[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 133 KB, 385x430, fuck off.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484652 No.7484652[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Love is just a chemical reaction in your brain.

>> No.7484657

>implying it isn't

>> No.7484678
File: 14 KB, 267x320, 1365381202198.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484678

>all our thoughts, emotions, and ideas about the world are just chemical reactions in our brains

>> No.7484682
File: 628 KB, 800x800, 1427861623600.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484682

>Lol you know all of life is just chemical reactions in your brain.
>Psychedelics don't have any merit in reality, they're just chemical reactions in your brain,

>> No.7484686

you are now aware that everything you do in your life time is pushed by a need to get a few chemical reactions in your brain.

>> No.7484688

>>7484682
>I'm a druggie who justifies his addiction by pretending that he's seeking some truth beyond reality
yeah, no

>> No.7484690

>>7484652
And chemicals are atoms, your brain is made of . Since you're conscious, atoms are conscious.

>> No.7484694

>>7484657
Yeah, so what? Of course every brain state you experience has a physical analogue. No one should find this surprising unless they are a dualist. What matters is the informational content of your mind, not the medium it is expressed in.

>> No.7484695
File: 591 KB, 905x917, 1416259124022.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484695

>chemistry is just an idea in your mind

>> No.7484696

>>7484682
This

Fucking normies pretending that their phenomenal world is more authentic than mine because theirs is based on different stimuli.

>> No.7484698

>>7484690
No.

>> No.7484699
File: 74 KB, 595x842, 0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484699

>If chemical reactions in our brains are responsible for our thoughts and feelings.
>And our choices and actions are decided by thoughts and feelings
>Then we are deterministic beings.

>> No.7484700

>>7484688
>psychedelics allowing for addiction
Top-tier meme

>> No.7484721

>>7484699
Holy unstated assumptions Batman.

>> No.7484818
File: 45 KB, 620x398, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484818

>> No.7484822

>>7484700
this

psychadelics are awesome substances, they clear your thoughts, open your mind and give you a different perspective on life and they are not addictive.

All hail shrooms

>> No.7484828

>>7484818
The person who made this and everyone that spouts off this stupid bullshit pseudo-neuroscience should be beheaded with a rusty lawnmower blade. Yes I'm mad

>> No.7484836

>>7484694
7/10 post

>> No.7484838

>>7484688
>has done psychadelics in the past
>is therefore a druggie

just end it all man. they literally are the opposite of addictive

>> No.7484844

>>7484690
Uninspired bait. 4/10

>> No.7484850

love is when she dumps you

>> No.7484851

>>7484818
One does not ENJOY these things, my sweet familio

>> No.7484891
File: 46 KB, 599x785, 1449530758690.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484891

Love is is.

>> No.7484898
File: 63 KB, 480x608, 1421255343732.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484898

>>7484652

>> No.7484908
File: 400 KB, 607x466, 1449255786658.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484908

Love is magic you cuck

>> No.7484912

>>7484818
Simple confusion between what's the cause and what's the effect of joy. But who am I fooling, this is obviously bait. At least I trully hope so.

>> No.7484943

>>7484652
>Brain is just a chemical reaction in your brain.

>> No.7484954

>>7484652
>>7484699
>>7484818
>>7484818
*vomits*

>> No.7484963

>>7484912
Not to mention there is no way you could explain an abstract phenomenological concept like "enjoyment" with the actions of just two monoamines.
>muh reward chemicals
So clueless.

>> No.7484965
File: 209 KB, 384x518, 1447438163213.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484965

>plebs can't handle reductive materialism

>> No.7484968
File: 29 KB, 260x297, black woman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7484968

>all these christposters mad about materialism

>> No.7484985

>>7484682
>pretending that hallucinating due to chemicals offer you a different 'perspective'
keeping "hailing" the shrooms and lsd's

>> No.7485001

>>7484682
hahahaha

>> No.7485006

>>7484968
>>7484965
Ok, I'll bite. It's not that "just chemicals" is wrong, it's that it actually says nothing interesting, is some real "I fucking love science" shit parroted by retards, and completely misses what makes the mind interesting on not just a higher-order symbolic level, but the lower physical level as well. "This incredibly powerful and complex computer? It's just chemicals."

>> No.7485010

>>7484652

Literally autism.

And I don't say "literally" very often.

>> No.7485018

>>7484850
But that's not love. Is it?

That feel though. I just recovered from my first breakup. Nothing like it.

>> No.7485048

>>7485006
>if it's not interesting it's bad
Sophist

>> No.7485080

>>7485006
How about you expand on "it's not that 'just chemicals' is wrong" rather than going on as to how it's not interesting? Or is it that you forgot to give any arguments due to your statement being false?

>> No.7485101

>>7485080
Okay? Yes, your brain is comprised of electrochemical interactions. The mind is not a Cartesian non-physical essence. Every state of mind corresponds to a physical state of the brain. So fucking what? Again, it is the content of your mind that matters, not the medium it is represented in. The medium is arbitrary. You could represent a mind with enough abaci, or model trains, or gas particles.

>> No.7485104

>>7485006
Agreed!

>> No.7485106

>>7485101
Cheers mate

>> No.7485119
File: 68 KB, 493x609, de_cart_is.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7485119

>>7485101
You convinced me, thanks

>> No.7485145

>Genuinely thinking that consciousness, emotions, personality, dreams etc. are ultimately anything more than physical interactions between groups of quarks
>Believing anything other than hard determinism

>> No.7485177

>>7485145
Isn't it ironic that you show contempt for those that don't believe determinism, since you think it couldn't be any other way? Of course, you yourself have no control over that.

>> No.7485178

the chemical reaction in our brain is not defined as love so it cannot simply be it. it's like saying relaxing is just your body moving its bowls around.

the chemical reaction existed before the concept of love existed. how we know love now is not how we as a species have always known it to mean.

>> No.7485183

>>7485177
That's the point, ain't it?

>> No.7485184

>>7484652

I saw that guy too. That was a pretty horrible post.

>> No.7485191

>>7485177
yes, it is ironic, doesn't stop me from thinking those who don't agree are stupid

>> No.7485266

>>7485101
Even though I agree with you now, isn't the analogy of model trains or gas particles faulty? Isn't it so that why we can communicate and form ideas like we do partially due to the chemicals that are inherent to us (and our brain)?

>> No.7485290

>>7485006
How is it wrong?

>> No.7485295

>>7485101
The 'content' is also comprised of electrochemical interactions. You just describe them using, likely very flawed, folk psychology.