's an "Ayn Rand not so tough since getting cuck'd" episode

[Anonymous No.7960421]

>>7960382
photography was a mistake

[Anonymous No.7960479]

>It's a "Ok, Socrates, whatever. I'll agree with you to shut you up." dialogue.

[Anonymous No.7960618]

>>7957656
for sale: keks, very used

[Anonymous No.7960625]

>>7957163
isn't the young guy in the video a Situationist?

[Anonymous No.7960632]

>>7956932

[Anonymous No.7960633]

>it's a le radical freedom xd episode

[Anonymous No.7960639]

>>7957501
You'd think they were all incoherent faggots.

[Anonymous No.7960668]

>>7960394
Just imagine the scene. You bring back this lovely woman from the bar. She's more drunk than you, but you're still a bit hazy and the font door lock proved a worthy opponent. As the bolts slide back you go "ta daa!" and invite your female colleague/friend/hookup into the dark appartment. Something smells slightly musty but you have to know it to smell it and her mind isn't on that at the present. The blond laughing girl's mind is on your pants and so are her hands. The both of you struggle back and forth to undress each other and you close the appartment door with your foot. Your conquest asks "where's your room" and you grab her face and kiss it fiercely, and then suddenly grab her in one sweeping motion and carry her caveman style to your double bed in the next room.
The bed is slightly raised, but other than that it's a perfectly normal bed.
Under the bed, silent, naked, aroused but restrained, lies Ayn Rand. You tied her up as you do on friday nights, locked her chastity belt and secured the restraints on her four limbs plus shoulder straps to stop her from thrashing. She has laid for three hours in the silent dark breathing in the musty smell of the mattress's underside, waiting for you and another female to come and fuck on top of the bed while she listens, gagged and frustrated. Sometimes you two get so wild on top that the mattress pushes on her face and it's all she has to do to stop from crying out in sexual anguish, from hearing tonight's woman's moans and giggles. The woman you're fucking is totally oblivious to the fact that Ayn is splayed out underneath there. Tomorrow she will dress, you will both pinken up and avoid eye contact over an awkward breakfast, and then she will leave.
When the door closes behind her you will slowly go back to the bedroom, lift up the mattress according to the hebdomadarian ceremony and remove her warm metal belt. Here eyes, always the same at this point, will bulge at you. You will bring her to the edge of her pleasure, again and again, always never going past it, her long legs struggling and struggling to support the orgasm she cannot afford. When the night's sweat is washed off Ayn's body by a new tide of sweat, at the peak of her screaming desire, you will re-clasp her belt, ignoring her muffled pleas and prayers, and click closed the silvery padlock. Then you will untie her flushed limbs from her nightly torture bed and ungag her red mouth, and she, humbled, will start cleaning up the appartment while you read Infinite Jest.

[Anonymous No.7960691]

>>7957142
>It is theologian trying to prove that God really does exist you guys!

[Anonymous No.7961305]

>>7960639
>it's an Al-Ghazali tries and fails to refute Aristotle so he retreats to Mysticism episode

[Anonymous No.7961445]

>>7960668
That wouldn't be too bad to watch

[Anonymous No.7961592]

>It's the episode where Descartes tries to sneak a peek into Al-Ghazali's notebook, but the sunni sonuvabitch returns before he can memorize more than two pages

[Anonymous No.7961593]

>>7960668
id love to give her osme
deep dicking ;
)

[Anonymous No.7961669]

>It's a Nietzsche gets fucked in the ass by life despite the Buddha's warnings episode

[Anonymous No.7961711]

>>7957165
Shool of life.

[Anonymous No.7961740]

Its a Descartes tries to doubt everything but still presupposes the existence of God and then subsequently uses knowledge claims to create an entire ontological system episode

[Anonymous No.7961764]

>>7961740
>but still presupposes the existence of God
He doesn't though.

[Anonymous No.7961768]

>>7961764
He is full of shit tho

[Anonymous No.7961774]

>It's a Plato tries to develop the idea of universals and its dialectic through explicit concepts but uses mythological and religious imagery bullshit instead

[Anonymous No.7961823]

>>7957136
This picture hurts so much

poor uncle joe

[Anonymous No.7962315]

>it's a Marx's critique of capitalism was absolutely correct episode

[Anonymous No.7963605]

>>7957168
>
>
>

[Anonymous No.7963615]

>>7957136
I bet I could find embarrassing pictures of people who support modern right ideology

[Anonymous No.7963620]

>>7957824
saving your eternal soul in exchange for a short marriage isn't relate able to cuckolding my friend

[Anonymous No.7963621]

>>7963615
Ok, let's see them

[Anonymous No.7963636]

>it's a Mishima tries to save Japan but ends up inspiring new genres of British post-industrial music

[Anonymous No.7963655]

>>7963621

[Anonymous No.7963730]

>its a Derrida getting flustered over a simple question because 'could you elaborate' is too demanding episode

[Anonymous No.7963830]

>it's a Rick Roderick visits a west texas barbecue joint and explains Nietzsche

>it's a Rick Roderick explains Kirkegaard with a homophobic Billy Graham impersonation

[Anonyrnous No.7963856]

>>7956909
>It's an 'It's An X Episode' Episode thread

[Anonymous No.7963864]

>>7963856
>>7963730
>>7963655
>>7963636
samefag

[Anonymous No.7964018]

>>7957578
10/10

[Anonyrnous No.7964035]

>>7963864

nope

[Anonymous No.7964067]

>>7964035
ms paint tier editing. better luck next time champ

[Anonymous No.7964074]

>>7963864
Do you know what "samefag" means?

[Anonymous No.7964097]

>>7964074
i made a program that highlights posts by the same user. do you know what samefag means?

[Anonyrnous No.7964318]

>>7964097
>i made a program that highlights posts by the same user
this gives the game away of course

[Anonymous No.7964337]

It's an "It's a "clip" show "it's a post-meta "it's the episode that refers to all episodes but itself" episode about other episodes" episode" holiday special