[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 72 KB, 1041x397, 1365516022491.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6968530 No.6968530 [Reply] [Original]

Accepting the premises of antinatalism, is this its final form?

Are there any philosophical works like this?

>> No.6968536

>>6968530
Crime & Punishment.

>> No.6968898

antinatalism is nonviolent

>> No.6969070

>>6968530
Very interesting op. I'd like to explore this further. Thanks for the picture. Obviously you can start with existentialists, move to the nihilists, move to the antinatalists (ligotti, are there any others in literature? Art?) and then we have this... Hmm.

What are your thoughts? It seems a bit over critical of antinatalism, as opposed to a praise of this further idea. Could be written in a more affirmative way.

>> No.6969076

>>6969070
How do you mean over critical?

>> No.6969103

>subscribing to a philosophy that has a name

>> No.6969114

>>6969076
Not the concept itself, just the post. It's written through the lens of "this is why it's a better view (or a correction) of antinatalism" as opposed to a presentation of the idea independently. If I were to write an introduction to this concept, I'd probably first discuss the philosophical tradition leading to it, then describe it as it stands on its own, and then perhaps discuss similarities and differences between it and antinatalism.

Maybe a different order, but you get the point.

>> No.6969139

>>6969103
>being a namefag

>> No.6969151

>>6969139
>not owning your opinions but instead losing them in a sea of anonymous clones each claiming to be right

>> No.6969160

>>6969151
Why don't you go to reddit then if that's what you're looking for, you scum?

>> No.6969167

>>6968530
why do you make this same shitty thread over and over

>> No.6969247

>>6969167
I've been lurking 24/7 for the past week or so and I've never seen this thread.

>> No.6969489
File: 403 KB, 680x680, quentin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6969489

>> No.6969507

>>6969247
same tbh

>> No.6969569
File: 154 KB, 586x282, fedora individual.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6969569

>>6969103
>>6969151

>> No.6969572
File: 188 KB, 720x504, Untitled66.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6969572

>>6968530
>literature

>> No.6969573

>>6969247
newfag pls

antinatalist threads happen all the time

>> No.6970221

>>6969573
Yeah but this isn't an antinatalist thread. That's all I meant.