[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 117 KB, 486x476, oxfordwordoftheyear2015.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360738 No.7360738 [Reply] [Original]

WAKE ME UP

>> No.7360746

>>7360738
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP

>> No.7360747

>>7360738
When u win the MacArthur fellowship but she still suckin

>> No.7360748

>word of the year
>not a word
JUST

>> No.7360754
File: 3 KB, 126x126, oh ho.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360754

>>7360738
>>7360748
>linguists' faces when going in dry

>> No.7360758

>>7360738
It can't be printed in books. It's not a word.

>> No.7360761

>>7360748
Technically it's a word, it's ":joy:"

>> No.7360765

>>7360758
>you can't print an emoji in a book

You wanna bet you little fairy faggot

>> No.7360768

>>7360758
Anything can be printed on a book, even pictures

>> No.7360769
File: 6 KB, 200x252, Madden-19763245725.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360769

>>7360738
cavemen painted pictures because they didn't have words
are we going in reverse?

is this paleo-autism?

>> No.7360770
File: 556 KB, 696x3155, 1429647924843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360770

>>7360768
>>7360765

>> No.7360771
File: 96 KB, 620x620, emoji-shakespeare.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360771

>>7360758
u wot m8

>> No.7360779

>>7360771
The Jews did this

>> No.7360807

Sure is nice living in the age of degeneracy

>> No.7360825

Why do dictionaries pander to the lowest common denominator? To stay relevant?

>> No.7360829

>>7360771
You could reprint Harry Potter in this style and nothing would be lost.

>> No.7360833

>>7360770
EVERY time

>> No.7360842

>>7360825
Uh yeah

Which educated soul needs a dictionary?

>> No.7360849

>>7360842
I don't know, sometimes context clues and my knowledge of Latin aren't enough to decipher a word's meaning, in which case, I'll use a dictionary.

>> No.7360852

>>7360842
>yeah I know all 1,000,000 words in English

>> No.7360855
File: 58 KB, 536x533, ralph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360855

>hurr non-words aren't words

prescriptivists BTFO

>> No.7360858

I can't take it, /lit/

This is next-level irony

The joke has gone too far

It was funny once but now I'm just really depressed...

WE NEED TO GO BACK

>> No.7360859

>>7360738
Isn't Oxford an English dictionary? isn't an english word

>> No.7360862

>>7360849
Then I guess you're not educated enough

>>7360852
Most of them are useless anyway

>> No.7360866

>>7360858
The state of innocence is lost forever.

>> No.7360872
File: 494 KB, 620x620, 1445914665495.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360872

>>7360866
>tfw

>> No.7360899

>>7360872
On a side thought, the very state of 'ideal perfection' which is perceived as lost is in fact created AFTER that loss of innocence itself.

>> No.7360934
File: 118 KB, 1024x675, 1446356805318.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360934

>>7360738
Get with the times grandpa

>> No.7360940

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-stuaX4_MOg

>> No.7360945
File: 25 KB, 300x314, Evola Knew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360945

>> No.7360946

>>7360855
>anything that happens is happening and i'm not saying anything at all, but it's especially good when its some nigger babble

descriptivist keks

>> No.7360949

How the fuck is that emoji getting in before some timeless emoticon like " :) "

?????????????


oxford on irrelevancy suicide watch t b h

>> No.7360956
File: 489 KB, 497x373, 1444097229543.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7360956

>>7360934

>> No.7360957

>>7360940
They just gave the plot away to the entire movie. What's the point of making a fake trailer if it's not going to act like a real trailer?

>> No.7361011
File: 10 KB, 214x317, MV5BMjMzNTIzMTkxOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwODc3MTY0MTE@._V1_SX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361011

>This whole thread
>Muh normies

Holy shit you dweebs don't really bother to think about anything do you

>> No.7361363

>>7360779
>>7360807
>muh Jews
>muh degeneracy
>>>/pol/

>> No.7361498

>>7360899
Sort of a didnt know what you had when you had it sort of thing

>> No.7361507

>>7361363
>mommy, get the memesters away from my feelings

Its just a joke you stupid bastard

>> No.7361580
File: 229 KB, 1200x1826, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361580

>>7360738
SAVE ME FROM THE NOTHING I'VE BECOME

>> No.7361600
File: 762 KB, 3508x2480, 1443621822955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361600

>>7360771
Fake. Millennial's don't understand how to use an apostrophe.

I did that on purpose because that's how all these fucking retards today are using them.

>> No.7361631

>>7360738
This would be more troubling if it were Merriam-Webster. The Oxford English Dictionary is a purely descriptive, rather than prescriptive, dictionary. It tells us how words are used, not how they should be used. So whenever a word attains a certain level of currency in some significant part of the English-speaking world, it makes the cut.

In fact, year after year it is reported by the media, usually as a lighthearted or humorous segment, that some very surprising selections have found their way into the Oxford English Dictionary. I remember a skit on Jimmy Kimmel a year or two ago in which some old fuddy-duddy speaking in a trans-Atlantic accent announced the OED's Word of the Year and then said with a sigh that he was going to kill himself. The audience laughed, of course, but it's only really funny when you don't understand the purpose of the OED.

This does seem to be going a bit far, though. I'm not sure that this really qualifies as a word. If it does, just about every symbol or signifier is a word, and that can't be right.

>> No.7361647

>>7361631

One of the issues is they don't even describe how its used properly.

Them make it seem like a function of ordinary language rather than something strung out after a black tweet like LOL T B H F A M This lil baby nigga is ugly af XXXXXXDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>> No.7361648

SHAWTY RED APPLE BOTTOM TROUSERS

>> No.7361650

>>7361647
>tfw this emoji is in the OED before something more iconic and universal like a stick figure

>> No.7361675
File: 23 KB, 499x522, b5Wuc3T.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361675

Huxley was right, we don't deserve to live as a species anymore. JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP F.A.M.

>> No.7361732

CAN'T WAKE UP

>> No.7361750

>>7360738
[laughs in English]

>> No.7361813

>>7361600
Literacy is at an all-time historical high. I'm sorry there are no longer any job availabilities in serving nibbles to orgying aristocrats.

>> No.7361828

>>7361675
i love it when people get angry about language evolution

>> No.7361857
File: 269 KB, 1024x875, VjL0eOD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361857

>>7360738
JUST

>> No.7361864

>>7361857
>they
>fucking THEY

Cynewulf and the Beowulf Poet are rolling in their graves

>> No.7361888

>>7361857
That’s not what dark web means. Also, why is refugee the only word that wasn’t invented during the last two or so decades?

>> No.7361904
File: 118 KB, 1600x900, 1433120479808.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361904

>>7361857

>refugee

>> No.7361953
File: 6 KB, 240x240, 1446770300221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7361953

>>7361828
You must be one of those faggots who take slang seriously, this is lower btw.

>> No.7361961

>>7361631
>If it does, just about every symbol or signifier is a word, and that can't be right.
that's what language is

>> No.7361967

>>736186
lol

Sent from my iPhone

>> No.7362020
File: 71 KB, 500x600, 1447570129967.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362020

>>7361813
>Literacy is at an all-time historical high

Literacy = the ability to read.

The ability to read =/= Literacy.

>> No.7362027
File: 47 KB, 460x385, rYwSFZg[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362027

>>7360771

>That top right 'he's a good boy'

>> No.7362032
File: 44 KB, 524x336, draft_lens8529101module74020401photo_1260740146microexpressions-disgust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362032

>>7360771

>> No.7362034
File: 45 KB, 119x147, neta.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362034

>>7362020

>a = b
>b =/= a
>a =/= a

>> No.7362042
File: 29 KB, 512x384, 1400008510328.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362042

>>7360738
Where's WWIII when you need it?

>> No.7362043
File: 8 KB, 480x360, skeletn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362043

>>7360738
[save me]

>> No.7362191

>>7361857
'They' sounds like something used by paranoid people.

>> No.7362199

>>7361857
I'm glad the emoji won.

>> No.7362203

>>7360738
So now the Oxford dictionary casts aside pride to appear hip and contemporary.
Fuck you. You'd fucking think professionalism would count for fucking something.

>> No.7362208

>>7362203
It's all about the clicks, baby

>> No.7362239
File: 560 KB, 739x741, 1440046055393.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362239

>>7361857

>all that kek shit

>> No.7362291

>>7360862
>Most of them are useless anyway
Rectify thyself, glabrous vermin

>> No.7362337
File: 214 KB, 1024x576, 1446416511768.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362337

>>7360738
THE END IS NIGH

>> No.7362349

>>7360858
We're all going to die alone here.

Literature was a lie.

>> No.7362352

Are you enjoying the end of western civilisation?

>> No.7362369

>>7360738
>Our post explains why we chose it.
Doubtful, unless it straight up says "We did it for the attention."

>> No.7362382

>>7360738
shouldn't it be
s m h
t b h
or
f a m ???

>> No.7362384

>>7360771
Am I the only person who doesn't see anything wrong with this?

>> No.7362389

>>7361750

Strong post, if I'm being frank with you friends

>> No.7362403

>all these prescriptivists throwing tantrums

In any event, they've been doing shit like this for years. Last year's WOTY was "vape" for Christ's sake. Before that it was "selfie," and a while back it was "GIF." If all of you declaring the end of civilization are only now finding out about this, I sincerely doubt your literacy.

I would also like to see a rigorous argument explaining why "GIF" and "unfriend" are ok, but this isn't.

Inb4
>it's only a word if it doesn't look like something :^)

>> No.7362404

>>7360769
I'm not being funny but we are genuinely living at the dawn of a new era of barbarism. History is cyclical and civilization is fleeting.

>> No.7362406

>>7360771
this is pretty cool

>> No.7362411
File: 175 KB, 500x375, 1416996989314.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362411

>>7360769

>> No.7362412

>>7362403
Well, it's not the 'end of civilization', but it is certainly a retreat towards a preceding form of picture thinking that depends on natural forms for expression (a face, hand, etc) instead of being an expression of pure thought, which completely negates the physical signifier as something existing on its own.

>> No.7362416

>>7360769
Words are pictures m8

>> No.7362418

>>7361953
you ought to look up slang that was used in the 18th century or earlier

>> No.7362420

>word of the year

>a pictograph black people post under vine videos

i would have preferred the facetious "100" / clapping spam

>> No.7362423
File: 537 KB, 480x270, 1435547209216.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7362423

>>7362403
>taking people's lighthearted joking this serious

>> No.7362426

>>7361953
today's slang is tomorrows official language, silly

>> No.7362765

>>7361857
>They
>extending a fucking closed class word

Fuck Oxford.

>> No.7362787

>>7362765
How would you refer to a single individual of unknown gender?

>> No.7362790

>>7362787
Freak

>> No.7362800

>>7362790
"After thinking for a moment, freak decided to reply with 'Freak', fundamentally misunderstanding the question."

>> No.7362803

>>7360769
Cavemen had words you dumb brick.

>> No.7362977

>>7361864
>>7362765
I thought this was an actual thing in english.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/they
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/they#Pronoun
>since the 1300s

>> No.7363331

>>7362787
It.

>> No.7363370

>>7361507
It's a played-out joke that's about as funny as baneposting.

>> No.7363428

>caring about what the OED thinks

>> No.7363439

>>7360738
burning all my oxfords right now, desu senpai.

>> No.7363507

>>7361961
In a broad sense, yes, but we do make distinctions between verbal and nonverbal language. Word is a name specific to signs that have both a sonorous (not sure if right word) and a graphed signifier, and a graphed signifier that corresponds to the sounds inside an alphabet or something equivalent to one.

So no, in the current system an emoji probably does not qualify as a word. This could be pointing towards a different writing system though. I'm curious.

>> No.7364656

>>7360771
Jesus christ I was in my Bookshop today (I had $90 worth of Book Vouchers I received because of a school award) and I was looking in the Humour section and I saw that fucking thing along with the Hamlet one. I thought it was just some online meme thing some anon made. I didn't realise they were actual books.

>> No.7364731

I don't know what emojis are.

Now I might have a peripheral grasp because I know what emoticons are but it seems like this is a new and terrible mutation of the :( and ;) and :O of the 90s.

Like there's a pile of actual shit with cartoon eyeballs on it and this is some kind of universally recognized and beloved sigil?

What the fuck is going on here?

>> No.7364748

>>7364731
>what the fuck is going on here?

The slow and painful death of respected western institutions.

>> No.7364787

>>7364748
>Oxford
>respected western institution
TOP KEK

>> No.7364833

>>7360738
OMG!!! NOT OXford dictionary!! !!! Not the lasst bastion of taste and erudition!! They did nottt choose an emoicon for their word of the year!? WTF?????????????

Fucking lol!! This is going to send some fucking shockwaves through the corridors of proper diction and etiquette!!


*batting away blackout drunk induced night terrors*
Oh thank god. Haha, oxford dictionary, is that still around, I wonder what sort of sad sack, quasi-literate, middle american paste-body still enshrines that try hard tomb. Hur dur better get the old Oxford to put next my Britannica. Jesus fucking christ, and now to dip that appeal, hah, gross, really fucking gross.

>> No.7364862

>>7362787
Degenerate

>> No.7364867

>>7364833
*srry but u gone 2 far*
*teleports behind u*
*unsheathes katana*
*cuts ur head off*
psh...nothin personel...kid

>> No.7364870

:')

>> No.7364875

CANT WAKE UP

>> No.7364876

>>7364833
I agree with this post.

I mean seeerrrioussly /lit/bros, are you really so self concious about your taste??

>> No.7364878

>>7364875
B4 ya go go :')

>> No.7364892
File: 8 KB, 261x359, 0278 - yOrHKKS.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7364892

>>7360738
Some of you guys are alright. Don't go to
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠠⠤⢄⢀⡤⠤⠄⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠈⡓⣶⣭⣤⣗⡒⠒⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡪⠾⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣷⣄
⢀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⣤⣤⣶⣿⣧⣾⣿⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⢠⣶⣿⣿⣷⡦
⠘⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠁
⢠⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷
⢀⠙⠿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣿⡿⠋
⢀⢀⢀⠼⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠁⢀⢀⣨⠭⡎⠤⠊⣿⣿⣿⣯⠉⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⣿⠯⡄⢀⢀⢀⣿⡃⠘⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡆
⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⡏⣾⣿⢸⢀⢀⢀⠻⠃⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡇
⢀⢀⢀⠸⢿⡅⠹⠏⠈⢸⠑⢀⢀⢀⢀⣴⢀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡇⢀⢀⢀⡠⠂⢁⠜
⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⡇⢀⢀⢀⢀⣀⣀⣠⣴⣿⣿⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⠇⢠⠁⢩⠠⠴⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⡄⢀⢀⢀⠈⢻⣿⣿⣿⡟⢈⣿⣿⠟⠘⢀⢸⠑⠪⡠⠒⠂
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⡿⣦⣀⢀⢀⠘⠛⢛⣉⡤⠞⠛⠁⢀⢀⢀⠈⡄⢀⠃⠂⠄
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠙⠿⠛⢛⣿⣿⣿⣧⣘⣦⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠐⠉⡂⠐⠊
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡠⠂⢀⠔⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣎⣿⣆⠉⢀⠈⠁⢀⠔⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢠⠁⡰⠁⢀⠈⣽⣿⣿⣿⣷⡿⠈⢣⠒⢀⠒⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡃⢀⢀⢠⣽⣿⣿⣿⣇⢣⠤⠊⢳
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢠⡠⠇⠠⡠⣳⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⢀⢀⢀⢀⢣
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢀⢀⢀⢀⠠⠈⠆
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣀⢀⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠤⣤⢀⠐⢀⡤
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⠂⠑⠚⠽⠿⠿⢤⠥⠤⡖⠊⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⢀⢰⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⡇⢀⡎
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢠⠃⢠⠁
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢸⢀⠸⢀⠸
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣎⢀⡔⠒⠐⣀⡀
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡄
⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇
tomorrow.

>> No.7364895

>>7364867
*god damning like a son of a bitch*
*head seeing it's body falling into a heap on the floor with it's last seconds of registration*
*can't even chop you back, fuck*

>> No.7364897

>>7362337
isnt that deadmau5'?

>> No.7364903

>>7364867
fuck

>> No.7365011

>>7362416
sure but pictures aren't words.

>> No.7365018

>>7364892
Don't go to Keksandra tomorrow?

But I had a date with her.

>> No.7365032
File: 1.03 MB, 1840x3264, IMG_20151118_022823_757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7365032

>>7360738
Well, anons, what do I do with this piece of shit?

>> No.7365095

>>7365032
Shit on it

>> No.7365116

>>7361857
>they

That is legit though

>> No.7365118

>>7363370
For you

>> No.7365158
File: 43 KB, 600x403, untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7365158

>>7361857
>lumbersexual

it's a joke, right? right?

>> No.7365277

15 years ago, the American Dialect Society voted "chad" as the word of the year.

Today, the emoji was considered Oxford's word of the year.

In 15 years time, ???????????

>> No.7366645

>>7365158
Sadly, no.

>> No.7366652

>>7360738
When are you idiots going to understand the difference between descriptive and prescriptive?

>> No.7366658

>>7365011
Of course they are.

>> No.7366670

>Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by eactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for commiting thought-crime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occcured to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?

>> No.7366684

this has probably been posted 10 times but they do this shit for promotion and EVERY YEAR it works and people get mad

>> No.7366892

>>7360761
it doesnt represent joy

>> No.7366924

>>7361857
I only see neoliberal shit.

>> No.7366941

>>7364897
yes. one of his cars. ferrari tried to send him a cease and desist for his similar 458 spyder but theyre both just wrapped so he peeled them off

>> No.7366963
File: 23 KB, 366x369, 2015-11-19_01-14-05.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7366963

Let's see what Oxford Dictionary has chosen previous years.

Oh, looks like there has always been meme words that people don't remember a year after.

But please continue fueling up the "controversy" if you want.

>> No.7366983

>>7366963
Until 2008 all those words were legit and some of them are commonly used.

>> No.7367053

literally all this is is free publicity for Oxford Dictionaries Inc., hope you're happy unintentional shills

>> No.7368201

>>7367053
Thank you for saying literally, otherwise I might have thought you meant figuratively.

>> No.7368206
File: 57 KB, 600x566, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7368206

>>7368201
:'^D