/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.7159583]

Literally imagine being aged 18 - 29 right now on this Friday night and not going on a night out and being one of the 20 % of men who get 80 % of the casual sex*. Imagine how bad it must be if you're /fit/ and you still can't be one of the 20 % males. Females have freedom at university and are in their physical prime. Tinder and Facebook give them easy access to desirable males and a concrete idea of her desirability and position of relationship power. And they choose not to give anything to almost all males, including you.

They're currently on nights out, lapping up the attention from males, and easily rejecting 95 % of them within a few sentences of conversation. You as a male, are damned if you do, and damned if you don't. You will be judged for your unsuccessful approaches, your value decreasing in the eyes of your entire social circle after each failure. Yet a lack of participation will lead to a qualitatively different perception from your male and female friends. They will perceive an emasculated male, clearly waiting for his grand maturity as a 30 something "desirable partner". In the back of their minds they hope that you are gay, but consciously they can see from your behaviour, both at night in the "wilderness" of clubs, and during the calm moments of the day, during group lunches, where your lack of extra attention or supplication towards the brain-dead comments of female group members in comparison with the male ones, or the extra attention (one of the choices will inevitably be perceived, it can't be avoided), will be definitive proof of your status as a Herbivore Male: Waiting For Marriage And A Nice Girl (treat with polite detachment).

*remember this distribution gets more extreme if you look at it in different ways. 5 % of men get 50 % of casual sex or something like that. Obviously the exact numbers are made up but this type of distribution is common in many areas.

[saghe No.7159589]

how is this related to literature again?

[Anonymous No.7159595]

>>7159589
Don't you know you only need to include the word 'book' in a post and it's automatically literature?

lmao anon
simply lmao

[Anonymous No.7159598]

Red pill fags love to throw these numbers around, but I have never seen a study that actually supports their claims.

[Anonymous No.7159605]

To pathetic; Didn't read

If you can't get laid do math or something and quit crying like a bitch or bang a hooker

>>>/r9k/

[Anonymous No.7159616]

>>7159598
This.

ffs at my college, most people could get laid even if they weren't particularly attractive. Posts like this are just paranoid ramblings.