[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 62 KB, 323x499, 618nDcfC3kL._SX321_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769813 No.7769813 [Reply] [Original]

I asked this in another thread but got no answers. Is this a good book to get into philosophy with? Currently on the Anaxagoras chapter.

Also philosophy book recommendations and so on.

>> No.7769820
File: 428 KB, 1858x1354, 7241061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769820

Will bump with what I have of the /lit/ guide to philosophy.

>> No.7769821
File: 28 KB, 267x400, 9086888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769821

Step aside plebs.

>> No.7769825
File: 368 KB, 1858x1354, 7241067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769825

>>7769820

>> No.7769832
File: 353 KB, 1858x1354, 7241071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769832

>>7769825

>> No.7769842
File: 345 KB, 1858x1354, 7241074.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769842

>>7769832

>> No.7769844
File: 509 KB, 1858x1612, 7241076.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769844

>>7769842
I don't have guides five and six for some reason. But I'll post the rest.

>> No.7769846
File: 356 KB, 1858x1204, 7241303.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769846

>>7769844

>> No.7769851
File: 418 KB, 1860x1204, 7241305.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769851

>>7769846

>> No.7769852
File: 357 KB, 1860x1277, 7241307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769852

>>7769851

>> No.7769857
File: 611 KB, 1860x2153, 7241313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7769857

>>7769852

>> No.7770680

>>7769813
I heard it's really good. I don't have it in my language and it is really expensive to import it now, so I won't be reading it anytime soon. I've read Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy and am starting Giovanni Reale's History of Ancient Philosophy. I recommend the latter, if you ask me.

>> No.7771979

Frederick Copleston. A History of Philosophy Vols. 1-9,1

http://www66.zippyshare.com/v/YJgpVF6E/file.html

>> No.7772144
File: 49 KB, 273x444, absolutely bourgeois.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7772144

>>7769820
>>7769825
>>7769832
>>7769842
>>7769844
>>7769846
>>7769851
>>7769852
>>7769857
>No Hegel
>No Heidegger
>No Kierkegaard
>No Adorno
>No Lukacs
>mfw

>> No.7772148

>>7772144

>No Post-Modernists

And nothing of value was lost, except Kierkegaard.

>> No.7772151

>>7772148
Hegel is not Po-Mo, neither is Heidegger. Both give you a really great insight in epistemology

>> No.7772155

>>7772151

>epistemology
>relevant

>> No.7772157

>>7772155
well it basically is the philosophy of knowledge, so what makes you say that it isn't relevent?

>> No.7772158

>>7772155
dude true justified belief lmao

>> No.7772163

>>7772155
Yeah, lets just not read the Critique of Pure Reason at all.

>> No.7772164

>>7772157

Because it's no longer relevant, thanks to neuroscience/etc; in the same way that Philosophy of Science is now a dead school of thought, thanks to science in general.

>>7772163

Let's not. It's no longer necessary. Keep shitting yourselves about the mysterious 'other' and the semantics surrounding the very basic question of whether or not to be an asshole, kek.

>> No.7772167

>>7772164
>mysterious 'other'
That has nothing to do with Kant though. Just because later German Idealists and post-modernists tried to use some of his ideas to compose their own shitty ideas doesn't detract from Kant any less.

>> No.7772168

>>7772164
>t's no longer relevant, thanks to neuroscience
THERE IS NO FEDORA LARGE ENOUGH FOR ONE TO GIVE THIS POST THE TIPPING IT DESERVES

>> No.7772170

>>7772164
oh god please not that!
>vomit.mp3

>> No.7772174

>>7772168

>Le vapid meme response

Do you still study the Philosophy of Science?

>> No.7772177

>>7772174
Still? I never started.

>> No.7772608

>>7769844
God damn it I was excited that this was being posted because I saved all these from when you posted it the other day and I hoped this had the missing pieces. Thanks anyway.

>> No.7773837

>>7769813
It's a phenomenal series to get into philosophy with. Follow it up with main texts and then secondary texts and you should be on your way to pure patrician hood. :')

>> No.7773843

>>7772164
Nobody pay attention to this.

>> No.7775937

can someone post the two missing Philosophy charts?

>> No.7775979
File: 7 KB, 220x220, 1417396142510.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7775979

>>7772164

>> No.7777354

>>7772164
well aint you a cheeky cunt

>> No.7777402

>>7769813

Not familiar with this book. Just read Plato for starts- don't start off with Republic either, read some of the earlier dialogues.

>>7769820
>>7769825
>>7769832
>>7769842
>>7769844
>>7769846
>>7769851
>>7769852
>>7769857

This is way too many suggestions to be meaningful to anyone just starting out.

>> No.7777408

>>7775937
yeah I want to know which ones that poster didn't give us.
>>7777402
Not really, unless you are a pleb.

>> No.7777410

>>7777354

No one actually rebutted his point, however.

Hell, metaphysics in general stopped being relevant long ago. I imagine the Post-Modernism so loved by this place will go the same way.

>> No.7777421

>>7777402
No it's not. Those charts were made by autists, perfect for 4chan's browsers--also autists

>> No.7777665

>>7769842

Anyone know if these are in an archived sharethread or anywhere else online? My dick is pretty hard for the magic stuff in particular. Ain't nothin on libgen.