/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.7339213]

I miss the Stirner threads.

[Anonymous No.7339223]

I don't. They were worse than the christposting.

[Anonymous No.7339225]

Only edgy moral nihilists like stirner

[Anonymous No.7339246]

I've been gone for one year. Prior to that, I posted here daily. Can somebody clue me in on the latest goofs and gaffes? Where's butterfly and the Kafka/Nabokov waifu threads?

[Anonymous No.7339253]

you're looking for >>>/his/

sage and report

[Anonymous No.7339257]

>>7339246

> Kafka/Nabokov waifu threads

It makes me moist.

[Anonymous No.7339265]

>>7339253
But there are none on /his/, they don't read !

[Anonymous No.7339270]

>>7339246
Butterfly left us for a real girl. ;_;

[Anonymous No.7339318]

>>7339225
Only dumb social justice warriors don't like stirner.

[Anonymous No.7339322]

>>7339246
this place ain't what it used to be

[Anonymous No.7339326]

/his/ happened and now you are either stuck in the wasteland of /lit/ or you move to /his/ which is complete cancer where no one has read anything besides a wiki article

[Anonymous No.7339332]

>>7339326
not a regular browser

how much has /his/ changed things around here?

[Anonymous No.7339333]

i love stirner

[Anonymous No.7339337]

>>7339332
It's barely changed anything; don't listen to him.

[Anonymous No.7339338]

>>7339326
The problem was /lit/ was flooded with people who want to discuss their feels and wandering thoughts , those who discussed books are still here.

If /his/ is filled with non readers, it just proves that /phil/ threads were just shitposters.

[Anonymous No.7339340]

>>7339332
Not much, it's a bit easier to get morality/religion/humanities threads deleted

[Anonymous No.7339344]

>>7339246
>Where's butterfly
She--she left.

[Anonymous No.7339364]

>>7339338
This. Shitposting phil fags pls go

[Anonymous No.7339372]

How does knowing something is a spook stop it from haunting you?

[Anonymous No.7339478]

>>7339253

Why is Stirner /his/? He wrote a fucking book. He's an author. You should be allowed to discuss and author and his book.

[Anonymous No.7339497]

>>7339372
It doesn't

The most we can do is become aware of our inherently spook-laden "reality" and dance the tarantella until we die

Hope is pain my friend

[Anonymous No.7339503]

>>7339478
it's quite evident that none of the stirnerposters on /lit/ ever read a word the man wrote, nor do they pretend to

[Anonymous No.7339520]

>>7339318
SJWs are moral subjectivists. Nihilists are edgelords and realists are respectable people.

[Anonymous No.7339530]

>>7339478
You can. Look at the sticky. Shitposters who just want say "that's a spook!" should go on /his/ to be with like-minded, cognitive-deficient individuals.

[Anonymous No.7339551]

>>7339497
>dance the tarantella
lewd :3

[Anonymous No.7339554]

>>7339520
>SJWs are moral subjectivists.

no, SJW would believe morals are relative but not subjective

[Anonymous No.7339576]

>>7339530
It's a spook !

[Anonymous No.7339578]

>>7339225
>Only edgy moral nihilists like stirner
The opposite of edgy moralists such as stormfags.

[Anonymous No.7339598]

>>7339520
SJWs are moral subjectivists in a strict definitory sense but in action they're actually more like "moral projectivists". They're like the bastard children of Kant and Marx whereby the categorical imperative is used in such a way as to impose their subjective morality on a global scale. It's effectively egoic masturbation disguised as morality. For example, the phrase "no good person is a racist" (apart from the obvious "no true Scotsman" fallacy exemplified just as readily in your own post) is a perfect example of a subjective judgement heightened to the level of cultural law, enforced by cultural ostracism and derision instead of incarceration and force. When one "obeys"/"agrees" with the cultural law they are rewarded with that feel good liberal saviour fantasy euphoria; how can something be wrong if it makes me feel so good? That pleasure is entirely Pavlovian in nature, and as the generations plod onwards the response will only become more engrained and society as a whole will be forced to ebb and flow with a cultural morality decided by an invisible choir of intelligentsia and people of power.

It's Hitler's Germany without any of the economic boom or hope, only derision, division and euthanization of anyone/anything decided by the ruling culture as "problematic"

Also
>Nihilism
>Not a form of realism

[Anonymous No.7339634]

>>7339598
>It's Hitler's Germany
all that text ruined by the most hackneyed comparison

[Anonymous No.7339674]

>>7339634
I'll admit it's not the most elegant comparison but it's the most relevant example of a supposedly well intentioned and hopeful rejuvenation of a culture leading to less than desirable results (that being the war and the atrocities committed by everyone involved)

[Anonymous No.7339684]

>>7339246
Butterfly left late September because she moved in with some chick and wanted to shuffle up her hobbies.

We still like Kafka and Nabokov

[Anonymous No.7339690]

>>7339684
will she ever return

>tfw miss her

[Anonymous No.7339797]

>>7339265
you are in luck

>>>/his/187766

[Anonymous No.7339810]

>>7339690
I'm not sure if she's planing on becoming a regular poster again but she said something about coming back now and then to post

[Anonymous No.7339882]

>>7339225
serious spook factor going on in that post

can you spoiler that shit

[Anonymous No.7339889]

>>7339332
Barely anything, it serves as a great containment board now for /pol/ shits and /r9k/ retards.

[Anonymous No.7339906]

>>7339332
there are noticibly less philosophy threads

[Anonymous No.7339915]

>>7339906
it's just back to normal. there were more for a while until the sticky change

[Anonymous No.7340005]

Stirner is refreshing. Of course to call him refreshing would be to imply that there is some stagnant standard in philosophy, which would be acknowledging a spook.